Abstract
Dispersive mass transport processes in naturally heterogeneous geological formations (porous media) are investigated based on a particle approach to mass transport and on its numerical implementation using LPT3D, a Lagrangian Particle Tracking 3D code. We are currently using this approach for studying microscale and macroscale space–time behavior (advection, diffusion, dispersion) of tracer plumes, solutes, or miscible fluids, in 1,2,3-dimensional heterogeneous and anisotropic subsurface formations (aquifers, petroleum reservoirs). Our analyses are based on a general advection-diffusion model and numerical scheme where concentrations and fluxes are discretized in terms of particles. The advection-diffusion theory is presented in a probabilistic framework, and in particular, a numerical analysis is developed for the case of advective transport and rotational flows (numerical stability of the explicit Euler scheme). The remainder of the paper is devoted to the behavior of concentration, mass flux density, and statistical moments of the transported tracer plume in the case of heterogeneous steady flow fields, where macroscale dispersion occurs due to geologic heterogeneity and stratification. We focus on the case of perfectly stratified or multilayered media, obtained by generating many horizontal layers with a purely random transverse distribution of permeability and horizontal velocity. In this case, we calculate explicitly the exact mass concentration field C(x, t), mass flux density field f(x, t), and moments. This includes spatial moments and dispersion variance σ2 x (t) on a finite domain L, and temporal moments on a finite time scale T, e.g., the “mass variance” of arrival times σ2 T (x). The moments are related to flux concentrations in a way that takes explicitly into account finite space–time scales of analysis (time-dependent tracer mass; spatially variable “flow through” mass). The multilayered model problem is then used in numerical experiments for testing different ways of recovering information on tracer plume migration, dispersion, concentration and flux fields. Our analyses rely on a probabilistic interpretation that emerges naturally from the particle approach; it is based on spatial moments (particle positions), temporal moments (mass weighted arrival times), and probability densities (both concentrations and fluxes). Finally, as an alternative to direct estimations of the flux and concentration fields, we formulate and study the “Moment Inverse Problem.” Solving the MIP yields an indirect method for estimating the space–time distribution of flux concentrations based on observed or estimated moments of the plume. The moments may be estimated from field measurements, or numerically computed by particle tracking as we do here.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ababou, R., Gelhar, L. W., 1990, Self-similar randomness and spectral conditioning: Analysis of scale effects in subsurface hydrology, in Cushnam, J., ed., Dynamics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media: Academic Press, New York, Chap. XIV, 505 p.
Adams, E. E., Gelhar, L. W., 1992, Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 2. Spatial moments analysis: Water Resources Res., v. 28, no. 12, p. 3293–3307.
Bagtzoglou, A. C., Tompson, A. F. B., Dougherty, D. E., 1992, Projection functions for particle-grid methods: Num. Methods for Partial Diff. Eq., 8, p. 325–340.
Bhattacharya, R. N., Gupta, V. K., 1983, A theoretical explanation of solute dispersion in saturated porous media at the Darcy scale: Water Resources Res., v. 19, no. 4, p. 938–944.
Black, T. C., Freyberg, D. L., 1987, Stochastic modeling of vertically averaged concentration uncertainty in a perfectly stratified aquifer: Water Resources Res., v. 23, no. 6, p. 997–1004.
Chatwin, P. C., 1970, The approach to normality of the concentration distribution of a solute in a solvent flowing along a straight pipe: Jour. Fluid Mech., v. 43, part. 2, p. 321–352.
Cvetkovic, V. D., Shapiro, A. M., 1989, Solute advection in stratified formations: Water Resources Res., v. 25, no. 6, p. 1283–1289.
Cvetkovic, V. D., Shapiro, A. M., Dagan, G., 1992, A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations, 2. Incertainty analysis: Water Resources Res., v. 28, no. 5, p. 1377–1388.
Dagan, G., 1983, Comment on “Stochastic modeling of mass transport in a random velocity field” by D. H. Tang, F. W. Schwartz and L. Smith: Water Resources Res., v. 19, no. 4, p. 1049–1052.
Dagan, G., 1985, Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: the inverse problem, Water Resources Res., v. 21, no. 1, p. 65–72.
Dagan, G., 1990, Transport in heterogeneous porous formations: Spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion: Water Resources Res., v. 26, no. 6, p. 1281–1290.
Dagan, G., Cvetkovic, V., Shapiro, A., 1992, A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations, 1. The general framework: Water Resources Res., v. 28, no. 5, p. 1369–1376.
Fadili, A., Ababou, R., Lenormand, R., 1997, Dispersive particle transport: Identification of macroscale behavior in heterogeneous stratified groundwater flows, in Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., ed., Proceedings 3rd Annual Conf. of the Internat. Assoc. Math. Geol., Barcelona, Spain, v. 2, p. 825–829.
Feller, W., 1966, An introduction to probability and its applications: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, v. II, p. 626.
Güven, O., Molz, F. J., Melville, J. G., 1984, An analysis of dispersion in a stratified aquifer: Water Resources Res., v. 20, no. 10, p. 1337–1354.
Harvey, Ch. F, Gorelick, S. M., 1995, Mapping hydraulic conductivity: sequential conditioning with measurements of solute arrival time, hydraulic head, and local conductivity: Water Resources Res., v. 31, no. 7, p. 1615–1626.
Havilland, E. K., 1936, On the momentum problem for distribution functions in more than one dimension: American Jour. Math., v. 58, p. 164–168.
Landau, H., 1987, Maximum entropy and the moment problem: Bull. Am. Math. Soc. v. 16, p. 47–77.
Lévy, P., 1965, Processus Stochastique et Mouvement Brownien: Paris Gauthier-Villars & Cie.
Longman, I. M., 1984, Some aspects of the finite moment problem: Jour. Comput. and Appl. Math., v. 10, p. 141–146.
Lukacs, E., Laha, R. G., 1964, Applications of characteristic functions: Griffin's Statistical Monographs & Courses, no. 14, p. 202.
Matheron, G., DeMarsily G., 1980, Is transport in porous media always diffusive? A counterexample: Water Resources Res., v. 16, no. 5, p. 901–917.
Rajaram, H., Gelhar, L. W., 1993, Plume scale-dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers. 1. Lagrangian analysis in a stratified aquifer: Water Resources Res., v. 29, no. 9, p. 3249–3260.
Raviart, P. A., 1983, Particle approximation of linear hyperbolic equation of the first order, in Numerical Methods in Fluids Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, Chap. I.
Saito, Y., Mitsui, T., 1992, Stability analysis of numerical schemes for stochastic differential equations: Technical Research Report, no. 9202, Nagoya University, Japan.
Salandin, P., Rinaldo, A., Dagan, G., 1991, A note on transport in stratified formations by flow tilted with respect to the bedding: Water Resources. Res., v. 27, no. 11, p. 3009–3017.
Shapiro, A. M., Cvetkovic, V. D., 1988, Stochastic analysis of solute arrival time in heterogeneous porous media: Water Resources Res., v. 24, no. 10, p. 1711–1718.
Van Kampen, N. G., 1961, Apower series expansion of the master equation: Canadian Journal of Physics, v. 39.
Vanmarcke, E., 1983, Random Fields Analysis and Synthesis: MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fadili, A., Ababou, R. & Lenormand, R. Dispersive Particle Transport: Identification of Macroscale Behavior in Heterogeneous Stratified Subsurface Flows. Mathematical Geology 31, 793–840 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007572700358
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007572700358