Abstract
Ratio estimation of the parametric mean for a characteristic measured on plants sampled by a line intercept method is presented and evaluated via simulation using different plant dispersion patterns (Poisson, regular cluster, and Poisson cluster), plant width variances, and numbers of lines. The results indicate that on average the estimates are close to the parametric mean under all three dispersion patterns. Given a fixed number of lines, variability of the estimates is similar across dispersion patterns with variability under the Poisson pattern slightly smaller than varia-bility under the cluster patterns. No variance estimates were negative under the Poisson pattern, but some estimates were negative under the cluster patterns for smaller numbers of lines. Variance estimates become closer to zero similarly for all spatial patterns as the number of lines increases. Ratio estimation of the parametric mean in line intercept sampling works better, from the viewpoint of approximate unbiasedness and variability of estimates, under the Poisson pattern with larger numbers of lines than other combinations of spatial patterns, plant width variances and numbers of lines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler, S. and McDonald, L.L. (1983) Unbiased systematic sampling plans for the line intercept method. Journal of Range Management, 36, 463–8.
Diggle, P.J. (1983) Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns, Academic Press, New York.
Gregoire, T.M. and Monkevich, N.S. (1994) The reflection method of line intercept sampling to eliminate boundary bias. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1, 219–26.
Horvitz, D.G. and Thompson, D.J. (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–85.
Kaiser, L. (1983) Unbiased estimation in line intercept sampling. Biometrics, 39, 965–76.
Lucas, H.A. and Seber, G.A.F. (1977) Estimating coverage and particle density using line intercept method. Biometrika, 64, 618–22.
McDonald, L.L. (1980) Line intercept sampling for attributes other than coverage and density Journal of Range Management, 44, 530–3.
Muttlak, H.A. and McDonald, L.L. (1992) Ranked set sampling and the line intercept method: a more efficient procedure Biometrical Journal, 34, 329–46.
Muttlak, H.A. and Sadooghi-Alvandi, S.M. (1993) A note on the line intercept sampling method Biometrics, 49, 1209–15.
Pontius, J.S. (1998) Estimation of the mean in line intercept sampling. Technical Report Series II, Theory and Methods, II–98–3. Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS 66506.
Ripley, B.D. (1981) Spatial Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. (1992) Model Assisted Survey Sampling, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Statistical Sciences. (1995) S-Plus Users Manual, Statistical Sciences, Inc., Seattle.
Thompson, S.K. (1992) Sampling, Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pontius, J.S. Estimation of the mean in line intercept sampling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5, 371–379 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009607905906
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009607905906