Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid assessment of butterfly diversity in a montane landscape

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present the results of a rapid assessment of butterfly diversity in the 754 ha Beaver Meadows study area in Rocky Mountain National Park, Larimer County, Colorado. We measured butterfly species richness and relative abundance as part of a landscape-scale investigation of diversity patterns involving several groups of organisms. A stratified random sampling design was used to include replication in both rare and common vegetation types. We recorded 49 butterfly species from the twenty-four 0.1 ha plots that were sampled four times during June, July, and August 1996. Butterfly species richness, diversity, and uniqueness were highest in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michaux) groves and wet meadows, which occupy only a small proportion of the studied landscape. This result supports the suggestion that aspen areas represent ‘hotspots’ of biological diversity in this montane landscape. Patterns of butterfly species richness were positively correlated with total vascular plant species richness (r = 0.69; P < 0.001), and native plant species richness (r = 0.64; P < 0.001). However, exotic plant species richness (r = 0.70; P < 0.001) and the cover of exotic plant species (r = 0.70; P < 0.001) were the best predictors of butterfly species richness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker WL,Munroe JA andHessl AE (1997) The effects of elk on aspen in the winter range in Rocky Mountain National Park. Ecography 20: 155-165

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB andLauner AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation 80: 113-125

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz CW (1983) Rocky Mountain National Park: A History. Colorado University Associated Press, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Burd M (1994) Bateman' principle and plant reproduction: The role of pollinator limitation in fruit and seed set. The Botanical Review 60(1): 83-111

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter JL (1988) Trees and Shrubs of Colorado. Johnson Books, Boulder, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program (1997) Rare and Imperiled Animals, Plants and Natural Communities. Vol 3, No 1. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • DeByle NV (1985) Wildlife. In: DeByle NV andWinokur RP (eds) Aspen: Ecology and Management in the Western United States, pp 135-152. USDA Forest Service Technical Report RM-119, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Ehrlich PR andRaven PH (1964) Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution. 18: 586-608

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera: Sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology 22: 849-861

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris CD andBrown FM (eds) (1981) Butterflies of the Rocky Mountain States. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT (1995) Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Population and Community Biology Series 13. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez D (1997) Importance of historical factors on species richness and composition of butterfly assemblages (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) in a northern Iberian mountain range. Journal of Biogeography 24: 77-88

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann B andCussans GW (1996) The importance of seeds and sexual reproduction in the population biology of Cirsium arvense: A literature review. Weed Research 36: 493-503

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JR (1985) Distribution. In: DeByle NV andWinokur RP (eds) Aspen: Ecology and Management in the Western United States, pp 9-10. USDA Forest Service Technical Report RM-119, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Jones JR,DeByle NV andBowers DM (1985a) Insects and other invertebrates. In: DeByle NV andWinokur RP (eds) Aspen: Ecology and Management in the Western United States, pp 107-114. USDA Forest Service Technical Report RM-119, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Jones JR,Kaufmann MR andRichardson EA (1985b) Effects of water and temperature. In: DeByle NV andWinokur RP (eds) Aspen: Ecology and Management in theWestern United States, pp 71-76. USDA Forest Service Technical Report RM-119, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Jongman RHG,ter Braak CJF andvan Tongeren OFR (eds) (1987) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands Kim KC (1993) Biodiversity, conservation, and inventory: Why insects matter. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 191-214

  • Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications 2: 203-217

    Google Scholar 

  • La Roe ET (1995) Biodiversity: A new challenge. In: LaRoe ET,Farris GS,Puckett CE,Doran PD andMac MJ (eds) Our Living Resources: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance and Health of US Plants, Animals and Ecosystems, pp 6-7. United States Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Leps J andSpitzer K (1990) Ecological determinants of butterfly communities (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) in the Tam Dao Mountains, Vietnam. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 87: 182-194

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HW (1995) Non-native species: Overview. In: LaRoe ET,Farris GS,Puckett CE,Doran PD andMac MJ (eds) Our Living Resources: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance and Health of US Plants, Animals and Ecosystems, pp 427-428. United States Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA andReynolds JF (1988) Statistical Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Master LL (1991) Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5: 559-563

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina JM andPalma JM (1996) Butterfly diversity and rarity within selected habitats of western Andalusia, Spain (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). Nota Lepidopterologica 78: 267-280

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueggler WF (1985) Vegetation associations. In: DeByle NV andWinokur RP (eds) Aspen: Ecology and Management in the Western United States, pp 45-55. USDA Forest Service Technical Report RM-119, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Murphy DD andWilcox BA (1986) Butterfly diversity in natural habitat fragments: a test of the validity of vertebrate-based management. In: Verner J,Morrison JL andRalph CJ (eds) Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates, pp 287-292. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson SM andAndersen DC (1994) An assessment of riparian environmental quality by using butterflies and disturbance susceptibility scores. The Southwestern Naturalist 39: 137-142

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1991) Butterfly Conservation. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR,Pyle RM,Thomas JA,Thomas CD andHammond PC (1995) Butterfly conservation management. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 57-83

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R (1983) A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33: 700-706

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler PA,Bray RA andSimonson SE (1997) Butterflies of Rocky Mountain National Park. List prepared for the National Park Service. United States Department of Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler PA andKrizek GO (1984) Butterflies East of the Great Plains. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler PA (1999) A Field Guide to Western Butterflies. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (1996) Climate and species range. Nature 382: 765-766

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet RK (1981) Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45: 3-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E andYates TJ (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell JA (1994) Biogeography of Lepidoptera on the California Channel Islands. In: Halverson WL andMoender GJ (eds) The Fourth California Islands Symposium Update on the Status of Resources, pp 449-463. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell SD,Grant JF andLambdin PL (1995) Incidence of above-ground arthropod species on musk thistle in Tennessee. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 13: 17-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Riepe D andToborg B (1996) Butterflies and moths of national parks, state parks, and national wildlife refuges. A survey reflects a growing interest in managing for Lepidoptera. National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior. Park Science 16(4): 15-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1994) Insect Conservation Biology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoble MJ (1992) The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1968) Hilltopping as a mating mechanism to aid the survival of low density species. Journal of the Research on the Lepidoptera 7: 191-204

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1986) The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1992) Hostplant records for butterflies and skippers (mostly from Colorado) 1959-1991, with new life histories and notes on oviposition, immatures, and ecology. Papilio 6: 1-170

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson SE (1998) Rapid Assessment of Butterfly Diversity: A Method for Landscape Evaluation. Unpublished MS thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks TH,Greatorex-Davies JN,Mountford JO,Hall ML andMarrs RH (1996) The effects of shade on the plant communities of rides in plantation woodland and implications for butterfly conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 80: 197-207

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K,Jaros J,Havelka J andLeps J (1997) Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biological Conservation 80: 9-15

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1996) Systat 7.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ,Faulkner MB andSchell LD (1995) A modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 117: 113-121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ andBachand RR (1997) Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) ecotones in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA. Ecology 78: 632-641

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ,Chong GW,Kalkhan MA andSchell LD (1997) Multi-scale sampling of plant diversity: effects of minimum mapping unit size. Ecological Applications 7(3): 1064-1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ,Binkley D,Chong GW,Kalkhan MA,Schell LD,Bull KA,Otsuki Y,Newman G,Bashkin M andSon Y (1999) Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69(1): 25-46

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR,Lawton JH andSouthwood SR (1984) Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K (1997) Aspen Regeneration in Elk Winter Range of Rocky Mountain National Park and Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. Unpublished MS thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel AB (1996) Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biological Conservation 85(2): 73-85

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD andMalorie HC (1985) Rarity, species richness, and conservation: Butterflies of the atlas mountains in Morocco. Biological Conservation 33: 95-117

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchi GM,Kennedy PL,Urban D andHein D (1995) Bird species richness in relation to isolation of aspen habitats. Wilson Bulletin 107(3): 463-474

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG,O'Neill RV,Gardner RH andMilne BT (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3: 153-162

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen TT andLorenz DC (1991) The Colorado Front Range: a Century of Change. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1952) A study of summer foliage insect communities in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 22: 1-44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood PA andSamways MJ (1992) Landscape element pattern and continuity of butterfly flight paths in an ecologically landscaped botanic garden, Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 58: 149-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonson, S.E., Opler, P.A., Stohlgren, T.J. et al. Rapid assessment of butterfly diversity in a montane landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 1369–1386 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016663931882

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016663931882

Navigation