Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring Multiple Aspects of Fire Signatures for Discriminating Fire Detection

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous researchers are exploring multisensor detection as the principal means of discriminating between fire and nuisance sources. Multisensor detectors can monitor multiple aspects of a wide variety of signatures produced by flaming fires, non-flaming fires, and nuisance sources. This paper describes one program of small- and large-scale experiments that has been conducted using a prototype advanced fire detector with multiple gas sensors. An elementary analysis is applied to demonstrate that spacing guidance can be rationally developed for multiple gas sensors to detect fires of a particular threshold fire size, i.e., heat release rate. Discriminating between flaming fires, non-flaming fires, and nuisance sources could be achieved using either a threshold concentration or CO2 rate-of-rise to identify flaming fires and a CO or CO2 rate-of-rise for non-flaming fires. Time to detection was also compared to commercial smoke detectors, and the reductions in time were noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall, J. R., ‘The Latest Statistics on U.S. Home Smoke Detectors,’ Fire Journal, 83:1 (1989), pp. 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grosshandler, W. L., ‘A Review of Measurements and Candidate Signatures for Early Fire Detection,’ NISTIR 5555, Gaithersburg, MD, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thuillard, M., ‘New Methods for Reducing the Number of False Alarms in Fire Detection Systems,’ Fire Technology, 30:2 (1994), pp. 250–268.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luck, H. ‘Remarks on the State of the Art in Automatic Fire Detection,’ Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fire Detection—AUBE '95, Duisberg Germany, April 4, 1995.

  5. Pfister, G., ‘Multisensor/Multicriteria Fire Detection: A New Trend Rapidly Becomes State of the Art,’ Fire Technology, 33:2 (1997), pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fire Detection—AUBE'95, Duisberg Germany, April 4, 1995.

  7. Ishii, H., Ono, T., Yamauchi, Y., and Ohtani, S, ‘Fire Detection System by Multi-Layered Neural Network with Delay Circuit,’ Fire Safety Science-Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium, 1994, pp. 761–772.

  8. Heskestad, G. and Newman, J. S., ‘Fire Detection Using Cross-Correlations of Sensor Signals,’ Fire Safety Journal, 18:4 (1992), pp. 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meacham, B. J., ‘International Developments in Fire Sensor Technology,’ Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 6:2 (1994), pp. 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meacham, B. J., ‘The Use of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Signal Discrimination in Fire Detection Systems,’ Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 6:3 (1994), pp. 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pierce, M. and Cordasco, G. M., ‘Smarter Detectors,’ NFPA Journal, 91:6 (November/December 1997), pp. 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernstein, D. S., ‘The End of False Alarms,’ NFPA Journal, 92:1 (January/February 1998), pp. 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  13. UL 268, Smoke Detectors for Fire Protective Signaling Systems, Northbrook, Illinois: UL, 1989.

  14. NFPA 92B, Guide for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria, and Large Areas, Quincy, Mass: NFPA, 1996.

  15. Milke, J. A., and Mowrer, F. W., ‘A Design Algorithm for Smoke Management Systems in Atria and Covered Malls,’ Report FP 93–04, Report to American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, University of Maryland, May 1993.

  16. Shaner, D.L., ‘Discrimination Between Smoldering and Nuisance Sources Using Gas Signatures,’ M.S. Thesis, College Park, Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tewarson, A., ‘Generation of Heat and Chemical Compounds in Fires,’ SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd edition, Quincy, Mass: NFPA, 1995, pp. 3–53 to 3–124.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gottuk, D. T., and Roby, R. J. ‘Effect of Combustion Conditions on Species Production,’ SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd edition, Quincy, Mass.: NFPA, 1995, pp. 2–64 to 2–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Denny, Samuel, ‘Development of a Discriminating Fire Detector for Use in Residential Occupancies,’ Report FP 93–07, M.S. Thesis, College Park, Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milke, J. A., and McAvoy, T. J., ‘Analysis of Signature Patterns for Discriminating Fire Detection with Multiple Sensors,’ Fire Technology, 31:3 (1995), pp. 120–136

    Google Scholar 

  21. Okayama, Y., ‘Approach to Detection of Fires in Their Very Early Stage by Odor Sensors and Neural Net,’ Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium of Fire Safety Science, pp. 955–964, 1991.

  22. Pan, D., ‘Applications of Pattern Recognition Using Neural Networks,’ M.S. Thesis, College Park, Chemical Engineering, University of Maryland, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hagen, B. C., ‘Evaluation of Gaseous Signatures in Large-Scale Test,’ Report FP 94–05, M.S. Thesis, College Park, Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milke, J. A., ‘Discriminating Fire Detection with Multiple Sensors and Neural Networks,’ National Fire Protection Research Foundation, Fire Suppression and Detection Symposium, Orlando, FL, February 12, 1997.

  25. McAvoy, T. J., Milke, J., and Kunt, T. A., ‘Using Multivariate Statistical Methods to Detect Fires,’ Fire Technology, 32:1 (1996), pp. 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hopkins, Mark, ‘A Study of Gaseous Signatures in Large-Scale Tests with Multiple Source Scenarios,’ M.S. Thesis, College Park, Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dong, D. and McAvoy, T. J., ‘Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis —Based on Principal Curves and Neural Networks,’ Computers and Chemical Engineering, 20 (1996), pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kresta, J., MacGregor, J., and Marlin, T., ‘Multivariate Statistical Monitoring of Process Operating Performance,’ Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 69 (1991) pp. 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nomikos, P., and MacGregor, J., ‘Monitoring Batch Processes Using Multi-Way PCA,’ AIChE Journal, 1994.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milke, J.A. Monitoring Multiple Aspects of Fire Signatures for Discriminating Fire Detection. Fire Technology 35, 195–209 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015432409522

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015432409522

Navigation