Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Public Cultural Expenditures: An Exploratory Time Series Analysis for Austria

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Austria calls itself a ``cultural nation'' as the arts, the performing arts (theaters) and museums, in particular, play an important role in public debate. However, the question arises as to whether public cultural expenditures as an indication of the significance of cultural policy are really as important when compared to other policy fields as political parties and the government try to suggest. A time series of public cultural expenditures for the period from 1967 to 1998 is taken as a basis for testing econometrically whether public expenditures (measured primarily as the ratio to GDP) follow a growth path. Based on tests for the stationarity of the time series of cultural expenditures in Austria, there are empirical indications that cultural expenditures, gross domestic product (GDP) and the relative price index (GDP and government expenditures) are cointegrated. Further econometric estimations (error-correction models) show that cultural expenditures increase with growing GDP but are vulnerable to short term fluctuations. Additionally, ``Baumol's cost disease'' adds to the long-term growth of cultural expenditures. In the past the growth path of cultural expenditures has been stable and independent of the ideology of ruling parties, the form of government and political business cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1995). “The Political Economy of Budget Deficits”. IMF Staff Papers 42(1): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1984). “Subsidies to the Arts with Multiple Public Donors”. The Economic Record 60(12): 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1987). “A Mission Renewed: The Survival of the National Endowment for the Arts, 1981¶ 1983”. Journal of Cultural Economics 11(1): 22–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1996). “Children of Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20(2): 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. and Bowen, W.G. (1966). Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. Twentieth Century Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. and Murphy, K.M. (1988). “A Theory of Rational Addiction”. Journal of Political Economy 96(4): 675–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille Hansen, T. (1997). “The Willingness-to-Pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a Public Good”. Journal of Cultural Economics 21(1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • BKA (Bundeskanzleramt, Kunstsektion) (1999). Cultural Solutions ¶Austrian EU Presidency 1998. Vienna.

  • BKA (Bundeskanzleramt, Kunstsektion) (2000). Kunstbericht 1999, Bericht über die Kunstförderung des Bundeskanzleramtes. Vienna.

  • BMBWK (Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kunst) (2000). Kulturbericht 1999. Vienna.

  • BMUK (Bundesministerium für Unterricht und kulturelle Angelegenheiten) (1999). Kulturbericht 1998. Vienna.

  • Bonato, L., Gagliardi, F., and Gorelli, S. (1990). “The Demand for Live Performing Arts in Italy”. Journal of Cultural Economics 10(2): 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. (1986). “The Supply and Demand for Cinema Tickets: Some U.K. Evidence”. Journal of Cultural Economics 10(1): 38–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijgelshoven, P. (1992). “Trends in Art Policy: The Dutch Case”, in R. Towse and A. Khakee (eds.), Cultural Economics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, M.V. (1992). “On the Assumed Inelasticity of Demand for the Performing Arts”. Journal of Cultural Economics 16(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1996). “Has Baumol's Cost Disease Disappeared in the Performing Arts?”. Ricerche Economiche 50(2): 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1999). “State Support and Creativity in the Arts: Some New Considerations”. Journal of Cultural Economics 23(1): 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (2000). Arts and Economics: Analysis and Cultural Policy. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (1992). Capitalism and Communication. SAGE Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzner, M., Glatzer, E. and Neck, R. (2001). “On the Sustainability of Austrian Budgetary Policies”. Empirica 28(1): 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzner, M. and Neck, R. (2002). “Das Wachstum der Staatsausgaben in Österreich”, in E. Theurl (ed.), Kompendium der österreichischen Finanzpolitik. Innsbruck (forthcoming).

  • Grampp, W.D. (1989). “Rent-Seeking in Arts Policy”. Public Choice 60(1): 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C.M. (1993). The Economics of Art and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlacher, F. (1984). Kultursubventionen. Peter Lang, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, M. (1996). “The Impact of Cultural Economics on Economic Theory”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20(4): 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration ¶with Applications to the Demand for Money”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 51(2): 169–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khakee, A. (1988). “The Rationale for Urban Government Action for Arts Funding”. Journal of Cultural Economics 12(1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, S. and Pommerehne, W. (1995). “Politico-Economic Interactions of German Public Performing Arts Institutions”. Journal of Cultural Economics 19(1): 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggewie, C. (1991). “Konservative Kultur-Politik?”, in D. Rustemeyer and J. Wittpoth (eds.), Kultur im Spannungsfeld von Wirtschaft und Politik. Analytica Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokre, M. (1997). How Do Policy-Makers Behave in Times of Structural Changes? Austrian Cultural Policy as a Case Study. Research Memorandum 9705, Institut für Finanzwissenschaft und öffentliche Wirtschaft, Universität Graz.

  • Neck, R. and Schneider, F. (1988). “The Growth of the Public Sector in Austria: An Exploratory Analysis”, in J.A. Lybeck and M. Henrekson (eds.), Explaining the Growth of Government. Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam, pp. 231–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, D. (1992). “Cultural Policy in an Era of Budgetary Stringency and Fiscal Decentralization: The U.S. Experience”, in R. Towse and A. Khakee (eds.), Cultural Economics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, J.W. (1996). “Accesss to and Participation in the Arts: The Case of Those with Low Incomes/Educational Attainment”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20(3): 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oteri, M. and Trimarchi, M. (1990). “Public Subsidies and Cultural Habitus: An Empirical Test of Drama Attendance”. Rivista di diritto finanziario e scienza delle finanze 49(4): 524–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. and Scott, A. (2000). “The Curious Attraction ofWagner's Law”. Public Choice 102(1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. and Wiseman, J. (1961). The Growth of Government Expenditures in the United Kingdom. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1991). Econometric Models and Econometric Forecasts. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. (1982). “Steuern, Staatsausgaben und Stimmbürgerverhalten”. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 197(5): 438–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.C. (1997). “I Hear America Singing, The ArtsWill Flower without the NEA”. Policy Review (March/April): 27–45.

  • Roubini, N. and Sachs, J.D. (1989). “Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies”. European Economic Review 33(6): 903–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G.G. and Rose, A. (1998). “Public Orchestra Funding in Germany ¶an Empirical Investigation”. Journal of Cultural Economics 22(3): 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G.G. and Ursprung, H.W. (2000). “La donna e mobile ¶or Is She? Voter Preferences and Public Support for the Performing Arts”. Public Choice 102(1), 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.M. (1999). “The Other Side of the Subsidized Muse: Indirect Aid Revisited”. Journal of Cultural Economics 23(1): 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, B.A. (1981). “Economic Theory and the Positive Economics of Arts Financing”. American Economic Review 71(2): 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistik Austria (2001). Cultural Expenditures, Data from the ISIS Database. Vienna.

  • Throsby, D.C. and Whithers, G.A. (1979). Economics of the Performing Arts. Arnold, London/ Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (1994). “Achieving Public Policy Objectives in the Arts and Heritage”, in A. Peacock and I. Rizzo (eds.), Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vautravers-Busenhart, I. (1998). Kultur-oder Sparpolitik? Eine ökonomische und institutionelle Analyse für die Schweiz. Rüegger, Chur/Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, B. (1996). “Zwischen Mängelverwaltung, Strukturreformen und neuem Selbstverständnis”. Die Neue Gesellschaft, Frankfurter Hefte 2: 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Weiß buch” (1999). Weiß buch zur Reform der Kulturpolitik in Österreich. Bundeskanzleramt, Kunstsektion, Vienna.

  • Withers, G.A. (1979). “Private Demand for Public Subsidies: An Econometric Study of Cultural Support in Austrialia”. Journal of Cultural Economics 3(1): 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, G.A. (1980). “Unbalanced Growth and the Demand for Performing Arts: An Econometric Analysis”. Southern Economic Journal 40(6): 735–742.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Getzner, M. Determinants of Public Cultural Expenditures: An Exploratory Time Series Analysis for Austria. Journal of Cultural Economics 26, 287–306 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019976717566

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019976717566

Navigation