Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Stubborn Logic of Regular Gamblers: Obstacles and Dilemmas in Cognitive Gambling Research

  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive studies into gambling behaviour have shown that many gamblers misinterpret the odds of gambling activities, hold false beliefs about skill and luck, and over-estimate their subjective chances of success. Accordingly, providing accurate information about gambling in venues, or on slot-machines, would appear to be a sensible way to enhance the ‘safety’ of gambling products. Unfortunately, such ideas for educating gamblers may be difficult to implement in practice because of limitations and conceptual dilemmas in the cognitive literature. Irrational beliefs about gambling may be difficult to falsify, are often highly idiosyncratic and context-bound, and may stem more from the selective misuse of information than from a lack of knowledge about gambling activities. Drawing evidence from recent research into gambling-related cognitions, this paper examines the key elements of irrational-belief systems, and how this work might usefully inform the design of future consumer information initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G., & Brown, R.I.F. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 405-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., Walker, M., Sagris, A., & Dickerson, M. (1997). Psychological aspects of gambling paper. Position paper prepared for the Directorate of Social Issues, Australian Psychological Society.

  • Bouts, P. & van Avermaet, J. (1992). Drawing familiar or unfamiliar cards: stimulus familiarity, chance orientation, and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 331-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.I.F. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 1001-1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.M. (1991). The effects of desire for control in situations with chance determined outcomes: gambling behaviour in lotto and bingo players. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 196-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1972). Psychological probability or the art of doubt. London: George, Allen & Urwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D. The molecular genetics of pathological gambling. CNS Spectrum, 3, 20-37.

  • Corney, W.J., & Cummings, W.T. (1985). Gambling behavior and information processing biases. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 1, 111-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, K., & Norman (1998). Arousal, erroneous verbalizations and the illusion of control during a computer-generated gambling task. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 629-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P.H. (1998). A psychological investigation of gambling in South Australia: with particular reference to the cognitive and behavioural determinants of regular poker/slot machine gambling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Adelaide, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P.H. (2000). Gender differences in Australian gambling: a critical summary of sociological and psychological research. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 35, 145-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P.H., & Winefield, A.H. (1999a). Poker machine gambling: an analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P.H., & Winefield, A.H. (1999b). The danger of over-explanation in psychological research. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 447-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P.H., & Winefield, A.H. (2000). Predictors of irrational thinking in slot-machine gambling. Journal of Psychology, 134, 17-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M.G. (1984). Compulsive gamblers. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M.R., Hayes, L.J., & Ebbs, R.E. (1998). Engaging in “illusory control” during repeated risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 83, 959-962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (1953). Probability preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 349-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1988). Irrational thinking and gambling. In Eadington, W.R. (Ed.) Gambling research: proceedings of the seventh international conference on gambling and risk taking, Reno: University of Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1981). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: beyond heuristics and biases. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110-1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L, & Carlton, P.L. (1988). Hemispheric EEG correlates of compulsive behavior: the case of pathological gamblers. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavior, 13, 103-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M.D. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of the structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 101-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M.D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351-369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M.D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M.D., & Delfabbro, P.H. (2001). The biopsychosocial approach to the study of gambling. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues (Feature article), 5, 1-33, www.camh.net/egambling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1997). Familial and social influences on juvenile gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 179-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroon, K., & Derevensky, J. (2001). Social influences involved in children's gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 191-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henslin, J.M. (1967). Craps and magic. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 316-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., & Chiu, C. (1988). Sex, locus of control, and illusion of control in Hong Kong as correlates of gambling involvement. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 667-673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keren, G., & Wagenaar, W.A. (1985). On the psychology of playing blackjack; normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 114, 133-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Mayrand, M., Dussault, R., Letarte, A., & Tremblay, J. (1984). Illusion of control: effects of participation and involvement, Journal of Psychology, 117, 47-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Tourigny, M., & Mayrand, M. (1986). Familiarity, group exposure and risk-taking in gambling. The Journal of Psychology, 120, 45-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Gaboury, A., Dumont, D, & Rochette, P. (1988). Gambling: relationship between the frequency of wins and irrational thinking. Journal of Psychology, 122, 409-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J. (1975). The Illusion of Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads you win, tails it's chance: the illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951-955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, R. (2000). Optimism and illusion of control in gambling. Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 12, 18-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loba, P., Stewart, S.H., Klein, R.M., & Blackburn, J.R. (2002). Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: Effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblers, 297-320.

  • Matute, H. (1995). Human reactions to uncontrollable outcomes: further evidence for superstitions rather than helplessness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 142-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, W.P., & Hraba, J. (1991). Age and gambling behavior: a declining and shifting pattern of participation. pattern of participation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 313-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (1999). Australia's gambling industries. Canberra: Federal Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M.E.P., Abramson, L.Y., Semmel, A., & Von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 242-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solonsch, M. (1991). The complete guide to Australian gambling. Wrightbooks Pty. Ltd., Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.C., Armstrong, W., & Thomas, C. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123,143-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T, Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsanos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 253-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Slovic, P. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W.A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. England: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.B. (1992a). The Psychology of Gambling, Pergamon Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.B. (1992b). Irrational thinking among slot machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 245-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.B., Sturevska, S., & Turpie, D. (1995). The quality of play in Australian casinos. Paper presented at the seventh conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Fremantle, Western Australia.

  • Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N.D., & Klein, W.M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, A.H. (1966). Negative recency and event dependence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 47-54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Nth. Tce., South Australia, 5005

    Paul Delfabbro

Authors
  1. Paul Delfabbro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Delfabbro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delfabbro, P. The Stubborn Logic of Regular Gamblers: Obstacles and Dilemmas in Cognitive Gambling Research. J Gambl Stud 20, 1–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0

Search

Navigation