Skip to main content
Log in

Valuing the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over recent years the Canadian government has struggled to determine how muchmoney should be spent on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), itspublic service broadcaster. At the same time, regulators and CBC managementhave struggled with what types of programming services it should provide.Traditionally, the citizen's role in public broadcasting decision making hasbeen limited to an occasional submission at a hearing or a response to apublic opinion survey. However, willingness-to-pay stated preference choiceexperiments could be an effective, low cost means of obtaining more detailedcitizen's input. Here, we report findings from a national survey of Canadianhouseholds in which contingent valuation and choice experiment data are usedto estimate use and non-use values of the various programming servicesprovided by the CBC. The results are used to address policy and programmingissues facing the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowitz, Wictor, Boxall, Peter, Williams, Michael, and Louviere, Jordan (1998) “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (February): 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpizar, Francisco, Carlsson, Fredrik, and Martinsson, Peter (2001) Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. Working Papers in Economics No. 52, Gothenburg University.

  • Buckland, S.T., Macmillian, D.C., Duff, E.I., and Hanley, N. (1999) “Estimating Mean Willingness to Pay from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies”. The Statistician 48: Part 1: 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBC (1999) CBC Annual Report 1998–1999.

  • Cave, Martin, Copley, Geoff, and Hanney, Steve (1995). “Setting Quality Standards in the Public Sector: Some Principles and an Application”. Public Money & Management 15 (January–March): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Catherine M., Chambers, Paul E., and Whitehead, John C. (1998) “Contingent Valuation of Quasi-Public Goods: Validity, Reliability and Application to Valuing a Historic Site”. Public Finance Review 26 (March): 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, Alan, O'Brien, Bernie and Gafni, Amiram (1998) “Health Care Contingent Valuation Studies: A Review and Classification of the Literature”. Health Economics 7 (June): 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Andrew and Mills, Paul (1990) Viewers' Willingness to Pay. Broadcast Research Report, International Thomson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, Adam, McFadyen, Stuart, Hoskins, Colin and Hupfer, Maureen (2001) “Quantifying the Sources of Value of a Public Service”. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 20 (Fall): 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul and Srinivasan, V. (1990) “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research: New Developments and Directions”. Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. Michael (1984) “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (August): 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. Michael and Kanninen, Barbara (1999) “The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data”, in I.J. Bateman and K.G. Willis (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, Nick, MacMillan, Douglas, Wright, Robert, E., Bulock, Craig, Simpson, Ian, Parsisson, Dave, and Crabtree, Bob (1998) “Contingent Valuation versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49 (January): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, David A. (1992) “The Use of Discrete Choice Models in the Determination of Community Choices in Public Issue Areas Impacting on Business Decision Making”. Journal of Business Research 24 (May): 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, Colin and McFadyen, Stuart (1992) “The Mandate, Structure and Financing of the CBC”. Canadian Public Policy 18 (September): 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, C. and McFadyen, S. (1995) Cost Savings through Restructuring of the CBC. Winning paper submitted to the 1994–95 Fraser Institute Economy in Government Competition.

  • Hoskins, Colin, McFadyen, Stuart, and Finn, Adam (2001) “Refocusing the CBC”. Canadian Journal of Communication 26 (Winter): 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Bruce K. and Whitehead, John C. (2000) “Value of Public Goods from Sports Stadiums: The CVM Approach”. Contemporary Economic Policy 18 (January): 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, Jordan (1988) Analyzing Decision Making. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-67, Beverly Hills.

  • Louviere, Jordan (1996) “Relating Stated Preferences Measures and Models to Choices in Real Markets: Calibration of CV Responses”, in David J. Bjornstad and James R. Kahn (eds.), The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, Jordan J., Hensher, David A., and Swait, Joffre, D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press.

  • McConnell, K.E. (1995) “Consumer Surplus from Discrete Choice Models”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onoe, Hisao, Sakamoto, Yasuo, and Arai, Hirosuke (1993) “A Cost Benefit Analysis of Television Broadcasting”. Studies of Broadcasting 29 (March): 93–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock Committee (1986) Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, Walter and Signorello, Giovanni (2000) “Contingent Valuation of a Cultural Public Good and Policy Design: The Case of “Napoli Musei Aperti”. Journal of Cultural Economics 24 (August): 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwer, R. Keith and Daneshvary, Rennae (1995) “Willingness to Pay for Public Television and the Advent of ‘Look-Alike’ Cable Television Channels: A Case Study”. Journal of Media Economics 8(3): 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, David (1994) “The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics”. Journal of Economic Literature 32 (March): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finn, A., McFadyen, S. & Hoskins, C. Valuing the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Journal of Cultural Economics 27, 177–192 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026352903371

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026352903371

Navigation