Abstract
Problems involving electromagnetic interference (EMI) with electronic medical equipment are well-documented. However, no systematic investigation of EMI has been done. We have systematically investigated the causes of EMI. The factors involved in EMI were determined as follows: 1) Electric-field intensity induced by invasive radio waves from outside a hospital. 2) Residual magnetic-flux density at welding points in a building. 3) Electric-field intensity induced by conveyance systems with a linear motor. 4) The shielding capacity of hospital walls. 5) The shielding capacity of commercial shields against a wide range frequency radio waves. 6) The immunity of electronic medical equipment. 7) EMI by cellular telephone and personal handy-phone system handsets.
From the results of our investigation, we developed a following practical procedure to prevent EMI. 1) Measurement of electric-field intensity induced by invasive radio waves from outside the hospital and industrial systems in the hospital. 2) Measurement of residual magnetic-flux density at electric welding points of hospital buildings with steel frame structures. 3) Control of the electromagnetic environment by utilizing the shielding capacity of walls. 4) Measurement of the immunity of electronic medical equipment. And 5) Installation of electronic gate equipment at the building entrance to screen for handsets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anonymous, Radiofrequency interference with medical devices. IEEE Eng. Med. Biomed. Mag. 17(3):111–114, 1998.
Dwyer, D., Medical device adverse events and electromagnetic interference. Intl. J. Trauma Nurs. 5(1):19–21, 1999.
Association of Radio Industries and Business, Japan, Electromagnetic Compatibility Conference Research Report of the Usage of Radio-Communication Equipment Such As Cellular Telephone Terminals, Apr. 1997.
Foster, K., Soltys, M., and Arnofsky, S., Foster, K., Soltys, M., Arnofsky, S., Doshi, P., Hanover, D., Mercado, R., and Cshleck, D., Radiofrequency field surveys in hospitals. Biomed. Instr. Tech. 30(2):155–159, Mar.-Apr. 1996.
Hanada, E., Kodama, K., Takano, K., Watanabe, Y., and Nose, Y., Possible electromagnetic interference with electronic medical equipment by radio waves coming from outside the hospital. J. Med. Syst. 25(4):257–267, 2001.
Hanada, E., Takano, K., Mishima, H., Kodama, K., Antoku, Y., Watanabe, Y., and Nose, Y., Possibility of electromagnetic interference with electronic medical equipment by residual magnetization in a building with a steel structure. IEEE EMC Newsletter, Issue No. 189, 15–19, Spring 2001.
Hanada, E., Watanabe, Y., and Nose, Y., Electromagnetic interference with electronic medical equipment induced by automatic conveyance systems. J. Med. Syst. 24(1):11–20, 2000.
Hanada, E., Watanabe, Y., Antoku, Y., Kenjo, Y., Nutahara, H., and Nose, Y., Hospital construction materials: Poor shielding capacity with respect to signals transmitted by mobile telephones. Biomed. Instr. Tech. 35(4):489–496, 1998.
Hanada, E., Takano, K., Watanabe, Y., and Nose, Y., Shielding capacity of fabrics and metal-spray against 1 to 2.45 GHz radio waves. Biomed. Instr. Tech., in press.
Hanada, E., Antoku,Y., Tani, S., Kimura, M., Hasegawa, A., Urano, S., Ohe, K., Yamaki, M., and Nose, Y., Electromagnetic interference to medical equipment by low power mobile telecommunication system. IEEE Trans. EMC 42(4):470–476, 2000.
Hanada, E., Watanabe,Y., and Nose,Y., Ascreening gate to prevent entry of mobile telephone handsets in the speaking/stand-by mode into prohibited and restricted areas. IEEE Trans. ITB 4(4):320–323, 2000.
Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, Japan, Recent Trends in Mobile Telephones andPHS(Spot report), 2000. http://www.mpt.go.jp/eng/Releases/Telecommunications/news001012°1.html.
Hoolihan, D. D., Medical device electromagnetic interference-ANSI Issues Professional Program Proceeding. Electronics Industries Forum of New England, 123–130, 1997.
VIFKA, Netherlands, Recommendations Regarding the Use of Pocket TelephonesWithin Health Care Institutions, Sept. 1995.
Health Protection Branch, Canada, Digital Cellular Phone Interference With Cardiac Pacemakers Medical Devices, Alerts, I.L., No. 108, Nov. 1995.
US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Medical Devices, Electromagnetic Compatibility Standard For Medical Devices, FDA MDS-201–0004, Oct. 1979.
International Electrotechnical Commission, International Standard IEC 601–1–2 Medical electrical equipment Part 1: General requirements for safety 2. Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility-requirements and tests, 1993.
Silberberg, J., Performance Degradation of Electronic Medical Devices Due To Electromagnetic Interference, Compliance Engineering, Fall 1993.
Williams, R., Keeping medical devices safe from electromagnetic interference, FDA Consumer, p. 1, May 1995.
Silberberg, J., What can/should we learn from reports of medical device electromagnetic interference? Electromagnatics, Health Care and Health, EMBC 95, pp. 19–20, Sept. 1995.
The Wireless Technology Research, L.L.C., U.S.A., A Clinical Study To Assess The Potential For Hand-Held Wireless Telephones To Interfere With Implanted, Pacemakers, Aug. 1995.
Hanada, E., Takano, K., Antoku, Y., Matsumura, K., Kenjo, Y., Watanabe, Y., and Nose, Y., Advantages of low output mobile communication systems in hospitals. J. Med. Syst. 24(2):53–539, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanada, E., Takano, K., Antoku, Y. et al. A Practical Procedure to Prevent Electromagnetic Interference with Electronic Medical Equipment. Journal of Medical Systems 26, 61–65 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013094904976
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013094904976