Skip to main content
Log in

COLLEGE CHEATING IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a survey onacademic dishonesty given to samples of 392 American and276 Japanese college students in 1994 and 1995. Our datarevealed both cross-cultural differences and similarities in cheating behavior andattitudes. Compared to American students, Japanesestudents reported a higher incidence rate of cheating onexams, a greater tendency to neutralize (i.e., justify) cheating, and a greater passivity in theirreactions to the observed cheating of others. Amongcheaters of both nationalities, Japanese students ratedsocial stigma and fear of punishment as less effective in deterring cheating than did Americanstudents. Our data also revealed cross-culturalsimilarities. Among noncheaters of both nationalities,guilt was the most effective deterrent. Among cheatersof both nationalities, fear of punishment was the mosteffective deterrent. And students of both cultures,cheaters and noncheaters alike, viewed social stigma asthe least effective deterrent to cheating. In both cultures, most students react to cheating byignoring it, about one-third react by resenting it, andactive reactions (i.e., reporting the cheating orconfronting the cheater) were seldom reported.Explanations for cross-cultural differences are suggested,and implications of these findings for efforts to reducecheating are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Davis, S., and Ludwigson, H. W. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology22: 119-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Grover, C., Becker, A., and McGregor, L. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology19: 16-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E., Clark, R., Williams, L., and Francis, B. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education37: 487-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Roper, J., Gonzales, C., and Simpson, R. (1988). Analysis of cheating on academic assignments. The Psychological Record38: 543-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, D., and Pavela, G. (1994). Issues and Perspectives on Academic Integrity2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrator s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genereux, R., and McLeod, B. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education36: 687-704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E., and Clark, R. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education25: 342-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R., and Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1996). Academic dishonesty and the perceived effectiveness of countermeasures: An empirical survey of cheating at a major public university. NASPA Journal33: 292-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maramark, S., and Maline, M. (1993). Academic Dishonesty Among College Students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, K., and Loyd, B. (1993). Academic dishonesty: The honor system and students' attitudes. Journal of College Student Development34: 125-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry62: 365-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., and Trevino, L. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education64: 522-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., and Trevino, L. (1996). What we know about cheating in college. Change28: 28-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J., and Miethe, T. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly70: 872-875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulvers, K. (1997). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environm ent. Unpublished master' s thesis, Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shincho-shya (1992). Daigaku yo tou. Tokyo: Shincho-shya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G., and Matza, D. (1959). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Association22: 664-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, P. (1987). The Japanese. New York: Truman Talley Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. (1997). Gender differences in students' rational decisions to cheat. Deviant Behavior18: 393-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D., Beck, W. (1990). Gender and dishonesty. Journal of Social Psychology130: 333-339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diekhoff, G.M., Labeff, E.E., Shinohara, K. et al. COLLEGE CHEATING IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES. Research in Higher Education 40, 343–353 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018703217828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018703217828

Keywords

Navigation