Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Framework for the Design of Ecological Monitoring Programs as a Tool for Environmental and Nature Management

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental and nature management can not operate effectivelywithout reliable information on changes in the environment andon the causes of those changes. Ecological monitoring canrepresent an important source of information. However, manyoperational monitoring programs are not very effective, i.e., not very useful for decision-making. We present a conceptualframework for the development and maintenance of effectiveecological monitoring programs. In the decision-making process,two main functions for monitoring can be recognized: an earlywarning and an early control function. Both these functionsrequire a high diagnostic power. This is used as a guideline forthe design process. The design consists of choices concerningmonitoring objectives, objects and variables to be monitored,sampling strategy and design, data collection, data handling, maintenance and organization. Arguments commonly put forward inliterature and in practice to support the various choices aresubjected to a critical analysis. The framework will be helpfulin the design of effective monitoring systems as it avoidsimportant components to be overlooked, clarifies the relationbetween the different components, maximizes the exploitation ofexisting possibilities and opportunities and identifiesshortcomings in advance. This will result in monitoring programsthat should be able to live up to their expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carey, P. D., Preston, C. D., Hill, M. O., Usher, M. B. and Wright, S. M.: 1995, 'An environmentally defined biogeographical zonation of Scotland designed to reflect species distributions', Journal of Ecology 83, 833-845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (ed.): 1986, The Handbook of Ecological Monitoring, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, P.: 1990, 'Biomonitoring and environmental management', Environ. Monit. Assess. 14, 107-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. E.: 1993, 'Design elements of monitoring programs: the necessary ingredients for success', Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 99-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, W. T.: 1992, Environmental science theory. Concepts and methods in a one-world, problem-orientated paradigm, Thesis, Leiden University, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, G. S.: 1994, 'The scientific method revisited', Conservation Biology 8, 596-597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H.: 1974, 'Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas', Scripta Geobotanica IX, Verlag Erich Golze, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. J., Marchant, J. H. and Morgan, R. A.: 1985, 'How representative of agricultural practice in Britain are Common Bird Census farmland plots?', Bird Study 32, 56-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, R. W. and Greenwood, J. J. D. (eds.): 1993a, Birds as Monitors of Environmental Change, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, R.W., Greenwood, J. J. D. and Jarvis, P. J.: 1993b, 'Can birds be used to monitoring the environment?', in R. W. Furness and J. J. D. Greenwood (eds.), Birds as Monitors of Environmental Change, Chapman and Hall. London, pp. 1-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, F. B. (ed.): 1991, Monitoring for conservation and ecology, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. S.: 1980, 'Why do ecological monitoring?', Mar. Pollut. Bull. 11, 62-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. S., Calamari, D., Duce, R., Portman, J. E., Wells, P. G. and Windom, H. L.L 1991, 'Scientifically based strategies for marine environmental protection and management', Mar. Pollut. Bull. 22, 432-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H.: 1984, 'Statistical and nonstatistical considerations for environmental monitoring studies', Environ. Monit. Asses. 4, 293-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H.: 1989, 'Power analysis and practical strategies for environmental monitoring', Environ. Res. 50, 195-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. J. D.: 1996, 'Basic Techniques', in W. J. Sutherland (ed.), Ecological Census Techniques: a Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. J. D., Baillie, S. R., Crick, H. P. Q., Marchant, J. H. and Peach, W. J.: 1993, 'Integrated population monitoring: detecting the effects of diverse changes', in R. W. Furness and J. J. D. Greenwood (eds.), Birds as Monitors of Environmental Change, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 267-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. S., Hughes, M. M., Paul, J. F., Mcaskill, R. S., Rego, S. A., Bender, D. R., Dodge, N. J., Richter, T. H. and Copeland, J. L.: 1998, 'Managing scientific data: the EMAP approach', Environ. Monit. Assess. 51, 429-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellawell, J. A.: 1991, 'Development of a rationale for monitoring', in F. B. Goldsmith (ed.), Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology, Chapmann and Hall, London, pp. 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, R. and Stottlemyer, R.: 1991, 'Long-term monitoring for environmental change in U.S. National Parks: a watershed approach', Environ. Monit. Assess. 17, 51-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, W. T.: 1984, 'Towards monitoring of long-term trends in terrestrial ecosystems', Environ. Conserv. 11, 11-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. L., Bishop, K. A. and Brown, V. M.: 1990, 'Use of biological monitoring in the assessment of effects of mining wastes on aquatic ecosystems of the Alligator Rivers Region, tropical northern Australia', Environ. Monit. Assess. 14, 139-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. K.: 1984, 'Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments', Ecological Monographs 54, 187-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, J. N. R.: 1989, 'Environmental monitoring', Biologist 36, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A.: 1991, 'Biological monitoring and ecological prediction: from nature reserve management to national state of the environmental indicators', in F. B. Goldsmith (ed.), Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 249-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskimies, P.: 1990, 'Trends in birds populations as an environmental indicator', Annali di Stratistica 9, 107-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., Merenlender, A. M. and Murphy, D. D.: 1994, 'Ecological Monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development program in the tropics', Conservation Biology 8, 388-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landres, P. B., Verner, J. and Thomas, J. W.: 1988, 'Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique', Conservation Biology 2, 316-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, L. H. and Smart, A.: 1993, 'Beyond the guidelines: practical lessons for monitoring', Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 203-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, W. A. and Norris, R. H.: 1990, 'Water quality assessment programs in Australia deciding what to measure, and how and where to use bioindicators', Environ. Monit. Assess. 14, 115-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, J. H.: 1994, 'The new Breeding Bird Survey', British Birds 87, 26-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, J. J., Linthurst, R. A. and Overton, W. S.: 1991, 'An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends', Environ. Monit. Assess. 17, 67-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. S., Soulé, M. E. and Doak, D. F.: 1993, 'The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation', BioScience 43, 219-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R., Grant, G. E. and Sullivan, K.: 1995, Watershed analysis as a framework for implementing ecosystem management, Water Resources Bulletin 31, 369-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. L.: 1986, 'Bird populations as indicators of environmental change', Current Ornithology 3, 429-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. L. and Marcot, B. G.: 1995, 'An evaluation of resource inventory and monitoring program used in National Forest Planning', Environmental Management 19, 147-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtaugh, P. A.: 1996, 'The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators', Ecological Applications 6, 132-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musters, C. J. M., de Graaf, H. J. and ter Keurs, W. J.: 1998, 'Defining socio-environmental systems for sustainable development', Ecological Economics 26, 243-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1990, Managing troubled waters: the role of marine environmental monitoring, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F.: 1990, 'Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach', Conservation Biology 4, 355-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, A. R. and Schreuder, H. T.: 1997, 'Perspectives in large-scale natural resource surveys when cause-effect is a potential issue', Environm. Ecol. Stat. 4, 167-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. W.: 1993, 'Potential biases in site and species selection for ecological monitoring', Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 277-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, R. M.: 1990, 'Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management', Can. J. Fish, Aquat. Sci. 47, 2-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, R. M. and M'Goningle, M.: 1992, 'Statistical power analysis and the precautionary principle', Mar. Pollut. Bull. 24, 24, 231-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L.: 1991, The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanki, J., Jeffrey, D. and Hughes, G. M.: 1994, 'Biological monitoring of the environment. A manual of methods', CAB International, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silsbee, D. G. and Peterson, D. L.: 1993, 'Planning for implementation of long-term resource monitoring programs', Environ. Mont. Assess. 26, 177-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe, D. S.: 1992, 'Environmental monitoring for protected areas: review and prospect', Environ. Monit. Assess. 21, 49-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M. F. and Sugden, R. A.: 1988, 'Sampling and assignment mechanisms in experiments, surveys and observational studies', International Statistical Review 56, 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I. F.: 1991, Monitoring ecological change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, S. G.: 1993, 'Data, data everywhere but not a byte to read: managing monitoring information', Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 125-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, B. B.: 1993, 'The good, the bad and the ugle of monitoring programs: defining questions and establishing objectives', Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 91-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W. II.: 1993, 'Environmental Surveillance', in G. W. Suter (ed.). Ecological Risk Assessment, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp. 377-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S. A. and Wiens, J. A.: 1989, 'Bird populations and environmental changes: can birds be bio-indicators?', American Birds 43, 260-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Brink, B.: 1991, 'The AMOEBA approach as a useful tool for establishing sustainable development?', in O. Kuik and H. Verbruggen (eds.), In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 71-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Keurs, W. J. and Meelis, E.: 1986, 'Monitoring the biotic aspects of our environment as a policy instrument', Environ. Monit. Assess. 7, 161-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D.: 1989, 'Ecological experimentation: strengths and conceptual problems', in G. E. Likens (ed.), Long-term Studies in Ecology. Approaches and Alternatives, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 136-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1992, 'Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world', J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 161, 145-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1995, 'Ecological research and (research into) environmental management', Ecological Applications 5, 232-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Strien, A. J., Hagemeijer, E. J. M. and Verstrael, T. J.: 1994, 'Estimating the probability of detecting trends in breeding birds: often overlooked but necessary', in E. J. M. Hagemeijer and T. J. Verstrael (eds.), Bird number 1992. Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of IBCC and EOAC, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg. SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp. 525-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstrael, T. J., Meijer, R. and Daemen, B. A. P. J.: 1990, 'Hoe goed is de BMP-steekproef?', Limosa 63, 153-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, P.: 1992, 'The design of a monitoring network for meadow birds', in E. J. M. Hagemeijer and T. J. Verstrael (eds.), Bird numbers 1992. Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of IBCC and EOAC, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg. SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp. 631-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A.: 1989, 'Spatial scaling in ecology', Func. Ecol. 3, 385-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., Addicot, J. F., Case, T. J. and Diamond, J.: 1986, 'Overview: the importance of spatial and temporal scale in ecological investigations', in J. Diamion and T. J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 154-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, G. B., Sims, R. A., Corns, I. G.W. and Klionka, K. (eds.): 1996, 'Global to local: ecological land classification', Environ. Monit. Assess. 39, special issue.

  • Wiersma, G. B., Dandhu, S., Jackson, L., Austin, K., Hyland, J.,Melzian, B. and Summers, K. (eds.): 1998, 'Monitoring ecological condition at regional scales', Environ. Monit. Assess. 51, nos. 1-2, special issue.

  • Wolfe, D. A., Champ, M. A., Fletcher, D. A. and Mearns, A. J.: 1987, 'Long-term biological data sets: their role in research, monitoring, and management of estuarine and coastal marine system', Estuaries 10, 181-193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9516, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    P. Vos

  2. Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9516, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    E. Meelis & W. J. Ter Keurs

Authors
  1. P. Vos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Meelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. J. Ter Keurs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Vos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vos, P., Meelis, E. & Ter Keurs, W.J. A Framework for the Design of Ecological Monitoring Programs as a Tool for Environmental and Nature Management. Environ Monit Assess 61, 317–344 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006139412372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006139412372

Keywords

Search

Navigation