Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:03:11.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vortex–wave interaction arrays: a sustaining mechanism for the log layer?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2018

Philip Hall Open the ORCID record for Philip Hall [Opens in a new window]
Philip Hall*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: phil.hall@monash.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vortex–wave interaction theory is used to describe new kinds of localised and distributed exact coherent structures. Starting with a localised vortex–wave interaction state driven by a single inviscid wave, regular arrays of interacting vortex–wave states are investigated. In the first instance the arrays described are operational in an infinite uniform shear flow; we refer to them as ‘uniform shear vortex–wave arrays’. The basic form of the interaction remains identical to the canonical one found by Hall & Smith (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 227, 1991, pp. 641–666) and subsequently used to describe exact coherent structures by Hall & Sherwin (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 661, 2010, pp. 178–205). Thus in each cell of a vortex–wave array a roll stress jump is induced across the critical layer of an inviscid wave riding on the streak part of the flow. The theory is extended to arbitrary shear flows using a nonlinear Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin–Jeffreys or ray theory approach with the wave–roll–streak field operating on a shorter length scale than the mean flow. The evolution equation governing the slow dynamics of the interaction turns out to be a modified form of the well-known mean equation for a turbulent flow, and its particular form can be interpreted as a ‘closure’ between the small and large scales of the flow. If the array structure is taken to be universal, in the sense that it applies to arbitrary shear flows, then the array takes on a form which supports a logarithmic mean velocity profile trapped between what can be identified with the ‘wake region’ and a ‘buffer layer’ well known in the context of wall-bounded turbulent flows. The many similarities between the distributed structures described and wall-bounded turbulence suggest that vortex–wave arrays might be involved in the self-sustaining process supporting the log layer. The modification of the mean profile within each cell of the array leads to ‘staircase’-like streamwise velocity profiles similar to those observed experimentally in turbulent flows. The wave field supporting the ‘staircase’ is concentrated in critical layers which can be associated with the shear layer structures that have been attributed by experimentalists to be the mechanism supporting the uniform-momentum zones of the staircase.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary Layers Boundary Layers: Boundary layer structure
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 850 , 10 September 2018 , pp. 46 - 82
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benney, D. J. & Bergeron, R. F. 1966 A new class of nonlinear waves in parallel flows. Stud. Appl. Maths 48, 181–204.Google Scholar
Blackburn, H. M., Hall, P. & Sherwin, S. J. 2013 Lower branch equilibria in Couette flow: the emergence of canonical states for arbitrary shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 58–85.Google Scholar
Brand, E. & Gibson, J. F. 2014 Spanwise-localized solutions of planar shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 745, 25–61.Google Scholar
Chernyshenko, S. I. & Big, M. F. 2005 The mechanism of streak formation in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 58–85.Google Scholar
Chini, G. P., Montemuro, B., White, C. M. & Klewicki, J. 2017 A self-sustaining process model of inertial layer dynamics in high Reynolds number turbulent wall flows. Phil. Trans. A 375, 20160092.Google Scholar
Deguchi, K. & Hall, P. 2014 The high-Reynolds-number asymptotic development of nonlinear equilibrium states in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 99–112.Google Scholar
Deguchi, K. & Hall, P. 2015 Free-stream coherent structures in growing boundary-layers: a link to near wall streaks. J. Fluid Mech. 778, 451–484.Google Scholar
Deguchi, K., Hall, P. & Walton, A. G. 2013 The emergence of localized vortex–wave states in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 58–85.Google Scholar
Dempsey, L. J., Deguchi, K., Hall, P. & Walton, A. G. 2016 Localized vortex/Tollmien–Schlichting wave interaction states in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 791, 97–121.Google Scholar
Duguet, Y., Schlatter, P., Hennigson, D. & Eckhardt, B. 2012 Self-sustained localized structures in boundary-layer flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 044501.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. F., Halcrow, J. & Cvitanovic, P. 2008 Visualizing the geometry of state space in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 107–130.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 1988 The nonlinear development of Görtler vortices in growing boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 193, 243–266.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 1995 A phase equation approach to boundary layer transition: Tollmien–Schlichting waves. J. Fluid Mech. 304, 185–212.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Horseman, N. J. 1991 The linear inviscid secondary instability of longitudinal vortex structures in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 232, 357–375.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Lakin, W. D. 1988 The fully nonlinear development of Görtler vortices in growing boundary layers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 415, 421–444.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Sherwin, S. 2010 Streamwise vortices in shear flows: harbingers of transition and the skeleton of coherent structures. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 178–205.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Smith, F. T. 1988 The nonlinear interaction of Görtler vortices and Tollmien–Schlichting waves in curved channel flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 417, 255–282.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Smith, F. T. 1991 On strongly nonlinear vortex/wave interactions in boundary-layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 641–666.Google Scholar
Itano, T. & Toh, S. 2001 The dynamics of bursting process in wall turbulence. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 70, 703–716.Google Scholar
Kawahara, G. & Kida, S. 2001 Periodic motion embedded in plane Couette turbulence: regeneration cycle and burst. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 291–300.Google Scholar
Kreilos, T. & Eckhardt, B. 2012 Periodic orbits near onset of chaos in plane Couette flow. Chaos 22, 047505.Google Scholar
Maestri, J. L.2015 Vortex–wave interactions and exact coherent structures in shear flows. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Nagata, M. 1990 Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: bifurcation from infinity. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 519–527.Google Scholar
Silva, M. S., Philip, J., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2017 Interfaces of uniform momentum zones in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 820, 451–478.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1966 Double boundary layers in oscillatory viscous flows. J. Fluid Mech. 24, 673–687.Google Scholar
Thiele, U., Archer, A. J., Robbins, M. J., Gomez, H. & Knobloch, E. 2013 Localizes states in the conserved Swift–Hohenberg equation with cubic nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. E 83, 042915.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1997 On a self-sustaining process in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 9, 883–900.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 2001 Exact coherent structures in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 435, 93–102.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Gibson, J. & Waleffe, F. 2007 Lower branch states in shear flows: transition and control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 204501.Google Scholar
Wedin, H. & Kerswell, R. 2004 Exact coherent structures in pipe flow: travelling wave solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 333–371.Google Scholar
Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2009 Turbulent dynamics of pipe flow captured in a reduced model: puff relaminarization and localised ‘edge’ states. J. Fluid Mech. 619, 213–233.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Moin, P., Wallace, J. M., Sparta, J., Lozano-Duran, A. & Hickey, J. P. 2017 Transitional–turbulent spots and turbulent–turbulent spots in boundary layers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114 (87), E5292–E5299.Google Scholar