Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endogenous growth theory has rekindled interest in the role of innovation in determining long-term economic growth. Generally, this body of literature has ignored the contribution of natural resources to growth or the role of innovation in overcoming resource scarcities. The latter problem has been a focus of resource economics for many years, but innovation is usually modelled as exogenous rather than endogenous technological change. Recent investigations in political economy have additionally suggested that the ‘supply’ of innovation may itself be constrained by resource scarcities, especially in the developing world. The following paper attempts to bridge these theoretical gaps through the formal analysis of two issues: First, a simple ‘Romer-Stiglitz’ model of endogenous growth with resource scarcity and population growth is developed to determine the optimal ‘balanced’ growth path for the economy. Second, the basic model is extended to allow for the possibility of resource availability constraining the supply of innovation, so that in the long run innovation net of any resource constraint is zero. However, under the latter conditions it is still possible to avoid resource exhaustion and thus achieve a constant level of per capita consumption in the long run. The paper therefore demonstrates that endogenous growth can overcome resource scarcity, but the outcome in the long run depends critically on assumptions concerning any constraints imposed by resource availability on the generation of innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K. (1997), ‘Are Resource-Abundant Economies Disadvantaged?’, Seminar Paper 97–03. Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (1994), ‘Natural Capital and the Economics of Environment and Development’, in A. M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke and R. Costanza, eds., Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. and T. Homer-Dixon (1996), ‘Resource Scarcity, Institutional Adaptation, and Technical Innovation: Can Poor Countries Attain Endogenous Growth?’, Occasional Paper, The Project on Environment, Population and Scarcity, University of Toronto and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. and A. Markandya (1990), ‘The Conditions for Achieving Environmentally Sustainable Development’, European Economic Review 34, 659–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-I-Martin (1995), Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. and S. Smulders (1995), ‘Environmental Quality and Pollution-Augmenting Technological Change in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model’, Journal of Public Economics (57), 369–391.

  • Boyce, J. (1987), Agrarian Impasse in Bengal: Institutional Constraints to Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. S. and G. E. Heal (1979), The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R. T. (1994), ‘Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries’, Land Economics 70(4), 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golleti, F. (1994), The Changing Public Role in a Rice Economy Approaching Self-Sufficiency: The Case of Bangladesh. IFPRI Research Report 98. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradus, R. and S. Smulders (1993), ‘The Trade-Off Between Environmental Care and Long-Term Growth — Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models’, Journal of Economics 58(1), 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1996), ‘Rent Dissipation, Free Riding, and Trade Policy’, European Economic Review 40, 795–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994), ‘Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases’, International Security 19(1), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1995), ‘The Ingenuity Gap: Can Poor Countries Adapt to Resource Security’, Population and Development Review 21(3), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. F., J. H. Boutwell and G. W. Rathjens (1993), ‘Environmental Change and Violent Conflict’, Scientific American (February), 38–45.

  • Homer-Dixon, T. F. and V. Percival (1996), Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict: Briefing Book. The Project on Environment, Population and Security, The Project on Environment, Population and Scarcity, University of Toronto and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer and D. N. Weil (1992), ‘A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, K. (1992), ‘Agricultural Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Economic Growth’, Journal of Economic Theory 58, 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musu, Land Lines, M. (1995), ‘Endogenous Growth and Environmental Preservation’, in G. Boero and A. Silberston, eds., Environmental Economics: Proceedings of European Economic Associations at Oxford, 1993. London: St Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack, H. (1994), ‘Endogenous Growth Theory: Intellectual Appeal and Empirical Shortcomings’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and G. Tabellini (1990), Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics. Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics 38, Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, S. (1991), ‘Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 99(3), 500–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy 98(5), S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1994), ‘The Origins of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. and A. W. Warner (1995), ‘Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth’, Development Discussion Paper No. 517a. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schou, P. (1996), ‘A Growth Model with Technological Progress and Non-Renewable Resources’, mimeo. University of Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Economics.

  • Smulders, S. (1995), ‘Entropy, Environment and Endogenous Growth’, International Tax and Public Finance 2, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, S. and R. Gradus (1996), ‘Pollution Abatement and Long-Term Growth’, European Journal of Political Economy 12, 505–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1994), ‘Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths’, Review of Economic Studies. Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, pp. 123–138.

  • Wallich, P. (1994), ‘The Analytical Economist: The Wages of Haiti’s Dictatorship’, Scientific American 271(6), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withagen, C. (1991), ‘Topics in Resource Economics’, in F. van der Ploeg, ed., Advanced Lextures in Quantitative Economics, Academic Press, London, pp. 381–419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbier, E.B. Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity. Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 51–74 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008389422019

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008389422019

Navigation