Abstract
The article investigates the different types of social mechanisms responsible for the interdependence of couples' reproductive preferences predicted by diffusion models of fertility and family behavior. We analyze the transcripts of in-depth interviews carried out with 54 women in the northern part of Italy. The rich information on observations and conversations about fertility and family choices with relatives and peers enables us to distinguish four different ways in which social interaction influences reproductive preferences, namely social learning, social pressure, subjective obligation and contagion. Second, we show how the efficacy of each mechanism affecting fertility behavior depends on the kind and the structure of personal relationships involved in the interaction. Finally, we discuss the ways in which individual attitudes and values associated with the transition to parenthood are produced and negotiated in face-to-face interactions, and the importance of focusing on the process of preference-formationand modification for understanding fertility behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbagli, M., Castiglioni, M. & Dalla Zuanna, G. (2003), Fare famiglia in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Barbelet, J.M. (2001[1998]), Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure. A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berger, P.L. & Kellner, H. (1970), Marriage and the construction of reality, pp. 50–72 in H-P.-Dreitzel (ed.), Recent Sociology No. 2: Patterns of Communicative Behavior. London: Macmillan.
Bernardi, L. (2002), Personal relationships and reproductive choices: Evidence from a low fertility context, Ph.D. Dissertation. Universita' di Roma La Sapienza and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
Billari, F. & Kohler, H.-P. (2000), The impact of union formation dynamics on first births in West Germany and Italy: Are there signs of convergence? Working Paper. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
Billari, F. & Wilson, C. (2001), Convergence towards diversity? Cohort dynamics in the transition to adulthood in contemporary Western Europe. Working Paper. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
Bledsoe, C. (2002), Contingent lives. Fertility, Time, and Aging in West Africa. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bledsoe, C., Banja, F. & Hill, A. (1998), Reproductive mishaps and western contraception: An African challenge to fertility theory, Population and Development Review 24(1): 15–57.
Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. & Jakobi, L. (1998), Evidence for a spatial diffusion of contraception at the onset of the fertility transition in Victorian Britain, Population: An English Selection 10(1): 181–204.
Bongaarts, J. & Watkins, S. (1996), Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions, Population and Development Review 22: 639–682.
Bowen, G., Richman, J. & Bowen, N. (2000), Families in the context of communities across time, pp. 117–128 in S. Price, P. McKenry & M. Murphy (eds.), Families Across Time. A Life Course Perspective. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Bulatao, R.A. (1981), Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions, Demography 18: 1–25.
Campbell, E. (1985), The Childless Marriage. London: Tavistock Publications.
Cleland, J. & Wilson, C. (1987), Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view, Population Studies 41(1): 5–30.
Dalla Zuanna, G. (2001), The banquet of Aeolus. A familistic interpretation of Italy's lowest low fertility, Demographic Research 4(5): 133–162.
Del Boca, D. (2002), The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy, Population Economics 15(3): 549–573.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), The Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Festinger, L. (1973[1957]), Teoria della Dissonanza Cognitiva. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Filippucci, P. (2000), A place in the world. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge, Department of Social Anthropology.
Hernes, G. (1972), The process of entry into first marriage, American Sociological Review 37 (April): 173–182.
Homans, G.C. (1961), Social Behavior. Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.
Huinink, J. (2001), The macro-micro-link in demography: Explanations of demographic change, Discussion Paper. Presented at the Euroconference The Second Demographic Transition, Bad Herrenalb, 23–28 June.
Kiernan, K. (1998), Parenthood and family life in the United Kingdom, Review of Population Studies and Social Policy 7: 63–81.
Kiernan, K. (1999a), Childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe, Population Trends 98(Winter): 11–19.
Kiernan, K. (1999b), Cohabitation inWestern Europe, Population Trends 96(Summer): 25–32.
Knippenberg, D. van (2000), Prototypicality and persuasion, pp. 157–170 in D. Terry & M. Hogg (eds.), Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context. The Role of Norms and Group Membership. London: Lawrence Elbaum.
Knodel, J. & van de Walle, E. (1979), Lessons from the past: policy implications of historical fertility studies, Population and Development Review 5(2): 217–245.
Kohler, H.-P. (2001), Fertility and Social Interaction. An Economic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Micheli, G. (2000), Kinship, family and social networks, Demographic Research 3 (article 13).
Montgomery, M.R. & Casterline, J.B. (1993), The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models, Population Studies 47(3): 457–479.
Montgomery, M.R. & Casterline, J.B. (1996), Social learning, social influence and new models of fertility, pp. 151–175 in J.B. Casterline, R.D. & K.A. Foote (eds.), Population and Development Review (Supplement 22: Fertility in the United States: new patterns, new theories).
Morgan, P. & King, B.R. (2001), Why have children in the 21st century? Biological predisposition, social coercion, rational choice, European Journal of Population 17: 3–20.
Moscovici, S. & Personnaz, B. (1980), Studies in social influence, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16: 270–282.
Nazio, T. & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2002), The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. Working Paper. Globalife.
Palloni, A. (1998), Theories and models of diffusion in sociology. Working paper. University of Wisconsin. Centre for Demography and Ecology.
Pearce, D. & Bovagnet, F.-C. (2001), The demographic situation in the European Union, Population Trends 104(Summer): 6–11.
Pollak, R. & Watkins, S. (1993), Cultural and economic approaches to fertility: proper marriage or misalliance?, Population and Development Review 19(3): 467–496.
Preston, S. (1986), Changing values and falling birth rates, pp. 176–195 in K. Davis, M.S. Bernstam & R. Ricardo-Campbell (eds.), Population and Development Review (Supplement 12: Below-replacement fertility in industrial societies: causes, consequences, policies).
Rindfuss, R., Morgan P. & Swicegood, G. (1988), First Births in America. Changes in the time of parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rutemberg, N. & Watkins S. (1997), The buzz outside the clinics: Conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya, Studies in Family Planning 28(4): 290–307.
Santini, A. (1995), Continuita' e discontinuita' nel comportamento riproduttivo delle donne italiane nel dopoguerra: tendenze generali della fecondita' nelle coorti nelle ripartizioni tra il 1952 ed il 1991. Working Paper. Universita' degli Studi di Firenze. Dipartimento di Statistica.
Townsend, N., ed. (2002), The Package Deal. Marriage, Work and Fatherhood in Men's Lives. Philadelphia: Temple.
Upton, R. (2000), The next one changes everything: Parental adjustment to the second child among middle-class American families. Working Paper. University of Michigan, Center for the Ethnography of Everyday Life.
Watkins S. (1987), The fertility transition: Europe and the third world compared, Sociological Forum 2(4): 645–673.
Watkins, S. (1986), Conclusions, pp. 420–449 in A Coale & S. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernardi, L. Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review 22, 427–555 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000020892.15221.44
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000020892.15221.44