Skip to main content
Log in

Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of working memory demonstrate that some forms of information are retrieved by a content-addressable mechanism (McElree & Dosher, 1989; McElree, 1996, 1998), whereas others require a slower search-based mechanism (McElree & Dosher, 1993). Measures of the speed and accuracy of processing sentences with filler-gap dependencies demonstrate that the probability of maintaining a representation of a filler item decreases as additional material is processed, but that the speed with which a preserved representation is accessed is unaffected by the amount of interpolated material. These results suggest that basic binding operations in sentence comprehension are mediated by a content-addressable memory system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Clark, S. E. & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosher, B. A. and McElree, B. (1992) Memory search: Retrieval processes in short-term and long-term recognition. In Larry Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of learning and memory (pp. 398–406). New York, Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. K., & Sag, I. A. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillund, G. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, S. D., Edwards, M. B., and Ohrt, D. D. (1997). Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 23, 1261–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model-comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (1996). Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. (1993). The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension: A timecourse analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 536–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. (1996). Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. (1998). Attended and non-attended states in working memory: Accessing categorized structures. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: Time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1993). Serial retrieval processes in the recovery of order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 134–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1998). Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence processing: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 432–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B., & Nordlie, J. (in press). Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 486–494.

  • McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (in preparation) Content-addressable memories subserve language processing.

  • Murdock, B. B. Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory-scanning: New findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D., Ford, M., Bresnan, J., & Frauenfelder, U., (1988). Coreference assignment during sentence processing. In M. Macken (Ed.), Language structure and processing. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A., Corbett, A. T. & Dosher, B. A. (1980). Priming and retrieval from shortterm memory: A speed-accuracy tradeoff analysis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McElree, B. Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures. J Psycholinguist Res 29, 111–123 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005184709695

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005184709695

Keywords

Navigation