Abstract
The Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), first established by the UK University Grants Committee in 1985 has been an important instrument in the modernisation of higher education in the UK. It is a means of rationalising the stratification of universities and the concentration of research resources, and of maximising research output. At the same time, while its operation remains substantially under professional control, it has had profound implications for the academic profession. The article explores these through analysing the workings of the RAE and its consequences for higher education institutions, departments and individuals. It suggests that the RAE has triggered substantial changes in the management of the research function in universities and in the culture of university departments. It has disturbed the web of relationship between the individual academic, the discipline, the department and the institution. It has impacted on individual professional identities and concepts of research responsibilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Advisory Board for the Research Councils (ABRC) (1987). A Strategy for the Research Base. London: HMSO.
Bauer, M., Marton, S., Askling, B. and Marton, F. (1999). Transforming Universities. Patterns of Governance, Structure and Learning in Swedish Higher Education at the Millennial Turn. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Boyer, E., Altbach, P.G. and Whitelaw, M.J. (1994). The Academic Profession: An International Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Learning.
Clark, B.R. (1991). 'The fragmentation of research, teaching and study', in Trow, M. and Nybom, T. (eds.). University and Society: Essays on the Social Role of Research and Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Fulton, O. (1997). 'Research assessment: Present and future imperfect?', Research assessment: Future Perfect? UWE and SRHE Conference Report. Bristol: University of theWest of England.
Halsey, A.H. (1992). The Decline of Donnish Dominion: The British Academic Professions in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press.
HEFCE (1995). Research Assessment Exercise: Criteria for Assessment, RAE 96 3/95. Bristol: HEFCE.
Henkel, M. (forthcoming). Academic Identities and Policy Change. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Henkel, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., Vaux, J. and von Walden Laing, D. (forthcoming). Academic Responses to the UK Foresight Programme. London: Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University.
Howells, J., Nedeva, M. and Georghiou, L. (1998). Industry-Academic Links in the UK. Bristol: HEFCE and Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology (PREST).
Ince, M. (1986). The Politics of British Science. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
Kogan, M. and Hanney, S. (1999). Reforming Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
McNay, I. (1997). The Impact of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise on Individual and Institutional Behaviour in English Higher Education. Summary Report and Commentary. Chelmsford: Centre for Higher Education Management, Anglia Polytechnic University.
McNay, I. (1999). 'The paradoxes of research assessment and funding', in Henkel, M. and Little, B. (1999). Changing Relationships between Higher Education and the State. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
University Grants Committee (1985). Planning for the Late 1980s, Circular 12/85. London: UGC.
Williams, B. (1991). University Responses to Research Selectivity. London: Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education, University of London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henkel, M. The modernisation of research evaluation: The case of the UK. Higher Education 38, 105–122 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003799013939
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003799013939