Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:05:27.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extension of classical stability theory to viscous planar wall-bounded shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2019

Harry Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Shixiao Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*
Email address for correspondence: wang@math.auckland.ac.nz

Abstract

A viscous extension of Arnold’s inviscid theory for planar parallel non-inflectional shear flows is developed and a viscous Arnold’s identity is obtained. Special forms of the viscous Arnold’s identity have been revealed that are closely related to the perturbation’s enstrophy identity derived by Synge (Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress for Applied Mechanics, 1938, pp. 326–332, John Wiley) (see also Fraternale et al., Phys. Rev. E, vol. 97, 2018, 063102). Firstly, an alternative derivation of the perturbation’s enstrophy identity for strictly parallel shear flows is acquired based on the viscous Arnold’s identity. The alternative derivation induces a weight function. Thereby, a novel weighted perturbation’s enstrophy identity is established, which extends the previously known enstrophy identity to include general streamwise translation-invariant shear flows. Finally, the validity of the enstrophy identity for parallel shear flows is rigorously examined and established under global nonlinear dynamics imposed with two classes of wall boundary conditions. As an application of the enstrophy identity, we quantitatively investigate the mechanism of linear instability/stability within the normal modal framework. The investigation reveals a subtle interaction between a critical layer and its adjacent boundary layer, which determines the stability nature of the disturbance. As an implementation of the relaxed wall boundary conditions imposed for the enstrophy identity, a control scheme is proposed that transitions the wall settings from the no-slip condition to the free-slip condition, through which a flow is stabilized quickly in an early stage of the transition.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. A. & Fournier, J. J. F. 2003 Sobolev Spaces, 2nd ed. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, V. I. 1965 Conditions for the nonlinear stability of the stationary plane curvilinear flows of an ideal fluid. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 162, 975978.Google Scholar
Arnold, V. I. 1969 On a priori estimate in the theory of hydrodynamic stability. Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 19, 267269.Google Scholar
Arnold, V. I. & Khesin, B. A. 1998 Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 125. Springer.10.1007/b97593Google Scholar
Boyd, J. P. 2000 Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd ed. Dover.Google Scholar
Doering, C. R., Spiegel, E. A. & Worthing, R. A. 2000 Energy dissipation in a shear layer with suction. Phys. Fluids 12, 19551968.10.1063/1.870443Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 2004 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616938Google Scholar
Fjørtoft, R. 1950 Application of integral theorems in deriving criteria of stability for laminar flows and for the baroclinic circular vortex. Geophys. Publ. 17, 152.Google Scholar
Fraternale, F., Domenicale, L., Staffilani, G. & Tordella, D. 2018 Internal waves in sheared flows: lower bound of the vorticity growth and propagation discontinuities in the parameter space. Phys. Rev. E 97, 063102.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2016 High-Reynolds number Taylor–Couette turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 5380.10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034353Google Scholar
Kachanov, Y. S. 1994 Physical mechanisms of laminar-boundary-layer transition. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 411482.10.1146/annurev.fl.26.010194.002211Google Scholar
Küchemann, D. 1965 Report on the I.U.T.A.M. symposium on concentrated vortex motions in fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 120.10.1017/S0022112065000010Google Scholar
Mack, L. M. 1976 A numerical study of the temporal eigenvalue spectrum of the Blasius boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 497520.10.1017/S002211207600147XGoogle Scholar
Orr, W. M’F. 1907 The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part II. A viscous liquid. Proc. R. Irish Acad. A 27, 69204.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equation. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 689703.10.1017/S0022112071002842Google Scholar
Plasting, S. C. & Kerswell, R. R. 2003 Improved upper bound on the energy dissipation rate in plane Couette flow: the full solution to Busse’s problem and the Constantin–Doering–Hopf problem with one-dimensional background field. J. Fluid Mech. 477, 363379.10.1017/S0022112002003361Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1880 On the stability, or instability, of certain fluid motions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 11, 5770.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows, Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 142. Springer.10.1007/978-1-4613-0185-1Google Scholar
Serrin, J. 1959 On the stability of viscous fluid motions. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 3, 113.10.1007/BF00284160Google Scholar
Synge, J. L. 1938 The stability of plane Poiseuille motion. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress for Applied Mechanics, pp. 326332. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Tsinober, A. 2001 An Informal Introduction to Turbulence, Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 63. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. & Kerswell, K. 2011 Shear Turbulence: Onset and Structure (Lecture Notes). pp. 7991. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.Google Scholar
Yau, P. W., Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 2016 Extension to nonlinear stability theory of the circular Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 455493.10.1017/jfm.2016.219Google Scholar