Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of organisation in changing landscapes: implications for the management of biodiversity

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the widespread need to predict and assess the effects of landscape change on biodiversity, the array of tools available for this purpose is still limited. Species’ patterns and human activities such as land use respond to the environment on their own suite of scales in space and time so that their interactions are overlapping but complex. It is difficult, therefore, to relate biodiversity to patterns described solely by metric assessments of spatial heterogeneity. In this methodological paper, we therefore propose consideration of two measures of landscape organisation which focus on the relationships between different properties of the landscape system (e.g., soil type distribution, land use distribution), rather than on their description alone. Alpha organisation measures the degree to which the distribution of features such as land use deviate from a random distribution, measured here as fractal dimension from the semivariogram of a variable describing agricultural intensity. Beta organisation measures the degree of deviation by which the spatial distribution of one property (e.g., human land use) is independent of the distribution of another (e.g., soil type) and was derived from relative mutual information (= redundancy) between the ‘agricultural land use’ and ‘soil types’. These measures are illustrated in a rural landscape of the lower Seine valley, at two scales of observation, and at two dates (1963 and 1999) separated by substantial agricultural change due the European Common Agricultural Policy (= CAP). The results show that analysis of patterns of agricultural activity across a range of spatial scales (α organisation), or across the pattern of spatial variation in soil types (β organisation) reveal how the agricultural actors respond to environmental constraints at different scales. This organisation concept relates to the metastability of landscape systems, and suggest possible correlation between high values of landscape organisation and high levels in biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alard, D. and Poudevigne, I. 1999. Factors controlling plant diversity in a rural landscape: a functional approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 46: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M. and Van Eetvelde, V. 2000. Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W.L. 1995. Longterm response of disturbance landscapes to human intervention and global change. Landscape Ecology 10: 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balent, G., Alard, D., Blanfort, V. and Gibon, A. 1998. Activités de pâturage, paysages et biodiversité. Annals de Zootechnique 47: 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., Amoros, C., Piegay, H., Tachet, J. and Hein, T. 1998. Ecological complexity of wetlands within a river landscape. Biological Conservation 85: 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1981. Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. and McDonnell, R.A. 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, V.I. and Thomas, J.M. 1992. A comparison of quantitative methods for examining landscape pattern and scale. Landscape Ecology 7: 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V.H. 1997. The relationship between land-use change and climate change. Ecological Applications 7: 753–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pablo, C.L., Agar, P.M., Gomez Sal, A. and Pineda, F.D. 1988. Descriptive capacity and indicative value of territorial variables in ecological cartography. Landscape Ecology 1: 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decaens, T. and Jiménez, J.J. in press. Earthworm communities under an agricultural intensification gradient in Colombia. Plant and Soil.

  • Dutoit, T. and Alard, D. 1996. Les pelouses calcicoles du Nord Ouest de l’Europe. Ecologie 27: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. 1993. The species pool hypothesis and plant community diversity. Oikos 68: 371–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigon, A. and Leutert, A. 1996. The Dynamic keyhole-key model of coexistence to explain diversity of plants in limestone and other grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller, K.E., Beare, M.H., Lavelle, P., Izac, A.M.N. and Swift, M.J. 1997. Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agrosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology 6: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girel, J. 1994. Old distribution procedure of both water and matter fluxes in floodplains of western Europe: impact on present vegetation. Environmental Management 18: 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godron, M. and Forman, R.T.T., 1983. Landscape modification and changing ecological characteristics. In: H.A.G. Mooney, M. (Editor), Disturbance and Ecosystems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E.J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.M.R. 1995. The current status of European wetland inventories and classifications. Vegetatio 118: 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M.A. 1994. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Biological Diversity 3: 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A.R., Wiens, J.A., Milne, B.T. and Crist, T.O. 1992. Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology 7: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.D., Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. 2001. Characterising watershed delineated landscapes in Pennsylvania using conditional entropy profiles. Landscape Ecology 16: 597–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A.G. and Huijbregts, C.J. 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, J. and Pickett, S.T.A. 1989. Ecological systems and the concept of biological organisation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 8837–8841.

  • Kolasa, J. and Rollo, C.D. 1991. Introduction: The heterogeneity of heterogeneity: a glossary. Ecological Heterogeneity 86: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, B.S. and Dickman, C.R. 1998. The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, A., Prairie, Y.T. and Bergeron, Y. 1994. Fractal dimension estimates of a fragmented landscape: sources of variability. Landscape Ecology 9: 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. 1999. Towards a science of ecological management. Conservation Ecology 3: 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and Reynolds, J.F. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73: 280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. 1992. Scale and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evolutionary Ecology 6: 412–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. 2000. High-risk ecosystems as foci for considering biodiversity and ecological integrity in ecological risk assessments. Environ. Sci. Pol. 3: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V. et al. 1996. Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landscape Ecology 11: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. 1988. Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetatio 75: 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannatier, Y. 1996. Variowin Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA, 88 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, M. 1981. Entropy and community pattern analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 93: 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, M., 1991. Diversity in anthropogenic ecological systems: the landscape level. In: M.A.C. F.D. Pineda, J.M. deMiguel, and J. Montalvo (Eds), Diversidad Biologica-Biological Diversity. Fondation Ramon Areces, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, M. 1994 (revised December 1999). PEGASE operation manual.

  • Pickett, S.T.A. and Cadenasso, M.L. 1995. Landscape Ecology: Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems. Science 269: 331–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poudevigne, I., Van Rooij, S.A.M., Morin, P. and Alard, D. 1997. Dynamics of rural landscapes and their main driving factors: a case study in the Seine valley, Normandy, France. Landsc. Urban Planning 38: 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poudevigne, I., Alard, D., Leuven, R.S.E.W., and Nienhuis, P. 2002. A systems approach to river restoration: a case study in the lower Seine Valley, France. River Research and Applications 18: 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta, C. 2000. From theoretical to statistical physics and back: self similar landscape metrics as a synthesis of ecological diversity and geometrical complexity. Ecological Modelling 125: 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. and White, P.S. 1994. Scale dependence and the species-area relationship. American Naturalist 144: 717–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.A. and Sutherland, W.J. 2002. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R.E., Mulla, D.J., Journel, A.G. and Franz, E.H. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modelling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecological Monographs 62: 277–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, M.J. et al., 1996. Biodiversity and agrosystem function. In: J.H.C. H.A. Mooney, E. Medina, O.E. Sala, E.D. Schulze (Eds), Functional Roles of Biodiversity: a Global Perspective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.J., O’Neill, R.V., Conley, W., Conley, M.R. and Humphries, H.C., 1991. Pattern and scale: Statistics for landscape ecology. In: M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner (Eds), Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 17–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M. et al. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7: 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.V. 1998. Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation 83: 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. et al. 1997. Assessing risks to biodiversity from future landscape change. Biological Conservation 11: 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Van Horne, B. and Ims, R.A. 1993a. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Van Horne, B. and Ims, R.A. 1993b. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • With, K.A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecology 9: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With, K.A., Gardner, R.H. and Turner, M.G. 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78: 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, J.L. and Currie, D.J. 1993. Species-energy theory and patterns of species richness: I. patterns of bird, angiosperm, and mammal species richness of islands. Biological Conservation 63: 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernoult, A., Bureau, F. & Poudevigne, I. Patterns of organisation in changing landscapes: implications for the management of biodiversity. Landscape Ecol 18, 239–251 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024457031235

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024457031235

Navigation