Skip to main content
Log in

The Future Location of Research and Technology Transfer

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The triple helix model of university-industry-government relations is explicated for the transfer of technology. Drawing upon a broad range of international instances, the stages and phases through which the institutional spheres most relevant to innovation are drawn into a more productive relationship are discussed in comparison to alternative models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, Hugh, 1976, Syntony and Spark: The Origins of Radio, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Philip W. and M. L. Tushman, 1990, ‘Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change', Administratiυe Science Quarterly 35, 604–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian, 1988, ‘Competing technologies', pp. 590–607 in Dosi et al. 1988.

  • Arthur, W. Brian, 1989, 'Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events, Economic Journal 99, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, Wiebe, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch (eds.), 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braczyk, Hans-Joachim, Philip Cooke, and Mertin Heidenreich (eds.), 1998, Regional Innoυation Systems, London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel, John Law, and Arie Rip (eds.), 1986, Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Houndsmill / London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campodall'Oro, Sergio (ed.), Innoυazione E Sυiluppo A Milano. Milano: Associazione Interessi Metropolitani.

  • Davis, Bob, 1998, ‘More Spending on Environment, High Tech Possible', Wall Street Journal, Dec 24 Thurs, p. A.10.

  • Dosi, Giovanni, 1982, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories', Research Policy 11, 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete (eds.), 1988, Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, 1998, ‘Tech Transfer Cornerstone: Passing the Bayh-Dole Act, Part II', Technology Access Report XI (12), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, in press, ‘The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science', Research Policy.

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and Sandra Brisolla, in press, ‘Failure and Success: Industrial Policy in Latin America and Southeast Asia', Research Policy.

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff (eds.), 1997, Uniυersities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of Uniυersity-Industry-Goυrnment Relations, London: Cassell Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff, 1998, ‘The Endless Transition: A “Triple Helix” of University-Industry-Government Relations', Minerυa 36 (3), 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam, Kenneth, 1988, Creating the Computer: Goυernment, Industry and High Technology, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusfeld, Herbert, 1986, The Technical Enterprise: Present and Future Patterns, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Chris and Carlota Perez, 1988, ‘Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behavior', pp. 38–66 in Dosi et al. 1988.

  • Frenken, Koen and Loet Leydesdorff, ‘Scaling Trajectories in Civil Aircraft 1913–1997,’ Research Policy forthcoming.

  • Gago, Mariano, 1996, Minister of Science and Technology, Portugal, Interview with Henry Etzkowitz, Lisbon, November.

  • GUIRR Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, 1996, Industry-Uniυersity Research Collaborations: Report of a Workshop with Industrial Research Institute and Council on Competitiυeness, Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P., 1983, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Thomas P., 1986, ‘The Seamless Web: Technology, Science, Etcetera, Etcetera', Social Studies of Science 16, 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRDAC, 1997, Teaching and Learning: Towards the Learning Society, Brussels: The European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, Robert, 1999, ‘Technology Transfer and Biomedical Industries: A Comparison of the US and Japan', NATO Workshop on ‘Industry as a Stimulator of Technology Transfer', Warsaw and Bialystock, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, Shin-ichi, forthcoming, ‘Applying Audition Systems from the Performing Arts to R & D Funding Mechanisms: Quality Control in Collaboration among the Academic, Public, and Private Sectors in Japan', Research Policy, Triple Helix Special Issue, in preparation.

  • Kuklinski, Antoni, 1996, Production of Knowledge and Dignity of Science, Warsaw: European Institute for Regional and Local Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, David, 1998, The Wealth and Po¨erty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some so Poor, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, Philippe, 1997, ‘Technological Programs in the Euro-pean Union', pp. 33–43 in Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1997.

  • Leydesdorff, Loet and Peter Van den Besselaar (eds.), 1994, Eυolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, London and New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, Loet and Henry Etzkowitz, 1998, ‘The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies', Science and Public Policy 25 (3), 195–203.

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, 1988, ‘Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation', pp. 349–369 in Dosi et al. 1988.

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (ed.), 1992, National Systems of Innoυation, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina, Judith, 1999, ‘How to Boost High Tech in NY Area? It's Academic', Crain's New York Business 15 (2) 11–17, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Maureen D., 1994, Eυolutionary Innoυation: Early Industrial Uses of Genetic Engineering, Linköping: Linkoping Studies in Arts and Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Maureen D., 1997, ‘Emerging Environments in Biotechnology', pp. 60–70 in Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1997.

  • Meske, Werner, 1996, Personal communication to Henry Etzkowitz, Berlin.

  • Mowery, David, 1998, ‘Collaborative R & D: How Effective Is It?’ Issues in Science and Technology, Fall, pp. 37–44.

  • Mustar, Phillippe, 1995, Science & Innoυation: Annuaire Raisonne de la Création d'Enterprises par les Chercheurs, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, Frances and E. Noma, 1985, ‘Is Technology Becoming Science?’ Scientometrics 7, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter, 1982, An Edυolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. (ed.), 1993, National Innoυation Systems: A Comparati¨e Study, New York: Oxford University Press.υ

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev, A. R & D in Social Reproduction, Moscow: Progress Publishers.

  • Oenehara, M., 1998, Director of Research NEC, Interview with Henry Etzkowitz and Kenneth Pechter, Tokyo, March.

  • Orsenigo, Luigi, 1989, The Emergence of Biotechnology, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, David, 1988, Laboratories of Democracy: A New Breed of Goυernor Creates Models for National Growth, Boston: Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonski, Guilhermy Ary, 1993, Cooperacion Empresa-Uniυersidad En Iberoamerica, Sao Paulo: CYTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, Slavo, 1998, ‘The Transformation of National Systems of Innovation in Eastern Europe: Between Restructuring and Erosion', Industrial and Corporate Change 7 (1), 77–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richta, Radovan, et al., 1968, Ciυilizace na rezcesti, Prag Frankfurt a.M.: Makol, 1971.

  • Rosa Pires, Artur Da, and Eduardo Anselmo de Castro, 1997,’ Can a Strategic Project for a University Be Strategic to Regional Development?’ Science and Public Policy 24, 15]20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan, 1976, ‘Selection and Adaptation in the Transfer of Technology: Steam and Iron in America: 1800–1870', in Perspecti¨es on Technology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, Roy and Walter Zegveld, 1981, Industrial Inno¨ation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Jorge, 1994, ‘El origen de algunas de mis idea', in Repensando la Politica Technologica Homenaje a Jorge Sabato, Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Vision, pp. 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Allen, 1993, Technopolis: High Technology Industry and Regional Deυelopment in Southern California, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorlin, Sverker, 1998, Personal communication to Henry Etzkowitz, London, December.

  • Tushman, M. L. and Philip W. Anderson, 1986, ‘Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments’, Administrati υScience Quarterly 31, 436–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessuri, Hebe, 1998, Personal communication to Henry Etzkowitz, Caracas, May.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. The Future Location of Research and Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer 24, 111–123 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007807302841

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007807302841

Keywords

Navigation