Abstract
Scholars have argued that the history of science should be included in the science curriculum because it provides meaningful perspective about scientific concepts, processes, and context. This article begins with a review of efforts to humanize science education by including the history of science, and a review of the rationale for including the history of science in the science education curriculum. The authors then synthesize a conceptual framework for examining the role of the history of science in science education. The framework is organized around realms in the history of science: a) conceptual understanding, b) procedural understanding, and c) contextual understanding, and includes approximately 3 sub-elements within each realm. The framework has been used previously to study the inclusion of the history of science in high school physics textbooks (Wang 1998). In this study, it is used to examine the perceptions and practices of elementary and secondary school teachers in using the history of science in their classrooms. Thirty-eight teachers completed a questionnaire which used Likert scale items to assess their perception of the value of the history of science, and practice in using it in their classroom. A sub-set of teachers were then interviewed to understand the interconnection of these views in more detail. Teachers believe that the inclusion of the history of science should not be used for elementary school students. Teachers who believe in and practice the inclusion of the history of science identify many benefits for their students. However, they believe that it is difficult to include the procedural realm of understanding. The authors conclude that humanizing science isn't a matter of making it fun so much as making it a human and meaningful endeavor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge, B.: 1992, ‘Project on Scope, Sequence, and Coordination: A New Synthesis for Improving Science Education’,Scope, Sequence, and Coordination of Secondary School Science, 2: Relevant Research, NSTA, Washington DC.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K.: 1996, ‘Reform by the Book: What is–or might be–the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform?’, Educational Researcher 25(9), 6-8.
Bandura, A. & Walters, R. H.: 1963, Social Learning and Personality Development, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Becker, B. J.: 1997, ‘MindWorks: Making Scientific Concepts Come Alive’, Paper presented at the 1997 History of Science Society Annual Conference, November, 1997. La Jolla, California.
Brush, S. G.: 1974, ‘Should the History of Science be Rated “X”?’, Science 18, 1164-1172.
Bybee, R. W.: 1996, ‘The Contemporary Reform of Science Education’, in J. Rhoton and P. Bowers (eds), Issues in Science Education, NSTA, Arlington, VA, pp. 1-14.
Champagne, A. & Klopfer, L. E.: 1982, ‘Actions in a Time of Crisis’, Science Education 66(4), 503-514.
Conant, J. B.: 1951, On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach, New American Library, New York.
Conant, J. B.: 1957, Harvard Case History in Experimental Science, Vols. 1 & 2, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Conant, J. B.: 1964, ‘Introduction’, in J. B. Conant and L. K. Nash (eds), Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science, (1), vii-xvi.
DeBoer, G. E.: 1991, A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice, Teachers College Press, New York.
Duschl, R. A.: 1990, Restructuring Science Education: The Important of Theories and Their Development, Teacher College Press, New York.
Duschl, R. A.: 1994, ‘Research on the History and Philosophy of Science’, in D. L. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 443-465.
Dyson, F.: 1985, Origins of Life, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Fowler, F. J.: 1993, Survey Research Methods (7th Ed.), SAGE, Newbury Park, CA.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W. & Yekovich, F. R.: 1993, The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning, Harper Collins College Publisher, New York.
Giannetto, E., Tarsitani, C. & Missoni, M. V.: 1991, ‘The Relations between Epistemology, History of Science & Science Teaching from the Point of View of the Research on Mental Representations’, in D. E. Herget (ed.), More History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching, Florida State University, FL, pp. 359-374.
Griffiths, A. K. & Barry, M.: 1993, ‘High School Students’Views about the Nature of Science’, School Science and Mathematics 93(1), 35-37.
Holton, G.: Personal communication, November 8, 1997.
Hurd, P. D.: 1973, ‘Integrated Science’, The Science Teacher 40(2), 18-19.
Kaplan, A.: 1964, The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science, Chandler, San Francisco, CA.
Klopfer, L. E.: 1969, ‘The Teaching of Science and the History of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6, 87-95.
Klopfer, L. E. & Watson, F. G.: 1957, ‘Historical Materials and High School Science Teaching’, The Science Teacher 24, 264-265, 292–293.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kyle, W. C.: 1991, ‘Curriculum Development Projects of the 1960s’, Research within Research: Science Education 3-24.
Mascolo, R.: 1969, ‘Performance in Conceptualizing: Relationship between Conceptual Framework and Skills of Inquiry’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6, 29-35.
Matthews, M. R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, NY.
Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. & Whitley, R.: 1977, The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, MA.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M.: 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd Ed, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
National Commission on Excellence in Education: 1983, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
National Research Council: 1996, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
National Science Teachers Association: 1982, Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980's, Author, Washington.
New Standards: 1997, Performance Standards, Vol. 1, Vol. 2, and Vol. 3, National Center on Education and the Economy, Washington, DC.
Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T. & Gale, C. W.: 1966, ‘Scientific Literacy: Its Referents’,The ScienceTeacher 33, 44.
Piaget, J.: 1970, Genetic Epistemology, Columbia University Press, New York.
Quattropani, D. J.: 1977, An Evaluation of the Effect of Harvard Project Physics on Student Understanding of the Relationships among Science, Technology, and Society, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Rutherford, F. J. & Ahlgren, A.: 1990, Science for all Americans: Scientific Literacy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rutherford, F. J., Holton, G. & Watson, F. G.: 1970, Harvard Project Physics, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C. & Raizen, S. A.: 1997, A Splintered Vision: Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Boston.
Schwab, J. J.: 1960, ‘What do Scientists do?’, Behavioral Science 5, 1-27.
Schwab, J. J.: 1962, ‘The Teaching of Science as Enquiry’, in J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (eds), The Teaching of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3-102.
Schwab, J. J.: 1963, Biology Teacher's Handbook, Wiley, New York.
Schwab, J. J.: 1964, ‘Science as Enquiry’, in G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (eds), The Structure of Knowledge and the Curriculum, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Snow, C. P.: 1962, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Villani, A. & Arruda, S.: 1998, ‘Special Theory of Relativity, Conceptual Change and History of Science’, Science and Education 7(1), 85-100.
Wandersee, J. H.: 1990, ‘On the Value and Use of the History of Science in Teaching Today's Science: Constructing Historical Vignettes’, in D. E. Herget (ed.), More History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, pp. 278-283.
Wandersee, J. H.: 1985, ‘Can the History of Science Help Science Educators Anticipate Students' Misconceptions?’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23, 581-597.
Wang, H. A.: 1998, Science in Historical Perspectives: A Content Analysis of the History of Science in Secondary School Physics Textbooks, Doctoral dissertation for the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Wang, H. A. & Marsh, D. D.: 1998, ‘Content Analysis of Curriculum Conceptions in the Science Standards Documents’, Paper submitted to Science Education.
Wartofsky, M. W.: 1968, Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought, Macmillan, New York.
Welch, W. W.: 1973, ‘Review of the Research and Evaluation Program of Harvard Project Physics', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 10, 365-378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H.A., Marsh, D.D. Science Instruction with a Humanistic Twist: Teachers' Perception and Practice in Using the History of Science in Their Classrooms. Science & Education 11, 169–189 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014455918130
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014455918130