Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely studied in the literature since its inception in 1978. The methodology behind the classical DEA, the oriented method, is to hold inputs (outputs) constant and to determine how much of an improvement in the output (input) dimensions is necessary in order to become efficient. This paper extends this methodology in two substantive ways. First, a method is developed that determines the least-norm projection from an inefficient DMU to the efficient frontier in both the input and output space simultaneously, and second, introduces the notion of the “observable” frontier and its subsequent projection. The observable frontier is the portion of the frontier that has been experienced by other DMUs (or convex combinations of such) and thus, the projection onto this portion of the frontier guarantees a recommendation that has already been demonstrated by an existing DMU or a convex combination of existing DMUs. A numerical example is used to illustrate the importance of these two methodological extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A. I., and L. M. Seiford. (1993). “The Mathematical Programming Approach to Efficiency Analysis.” In Harold O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, and Shelton S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R., and R. C. Morey. (1986). “The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 32/12, 1613–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., and W. Cooper. (1980). “Management Science Relations for Evaluation and Management Accountability.” Journal of Enterprise Management 2, 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz. (1985). “Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 30/1, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring Efficiency of Decision-making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2/6, 428–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1982). “A Multiplicative Model for Efficiency Analysis.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 16/5, 223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., S. Haag, P. Jaska, and J. Semple. (1992). “Sensitivity of Efficiency Classifications in the Additive Model of DEA.” International Journal of Systems Science 23/5, 789–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., J. Rousseau, and J. Semple. (1995). “Sensitivity of Classifications in the Ratio Model of DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 7/1, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, R. G., and E. Thanassoulis. (1988). “ReducingWeight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 39, 563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, S., and P. Jaska. (1995). “Interpreting Inefficiency Ratings: An Application of Bank Branch Operating Efficiencies.” Managerial and Decision Economics 16, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., C. A. Knox Lovell, and S. Thore. (1993). “Chance-Constrained Data Envelopment Analysis.” Managerial and Decision Economics 14, 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, J. M., and W. C. Rheinbaldt. (1970). Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J., and J. Semple. (1995). “Radii of Classification Preservation in DEA: A Case Study of Program Follow Through.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 46/8, 943–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J., and J. H. Semple. (1993). “Notes: Categorical Outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 39/3, 384–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. (1993). “A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978–1993).” Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, Jati K. (1989). “Nonlinear Measures of Technical Efficiency.” Computers & Operations Research 16/1, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H., and F. Gold. (1985). “Bank Branch Operating Efficiency.” Journal of Banking and Finance 9, 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki. (1994). “Stochastic Frontier Production Analysis: Measuring Performance of Public Telecommunications in 24 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Operational Research 74/3, 466–478.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02163

    Frances X. Frei

  2. Department of Operations and Information Management, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6366

    Patrick T. Harker

Authors
  1. Frances X. Frei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick T. Harker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frei, F.X., Harker, P.T. Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 275–300 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007746205433

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007746205433

Search

Navigation