Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:06:42.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civil aviation and the environmental challenge

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. E. Green
J. E. Green*
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association Bedford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the coming century, the impact of air travel on the environment will become an increasingly powerful influence on aircraft design. Unless the impact per passenger kilometre can be reduced substantially relative to today’s levels, environmental factors will increasingly limit the expansion of air travel and the social benefit that it brings. This essay considers the three main impacts, noise, air pollution around airports and influence on climate change. Of the three, impact on climate change is taken to have the greatest long-term importance and is discussed at the greatest length. It is argued that, of the three main contributors to climate change from aircraft – CO2 emissions, NOX emissions and the creation of persistent contrails – it is the last two which are the most promising targets. Ways of reducing the impacts of these two are discussed and it is noted that, in each case, the best environmental result is likely to entail some increase in CO2 emissions. It follows that regulatory or economic measures to reduce impact on climate should be framed so as to do just that. Measures framed purely in terms of CO2 emissions are likely to be counter-productive. Nevertheless, the design of aircraft to reduce fuel burn and hence CO2 emission remains a key long-term objective; the essay considers the potential offered by new technology and new design concepts in this arena.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1072: Aerospace the challenge ahead , June 2003 , pp. 281 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Allen, J.E., Global energy issues affecting aeronautics: a reasoned conjecture, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1999, 35, (5), pp 413–453.Google Scholar
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, 1999, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
3. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe, Strategic Research Agenda, October 2002.Google Scholar
4. Green, J.E., Greener by Design – the technology challenge, Aeronaut J, February 2002, 106, (1056), pp 57–113.Google Scholar
5. Air Travel – Greener by design, Air Travel – Greener by Design: Improving Operations; The Technology Challenge; Market-Based Options, February 2002.Google Scholar
6. Baden-Powell, B.F.S., Presidential address, Aeronaut J, January 1903, 7, (25), pp 3–8.Google Scholar
7. Kuchemann, D. The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft, Pergamon, 1978.Google Scholar
8. Murman, E.M., Walton, M. and Rebentisch, E., Challenges in the better, faster, cheaper era of aeronautical design, engineering and manufacturing, Aeronaut J, October 2000, 104, (1040), pp 481–489.Google Scholar
9. Birch, N.T., 2020 vision: the prospects for large civil aircraft propulsion, Aeronaut J, August 2000, 104, (1038), pp 347–352.Google Scholar
10. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, The environmental effects of civil aircraft in flight, November 2002.Google Scholar
11. UK Sustainable Development Commission, Air transport and sustainable development – a submission from the SDC, November 2002.Google Scholar
12. Jamieson, D. MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, Leisure Flights, written answer, 3 February 2003, Hansard Column 43W.Google Scholar
13. ICAO, Operational opportunities to minimise fuel use and reduce emissions, proposed ICAO Circular, CAEP/5-IP/4, January 2001.Google Scholar
14. Department for Transport, Aviation and the environment: using economic instruments, March 2003.Google Scholar
15. DETR, Night restrictions at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted, revised restrictions with effect from 31 October 1999, 10 June 1999.Google Scholar
16. Powell, C.A. and Preisser, J.S., NASA Subsonic jet transport noise reduction research, Aeronaut J, August 2000, 104, (1038), pp 353–358.Google Scholar
17. Aeronet Working Paper Nr.2, Influence of engine cycle on emissions, results of a workshop held at Munich on 14 September 1999.Google Scholar
18. Rogers, H.L., Lee, D.S., Raper, D.W., Foster, P.M. DeF., Wilson, C.W. and Newton, P.J., The impacts of aviation on the atmosphere, Aeronaut J, October 2002, 106, (1064), pp 521–546.Google Scholar
19. Travis, D.J., Carleton, A.M. and Lauritsen, G., Climatology: contrails reduce daily temperature range, Nature, 8 August 2002, 418, (601).Google Scholar
20. Lee, D.S., Clare, P.E., Haywood, J., Kärcher, B., Lunnon, R.W., Pilling, I., Slingo, A. and Tilston, J.R., Identifying the uncertainties in radiative forcing of climate from aviation contrails and aviation-induced cirrus, DERA/AS/PTD/CR000103, September 2000.Google Scholar
21. Gierens, K., Schumann, U., Smit, H.G.J., Helten, M. and Zangl, G., Determination of humidity and temperature fluctuations based on MOZAIC data and parameterisation of persistent contrail coverage for general circulation models, Annales Geophysicae, 1997, 15, pp 1057–1066.Google Scholar
22. ICCAIA, Emissions technology review, Working Paper 3/11 presented at the 3rd meeting of ICAO/CAEP Working Group 3, Savannah, GA, USA, May 1997.Google Scholar
23. Whellens, M.W. and Singh, R., Propulsion system optimisation for minimum Global Warming Potential, Proceedings of ICAS 2002 Congress, Toronto, September 2002, Paper 7111.Google Scholar
24. Klug, H.G., Bakan, S. and Gayler, V., Cryoplane – Quantitative comparison of contribution to anthropogenic greenhouse effect of liquid hydrogen aircraft versus conventional kerosene aircraft, European Geophysical Society, XXI General Assembly, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 1996.Google Scholar
25. Peel, C.J., Advances in materials for aerospace, Aeronaut J, December 1996, 100, (1000), pp 487–503.Google Scholar
26. Plohr, M., Döpelheuer, A. and Lecht, M., The gas turbine heat cycle and its influence on fuel efficiency and emissions, presented at NATO/RTO Air Vehicle Technology Symposium, Ottawa, October 1999.Google Scholar
27. Wong, P.W.C. and Maina, M., Studies of methods and philosophies for designing hybrid laminar flow wings, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, Harrogate, September 2000, paper 2.8.2.Google Scholar
28. Sawyers, D.M. and Wilson, R.A.L., Assessment of the impact of hybrid laminar flow on a large subsonic aircraft, presented at 2nd European Laminar Flow Forum, Bordeaux, 10–12 June 1996.Google Scholar
29. Wilson, R.A.L. and Jones, R.I., Project design studies on aircraft employing natural and assisted laminar flow technologies, SAE Technical Paper 952038, September 1995.Google Scholar
30. Smith, H., College of aeronautics blended wing body development programme, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, Harrogate, September 2000, paper 1.1.4.Google Scholar
31. Denisov, V.E., Bolsunovsky, A.L., Buzoverya, N.P. and Gurevich, B.I., Recent investigations of the very large passenger blended wing-body aircraft, Proceedings of ICAS 98 Congress, Melbourne, September 1998, paper 4.10.2.Google Scholar
32. Denning, R.M., Allen, J.E. and Armstrong, F.W., Future large aircraft design – the delta with suction, Aeronaut J, May 1997, 101, (1005), pp 187–198.Google Scholar
33. Lachmann, G V (Ed), Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Pergamon Press, 1961.Google Scholar