Abstract
A contingent valuation survey about a reduction of the eutrophication of the Baltic Sea provided data about respondents' motives for their answers to the willingness to pay question. A categorization of the motives allowed an identification of protesters against the valuation scenario. The categorization also illustrated that a teleological ethical perspective is not shared by all respondents and that some respondents perceive human indirect use of ecosystems.
References
Cummings, R. G. and G. W. Harrison (1995), 'The Measurement and Decomposition of Nonuse Values: A Critical Review', Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 225–247.
Gren, I.–M., C. Folke, K. Turner and I. Bateman (1994), 'Primary and Secondary Values of Wetland Ecosystems', Environmental and Resource Economics 4, 55–74.
Gren, I.–M., T. Söderqvist, F. Wulff, S. Langaas, M. Sandströmand C. Folke (1996), 'ReducedNutrient Loads to the Baltic Sea: Ecological Consequences, Costs and Benefits'. Beijer Discussion Paper Series No. 83, The Beijer Institute, Stockholm.
Hanley, N. and J. Milne (1996), 'Ethical Beliefs and Behaviour in Contingent Valuation Surveys', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 39, 255–272.
Söderqvist, T. (1996a), 'Contingent Valuation of a Less Eutrophicated Baltic Sea'. Beijer Discussion Paper Series No. 88, The Beijer Institute, Stockholm.
Söderqvist, T. (1996b), 'Motives for People's Willingness (or Reluctance) to Pay for a Reduced Eutrophication of the Baltic Sea'. Mimeo, The Beijer Institute, Stockholm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Söderqvist, T. Why Give up Money for the Baltic Sea? – Motives for People's Willingness (or Reluctance) to Pay. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 249–254 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008261509412
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008261509412