Skip to main content
Log in

EEG-Based Communication and Control: Speed–Accuracy Relationships

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People can learn to control mu (8–12 Hz) or beta (18–25 Hz) rhythm amplitude in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. In our current EEG-based brain–computer interface (BCI) system, cursor movement is a linear function of mu or beta rhythm amplitude. In order to maximize the participant's control over the direction of cursor movement, the intercept in this equation is kept equal to the mean amplitude of recent performance. Selection of the optimal slope, or gain, which determines the magnitude of the individual cursor movements, is a more difficult problem. This study examined the relationship between gain and accuracy in a 1-dimensional EEG-based cursor movement task in which individuals select among 2 or more choices by holding the cursor at the desired choice for a fixed period of time (i.e., the dwell time). With 4 targets arranged in a vertical column on the screen, large gains favored the end targets whereas smaller gains favored the central targets. In addition, manipulating gain and dwell time within participants produces results that are in agreement with simulations based on a simple theoretical model of performance. Optimal performance occurs when correct selection of targets is uniform across position. Thus, it is desirable to remove any trend in the function relating accuracy to target position. We evaluated a controller that is designed to minimize the linear and quadratic trends in the accuracy with which participants hit the 4 targets. These results indicate that gain should be adjusted to the individual participants, and suggest that continual online gain adaptation could increase the speed and accuracy of EEG-based cursor control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1988). Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70, 510-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastaut, H. (1952). Etude electrocorticographique de la reactivite des rythmes rolandiques. Revenue Neurology, 87, 76-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, W. N. (1978). EEG feedback training: Enhancement of somatosensory cortical activity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 290-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. P., Huggins, J. E., BeMent, S. L., Kushwaha, R. K., Schuh, L. A., Rohde, M. M., et al. (2000). A direct brain interface based on event-related potentials. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8, 180-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marple, S. L. (1987). Digital spectral analysis with applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: NewJersey, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. J., Lefkowicz, T., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1997). Design and operation of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) with digital signal processing technology. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 337-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. J., McCane, L. M., David, S. V., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1997). Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 103, 386-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. J., McCane, L. M., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1998). EEG-based communication and control: Short-term role of feedback. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6, 7-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. J., Neat, G. W., Read, R. F., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1993). An EEG-based method for graded cursor control. Psychobiology, 21, 77-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, L. A., McFarland, D. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1998). Answering questions with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 1029-1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelmouter, J., & Birbaumer, N. (2000). A binary spelling interface with random errors. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8, 227-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R. (1980). An introduction to Information Theory. (pp. 145-165). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfurtscheller, G., & Berghold, A. (1989). Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 250-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfurtscheller, G., Flotzinger, D., & Kalcher, J. (1993). Brain-computer interface—A new communication device for handicapped persons. Journal of Microcomputer Applications, 16, 293-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramoser, H., Wolpaw, J. R., & Pfurtscheller, G. (1997). EEG-based communication: Evaluation of alternative signal prediction methods. Biomedizinische Technik, 42, 226-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharbrough, F., Chatrian, C. E., Lesser, R. P., Luders, H., Nuwer, M., & Picton, T. W. (1991). American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 8, 200-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, E. E. (1992). The brain response interface: Communication through visually guided electrical brain responses. Journal of Microcomputer Applications, 15, 31-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principals in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw, J. R., McFarland, D. J., & Cacace, A. T. (1986). Preliminary studies for a direct brain-to-computer parallel interface. In Projects for persons with disabilities, IBM Technical Symposium (pp. 11-20). White Plains, NY: IBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw, J. R., McFarland, D. J., Neat, G. W., & Forneris, C. A. (1991). An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 252-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw, J. R., & McFarland, D. J. (1994). Multichannel EEG-based brain-computer communication. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 444-449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis J. McFarland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McFarland, D.J., Wolpaw, J.R. EEG-Based Communication and Control: Speed–Accuracy Relationships. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28, 217–231 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024685214655

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024685214655

Navigation