Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing Admissions to an Intensive Care Unit

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a model for optimizing admissions to an intensive care unit (ICU) where the objective is to maximize the expected incremental number of lives saved from operating the ICU. The probability distribution of the number of occupied ICU beds is modeled using queueing theory. Three different admissions policies are considered: first come first served (FCFS), first come first served for all referrals whose expected incremental survival benefits gained from ICU admission exceed some hurdle (FCFS-H), and first come first served for all referrals whose expected incremental survival benefits exceed a bed specific hurdle (BSH) that depends upon the number of occupied beds (FCFS-BSH). The model is applied to data describing patients referred to the ICU at Jerusalem's Hebrew University – Hadassah Hospital. After statistically estimating the distribution of expected incremental survival benefits among those referred to the ICU, we show that if only those referrals where ICU admission would improve the probability of survival by at least 19.4 percentage points were admitted, an additional 18 statistical lives would be saved annually compared to the FCFS policy, a relative life saving improvement of 17.9%. Implementing the more complex optimal bed specific hurdle policy would save an additional 1.4 statistical lives annually beyond what can be achieved with FCFS-H, a marginal improvement of only 1.2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ESICM, Consensus conference: Predicting outcome in ICU patients, Intensive Care Medicine 20 (1994) 390-397.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee, Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients, Journal of the American Medical Association 271 (1994) 1200-1203.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.A. Knaus, E.A. Draper, D.P. Wagner and J.E. Zimmerman, APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system, Critical Care Medicine 13 (1985) 818-829.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Kleinrock, Queueing Systems, Theory, Vol. I (Wiley, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.L. Miller and A.G. Buckman, Cost allocation and opportunity costs, Management Science 33 (1987) 626-639.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.L. Sprung, D. Geber, L.A. Eidelman et al., Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission, Critical Care Medicine 27 (1999) 1073-1079.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Shmueli and C. Sprung, Assessing the survival benefits of intensive care, submitted for publication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shmueli, A., Sprung, C.L. & Kaplan, E.H. Optimizing Admissions to an Intensive Care Unit. Health Care Management Science 6, 131–136 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024457800682

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024457800682

Navigation