Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis is a well-established method of endogenous tissue engineering. It is a biological process of bone neo-formation between segments subjected to tension. The concept of this study was to investigate the distraction osteogenesis with a device capable of creating a permanent and constant force during the whole process as if a very large number of small elongations were applied constantly. The mechanical testing of the device used to produce the constant force and the in vivo analysis of the bone growth after it was implanted in rabbits are presented on this work. The device consists of a NiTi coil spring, superelastic at body temperature, in order to have a stress plateau during the austenitic retransformation during the unloading. The in vivo analysis was made on six female rabbits of 12 months old. A segmental mandibulectomy at the horizontal arm of the mandible and a corticotomy at 5 mm distant from the gap were made. Next, following a latency period of five days, the SMA springs were implanted to induce the bone neo-formation. The displacement at the unloading plateau shows that it is necessary to have longer springs or to use several (available commercially) in series in order to fulfil the requirements of a human distraction. The temperature variations induced changes in the spring force. However, when the temperature returns to 37 °C the distraction force recovers near the initial level and does so completely when the distraction process continues. For the in vivo study, all six rabbits successfully completed the distraction. The radiographies showed the gap as distraction advanced. A continuity in the newly formed bone with similar transversal and horizontal dimensions than the original bone can be observed on the histologies. In conclusion, the application of a constant force on distraction osteogenesis, using SMA springs, may be a successful alternative to the conventional gradual distraction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. L. Samehukov, A. M. CherlÍashin and J. B. Cope, in “Distraction Osteogenesis and Tissue Engineering”, Vol. 34, edited by J. A. Me Namara Jr and C. A. Trotman (Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1998) pp. 1-35.
A. Codivilla, Am. J. Orthop. Surg. 2 (1905) 353.
G. A. Ilizarov and L. M. Soybelman, Exp. Khir. Arrestar. 14 (1969) 27.
J. G. Mccarthy, D. A. Staffenberg, R. J. Wood, C. B. Cutting, B. H. Grayson and C. H. Thorne, Plast Reconstr. Surg. 96 (1995) 978.
M. Kremer, M. Butsch, D. Genecov Mschnell and K. Salyer, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Cranial and Facial Bone Distraction Processes.
Neoformacion osea mandibular mediante aleaciones de memoria de forma, Tesis Doctoral-A, Arcas-Barcelona, 2000.
G. Airoldi, G. Riva, M. Vanelli, V. Filippi and G. Garanttini, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 112 (1997) 58.
S. A. Schendel and J. H. Heggard, J. Craniomaxillofac. surg. 7 (1996) 465.
G. Airoldi, A. Corsi and F. Fiorentini, J. Phys. IV Fr. 7 (1997).
T. W. Duerig, K. N. Melton, D. Stoeckel and C. M. Wayman, in “Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys” (Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, 1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Idelsohn, S., Peña, J., Lacroix, D. et al. Continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis using superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA). Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 541–546 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021135.72288.8f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021135.72288.8f