Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of shelter on temperate crops: a review to define research for Australian conditions

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fact that the shelter created by windbreaks can have a significant, positive effect on crop production is supported by eight decades of research from many countries around the world. Although the concept of planting windbreaks to enhance crop production has general currency in Australia, the practice is not as wide as it could be. This review of the last decade of windbreak literature defines the research needed to encourage wider utilisation of windbreak technology. After outlining the principal mechanisms behind the effect of shelter on temperate crops, the review discusses relevant literature of the past decade especially that from Australia. The main mechanisms discussed are: the protection of crops from physical damage; soil conservation; the direct augmentation of soil moisture; and the alteration of the crop energy balance and plant water relations. Also discussed are the elusiveness of the shelter effect, competition from windbreak trees, and the modelling of windbreak systems. Suggestions for future research in Australia include: quantifying the competition of various windbreak species and the effect of root pruning on both crop and tree; a model of crop energy and water relations at the tree-crop interface; an economic model and a farmer-oriented decision support tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin CS (1988) The influence of field windbreaks on vegetable and specialty crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22–23: 191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf J, Leihner DE, Buerkert A and Serafini PG (1992) Soil tillage and windbreak effects on millet and cowpea: I. Wind speed, evaporation, and wind erosion. Agronomy Journal 84(6): 1056–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker GL, Hatfield JL and Wanjura DF (1985) Cotton phenology parameters affected by wind. Field Crops Research 12(1): 33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu PK, Kapoor KS, Nath S and Banerjee SK (1987) Allelopathic influence: an assessment on the response of agricultural crops growing near Eucalyptus tereticornis. Indian Journal of Forestry 10(4): 267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates CG (1911) Windbreaks: their influence and value. US Forest Service Bull. 86 100 pp. cited in Kort J (1988)

  • Beale P (1997) Windbreaks for production and sustainability. In: Proceedings from Farming Systems Developments 1997. Workshop held at Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, South Australia, March 18–20

  • Ben Salah H, Beji MA and Salah H Ben (1989) Effects of windbreak protection on faba bean production. Annales de l'Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie. Numero Special, 125–137 8 ref. (in French)

  • Benzarti J (1989) Influence of windbreaks on forage production. Annales de l'Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie Numero Special, 138–145 (in French)

  • Bethenod O, Katerji N, Cellier P and Quetin P (1991) Determination of carbon balance of a potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop by a simplified aerodynamic method. Photosynthetica 25(2): 231–239 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell D (1991) In Proceedings from A National Australian Conference on The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture held at Albury, Victoria, Australia, in October 1991. Also in Bird PR et al. (1992)

  • Bird PR (1988) Sheltering the farm: an economic assessment of trees. Rural Quarterly 3(4): 12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA et al. (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock Agroforestry Systems 20: 59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulir P (1992) Effects of shelterbelts on winter wheat yields, pp 163–175. Zadradnictvi (in Czech)

  • Bradley RG and Crout NMJ (1992) PARCH: a user guide. Sutton. Bonnington, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW (eds) (1988) Windbreak Technology. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 598 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR Johnson BB and Akeson T (1992) Field windbreaks: are they economical? Journal of Production Agriculture 5(3): 393–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner AJ, Jarvis PG and Vanderbelt RJ (1995a) Windbreak-crop interactions in the Sahel: 1 Dependence of shelter on field conditions. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology 75(4): 215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner AJ, Jarvis PG and Vanderbelt RJ (1995b) Tree-crop interactions in a Sahelian windbreak system. 2 Growth response of millet in shelter. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology 75(4): 235–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner AJ (1996) Microclimatic modifications in agroforestry. In: Ong CK and Huxley P (eds) Tree-Crop Interactions: A Physiological Approach. CAB International/ICRAF

  • Bulman P (1991) TREE$PLAN: a model to compare farm tree designs to South Australia. Agricultural Systems and Information Technology Newsletter, pp 16–18. Special issue: Agroforestry and Forestry Vol. 3, No.3, December 1991. Bureau of Rural Resources

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke S (1991) The effect of shelterbelts on crop yields at Rutherglen, Victoria. In: Proceedings from A National Australian Conference on The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture held at Albury, Victoria, Australia, in October 1991. Also in Bird PR et al. (1992)

  • Caborn JM (1954) Shelterbelts and microclimates Bull. 29. For Comm, London, 137 pp

  • Campbell CA (1993) Can Australian farming systems be more sylvan? Agroforestry Systems 22: 17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaput LJ and Tuskan GA (1990) Field windbreak management and its effect on adjacent crop yield. North Dakota Farm Research 48(2): 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JE and Norman JM (1988) Effects of shelter on plant water use. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23: 393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazli S (1990) Financial analysis of selected shelterbelt systems in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Forestry 40(3): 247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Feddes RA (1988) Agrometeorological aspects of emergence, water use, growth and dry matter yield of potatoes. Acta Horticulturae 214: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • French RJ and Schultz (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agric. Research 35: 743–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghulam A, Munir A, Shahid R and Babar K (1990) Effect of trees on the yield of wheat crop. Agroforestry Systems 11(1): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladun G, Opalev A and Gusak AY (1988) The protective effect of shelterbelts on the survival of winter crops during the 1985/86 winter in the Kharkov region. Lesovodstvo i Agrolesomelioratsiya No. 76, 36–39 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace J (1977) Plant Response to Wind. Academic Press, London, 204 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace J (1988a) Plant response to wind. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 22/23: 71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace J (1988b) Temperature as a determinant of plant productivity. In: Long SP and Woodward FI (eds) Plants and Temperature, pp 91–108 Society of Experimental Botany, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawke M and Gillingham A (1996) Nutrient transfer by livestock adjacent to managed and unmanaged shelterbelts. New Zealand Tree Grower 17(1): 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas CA (1995) Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 9(4): 845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough and Cooper (1988) The effects of shelter for cereal crops in an exposed area of Cleveland, North-East England. Soil Use and Management 4(1): 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley PA, Pinney A, Akunda E and Muraya P (1994) A tree/crop interface orientation experiment with a Grevillea robusta hedgerow and maize. Agroforestry Systems 26(1): 23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilyasov YI (1988) Agricultural productivity of the forest-agrarian landscape. Sibirskii Vestnik Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki No. 5, 112–114 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyasov YI and Nerubashchenko AV (1990) The water regime of soil in a dry steppe landscape improved by shelterbelt planting. Sibirskii Vestnik Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki No. 4, 79–82 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivonin VM and Zasoba VV (1990) Influence of plantations on the yields of agricultural crops. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Lesnoi Zhurnal No. 1: 129–132 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JE (1989) Tree and crop selection and management to optimize overall system productivity especially light utilisation in agroforestry. In: Reifsnyder WS and Darnhofer TO (eds) Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 163–173. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson P (1994) Influence of shelter on soil sorting by wind erosion: a case study. Catena 22(1): 35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher FM (1984) Climate and crop distribution. In: Pratley JE (ed) Principles of Field Crop Production. Sydney, Sydney University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli RK, Daljit S and Verma RC (1990) Influence of eucalypt shelterbelt on winter season agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 33(1): 23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong LX, Zhang JL, Ni JD et al. (1989) Dynamic effect of Paulownia on wheat growth and development and soil water and salt contents. Journal of Ecology (China) 8(1): 1–4 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agriculture-Ecosystems and Environment 22/23: 165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korwar GR and Radder GD (1994) Influence of root pruning and cutting interval of leucaena hedgerows on performance of alley cropped rabi sorghum Agroforestry Systems 25(2): 95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozmenko (1989) Evaluating the effectiveness of shelterbelts in the framework of integrated territorial nature-conservation schemes, pp 56–58. Lesnoe Knozyaistvo (in Russian)

  • Lamers JPA, Michels K and Vanderbeldt RJ (1994) Trees and windbreaks in the Sahel: establishment, growth, nutritive and calorific values. Agroforestry Systems 26(3): 171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SP, Lee GS, Choi DW et al. (1987) Studies on methods of reducing cold wind damage of rice plants by installation of windbreak nets in the eastern coastal area. Korean Journal of Crop Science 32(2): 163–172 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefroy T and Scott P (1994) Alley farming: new vision for Western Australian farmland. Western Australia Journal of Agriculture 35: 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Leihner DE, Buerkert A, Banzhaf J and Serafini PG (1993) Soil tillage and windbreak effects on millet and cowpea: II. Dry matter and grain yield. Agronomy Journal 85(2): 400–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys J, Packer S and Butler P (1997) Wind erosion research at Keith in the Upper South East of South Australia. Technical Report of The New South Wales Department of Land and Water Conservation

  • Li DW (1985) Tentative evaluation of the results in yield increase from shelterbelts with an agricultural effects index. Forest Science and Technology, Linye Keji-Tongxun No. 2: 14–15 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loane B (1991) FARMTREE: a model for determining the economics of agroforestry in Victoria, Australia. In: Agricultural Systems and Information Technology Newsletter, pp 15–16. Special issue: Agroforestry and Forestry, Vol. 3, No.3, December 1991, Bureau of Rural Resources

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik RS and Sharma SK (1990) Moisture extraction and crop yield as a function of distance from a row of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Agroforestry Systems 12(2): 187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JK (1967) The effect of shelter on the productivity of grasslands and field crops. Field Crop Abstracts 20(1): 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann IR, Stark JC and King BA (1992) Evaluation and interpretation of the crop water stress index for well-watered potatoes. American Potato Journal 69(12): 831–841

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkey BG, Zentner RP and Nicholaichuk W (1990) Perennial grass windbreaks for continuous wheat production on the Canadian prairies. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45(4): 482–485

    Google Scholar 

  • McMartin W, Frank AB and Heintz RH (1974) Economics of shelterbelt influence on wheat yields in North Dakota. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 29(2): 87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton KG (1988) Effect of windbreaks on turbulent transport and micro climate. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23: 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertia RS, Muthana KD and Mahander-Singh (1988) Impact of shelterbelts on pearl millet crop. Annals of Arid Zone 27(3/4): 305–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Messing I and Noureddine A (1991) Effect of windbreaks on wind velocity, evapo-transpiration and yield of irrigated crops in the arid zone. Sidi Bouzid, central Tunisia. Rural Development Studies, No. 30, 40 pp (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miloserdov NM (1985) The effect of shelterbelts on the yield of spring barley. Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, No. 8, 39–42 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miloserdov NM (1986) Effectiveness of shelterbelts for agricultural soil protection. Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, No. 7, 31–37 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miloserdov NM (1989) Shelterbelts and the yield of winter barley. Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, No. 7, 39–41 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozheiko GA and Semyakin VA (1984) Effect of protective shelterbelts and type of soil cultivation on the yield of agricultural crops in southern Ukraine. Lesovodstvo i Agrolesomelioratsiya, No. 69, 23–28 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muetzelfeldt RI and Sinclair FL (1993) Ecological modelling of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Abstracts 6(4): 207–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolajenko W (1985) Influence of shelter belts on agricultural yields. Internationale Zeitschrift der Landwirtschaft, pp 512–514 ( in German)

  • Ong CK, Corlett JE, Singh RP and Black CR (1991) Above and below ground interactions in agroforestry systems. In: PG Jarvis (ed) Agroforestry: Principles and Practice, pp 45–58. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong CK, Black CR, Marshall FM and Corlett JE (1996) Principles of resource capture and utilisation of light and water. In: Ong CK and Huxley P (eds) Tree-Crop Interactions, A Physiological Approach, pp 73–158. CAB International/ICRAF

  • Onyewoto L and Stigter C (1995) Eucalyptus: its reputation and its roots. Agroforestry Today 7(1): 6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton W (1976) Windbreak studies on the Canadian prairie. In: Tinus RW (ed) Shelterbelts on the Great Plains, pp 64–68. Proceedings of the Symposium of the Great Plains Agric Council. Denver, Colorado, April 20–22, (1976) GPAC Pub No. 78

  • Pretzschel M, Bohme G and Krause H (1991) Effects of shelterbelts on crop yield. Feldwirtschaft 32(5): 229–231 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri S, Singh S and Kumar A (1994) Growth and productivity of crops in association with an Acacia nilotica tree belt. Special issue: Acacia and Prosopis. Journal of Arid Environments 27(1): 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri S, Bangarwa KS and Singh S (1995) Influence of multipurpose trees on agricultural crops in arid regions of Haryana, India. Journal of Arid Environments 30(4): 441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen SD and Shapiro CA (1990) Effect of tree root-pruning adjacent to windbreaks on corn and soybeans. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45(5): 571–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M, McTainsh G and Leys J (1994) Estimates of dust mass in recent major Australian dust storms. Australian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 7(3): 20–24 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (1996) Contribution of farm forestry to Australia: a quantitative assessment. Part of a three part agroforestry resource kit. RIRDC. Kingston, ACT, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten H (1988) Snow distribution on crop fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23: 363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G (1995) Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 30(1–2): 125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoshin VI, Cherevatyuk BV and Romanov IA (1988) The moisture supply of tree-enclosed fields under a cereal-fallow rotation in the dry steppe of western Siberia Sibirskii Vestnik Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki No. 1: 80–84 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh D and Kohli RK (1992) Reasons of poor under-floor vegetation of Eucalyptus. In: Tauro P and Narwal S (eds) Proceedings of the First National Symposium on Allelopathy in Agroecosystems (agriculture & forestry), pp 114–117. February 12–14, 1992, held at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125 004, India, 1992

  • Song ZM and Wei L (1991) The correlation between windbreak influenced climate and crop yield. In: Zhu ZH, Cai MT, Wang SJ and Jiang YX (eds) Agroforestry Systems in China, pp 21–115. Published jointly with the Chinese Academy of Forestry. Singapore; International Development Research Centre (IDRC, Canada), Regional Office for Southeast & East Asia

  • Srinivasalu and Jaganatham (1992) Microclimatic manipulation and performance of rainfed groundnut with crop shelterbelts. Madras Agricultural Journal 79(10): 587–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturrock JW Redcliff and Judd M (1988) cited in Bird PR (1988) Financial gains of trees on farms through shelter. In: Proc. International Forestry Conference for the Australian Bicentenary, Vol. 2 Australian Forest Development Institute, Albury-Wodonga

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun D and Dickinson GR (1994) A case study of shelterbelt effect on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield on the Atherton Tablelands in tropical north Australia. Agroforestry Systems 25(2): 141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejwani KG (1994) Agroforestry in India. Oxford & IBH Publ. New Delhi, 233 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornley JHM and Johnson IR (1990) Plant and crop modelling: a mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thue-Hansen V and Skjelvag AO (1987) The effects of shelter on climate and barley yield. Norsk Landbruksforskning 1(1): 23–30 (in Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkach LI (1986) Role of shelterbelts in extreme weather conditions. Lesovodstvo i Agrolesomelioratsiya No. 72, 68–71 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC (1997) Further progress in crop water relations. Advances in Agronomy 58: 293–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eimern J, Karschon R, Razumova LA and Robertson GW (1964) Windbreaks and shelterbelts. World Meteorology Organisation Tech. Note No. 59, 191 pp

  • Van Noordwijk M, Spek LY and De Willigen P (1994) Proximal diameters as predictors of total root system size for fractal branching models: I. Theory. Plant and Soil 164: 107–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M and Purnomosidhi P (1995) Root architecture in relation to tree-soil-crop interactions and root pruning in agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 30(1–2): 161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M (1996) Mulch and shade model for optimum alley-cropping design depending on soil fertility, Chap 3. In: Ong CK and Huxley P (eds) Tree-Crop Interactions, A Physiological Approach, pp 51–72. CAB International/ICRAF

  • Van Noordwijk M Lawson G, Soumare A, Groot JJ and Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity, Chap 9. In: Ong CK and Huxley P (eds) Tree-Crop Interactions, A Physiological Approach, pp 319–364. CAB International/ ICRAF

  • Waddington J and Steppuhn H (1995) Effects of Tall Wheatgrass windbreaks on hay production of three alfalfa varieties at a semiarid location in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75(4): 877–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP and Jarvis PG (1990) Description and validation of an array model – MAESTRO. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 51(3–4): 257–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SM, Whitham JA, Bhati UN et al. (1995) Survey of trees on Australian farms: 1993–94, ABARE Research Report 95/7, Canberra

  • Wu YY and Dalmacio RV (1991) Energy balance, water use and wheat yield in a Paulownia-wheat intercropped field. In: Zhu ZH et al. (eds) Agroforestry Systems in China, pp 54–65. CAF/IRDC, 1991

  • Young A and Muraya P (1991) SCUAF: soil changes under agroforestry. Agricultural Systems and Information Technology Newsletter 3: 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevin GN and Labaznikov SB (1990) Increasing the productivity of grasslands Sibirskii Vestnik Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki, No. 6, 30–35, 130

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HH and Song ZM (1991) An evaluation study on a windbreak agricultural field. In: Zhu ZH et al. (eds) Agroforestry Systems in China, pp 50–53. CAF/IRDC

  • Zhang H, Brandle JR, Meyer GE and Hodges L (1995) A model to evaluate windbreak protection efficiency. Agroforestry Systems 29(3): 191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H and Brandle JR (1996) Windbreak effect on biomass and grain mass accumulation of corn: a modeling approach. Agronomy Journal 88: 607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy and Farming Systems, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5371, Australia

    I. K. Nuberg

Authors
  1. I. K. Nuberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuberg, I.K. Effect of shelter on temperate crops: a review to define research for Australian conditions. Agroforestry Systems 41, 3–34 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006071821948

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006071821948

Search

Navigation