Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the effects of contrast change on pattern VEPs, and the transition between onset, reversal and offset modes of stimulation

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the relationship between the visual evoked potential (VEP) components by tracing the transition from onset/offset mode of stimulation to the reversal mode by a series of contrast change steps. VEPs on the ipsilateral and contralateral side of the scalp with respect to the left half-field checkerboard stimulus (checksizes: 12′, 50′ and 80′) were recorded in 15 subjects. Eight contrast steps for each checksize were recorded. Each test step consisted of the alternation of a constant high contrast checkerboard (A), with a second checkerboard (B) in which the contrast was changed. Checkerboard B was initially of identical spatial phase to A, but contrast was reduced systematically until B was a uniform grey field (i.e. onset/offset). In subsequent steps checkerboard B was of opposite spatial phase and contrast was increased until the final step when B was of equal high contrast (i.e. full reversal). All ipsilateral and contralateral onset components, ipsilateral offset components, and the reversal P100 component significantly enlarged with increasing contrast. The extent of amplitude change with contrast was greatest for offset, followed by onset and then reversal. A clear association could be discerned between all offset and reversal components. Onset CI and CII appeared to be related to the reversal P100 and N145, respectively. When small 12′ checks were used, onset Co appeared to have common features with the reversal N80. The contralateral onset P105 component did not have a comparable component in the reversal mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spekreijse H, Estévez O. The pattern appearance-disappearance response. Trace 1972; 6: 13–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spekreijse H, Van der Tweel LH, Zuidema Th. Contrast evoked responses in man. Vis Res 1973; 13: 1577–601.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jeffreys DA. The physiological significance of pattern visual evoked potentials. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977: 134–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Tweel LH, Regan D, Spekreijse H. Some aspects of potentials evoked by changes in spatial brightness contrast. 7th ISCERG Symposium Istanbul, 1969; 1–11.

  5. Estévez O, Spekreijse H. Relationship between pattern appearance-disappearance and pattern reversal responses. Exp Brain Res 1974; 19: 233–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halliday AM, Barrett G, Blumhardt LD, Kriss A. The macular and paramacular subcomponents of the pattern evoked response. In: Lehmann D, Callaway E, eds. Human Visual Evoked Potentials: Applications and Problems. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shawkat FS, Kriss A. Interocular interaction assessed by VEPs to pattern-onset,-reversal and-offset in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kulikowski JJ. Visual evoked potentials as a measure of visibility. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977: 168–83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drasdo N. Cortical potentials evoked by pattern presentation in the foveal region. In: Barber C, ed. Evoked Potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press Ltd, 1980: 167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shawkat FS, Kriss A. Sequential pattern-onset,-reversal and-offset VEPs: Comparison of effects of checksize. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shawkat FS, Kriss A. Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset,-reversal, and-offset VEPs. Doc Ophthalmol 1998; 94: 307–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spekreijse H, Dagnelie G, Maier J, Regan D. Flicker and movement constituents of the pattern reversal response. Vis Res 1985; 25: 1297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kulikowski JI. Pattern and movement detection in man and rabbit: Separation and comparison of occipital potentials. Vis Res 1978; 18: 183–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Tweel H, Spekreijse H. Signification of the stimulus in human pattern evoked potentials. Trace 1968; 6: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kurita-Tashima S, Tobimatsu S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M, Kato M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 161–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bodis-Wollner I, Brannan JR, Nicoll J, Svetlana F, Mylin LH. A short latency cortical component of the foveal VEP is revealed by hemifield stimulation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 201–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shawkat F, Barrett G, Lawson J, Potts M, Lightman S. The role of macular-and paramacular-derived visual evoked potentials in the detection of dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Clin Vis Sci 1993; 8: 235–44.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kriss A, Halliday AM. A comparison of occipital potentials evoked by pattern onset, offset and reversal by movement. In: Barber C, ed. Evoked Potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press Ltd, 1980: 205–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barber C. Convergent features in visual evoked potentials to pattern onset, offset and reversal. In: Nodar RH, Barber C, eds Evoked Potentials II. Butterworths, London, 1984: 244–50.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Musselwhite MJ, Jeffreys DA. The influence of spatial frequency on the reaction times and evoked potentials recorded to grating pattern stimuli. Vis Res 1985; 25: 1545–55.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jakobsson P, Johansson B. The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on the latency of the VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 79: 187–94.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jeffreys DA, Axford JG. Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin. Exp Brain Res 1972a; 6: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffreys DA, Axford JG. Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin. Exp Brain Res 1972b; 6: 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shawkat FS, Kriss A, Timms C, Taylor DSI. Comparison of pattern-onset,-reversal and-offset VEPs in treated amblyopia. Eye 1998; 12: 863–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shawkat, F.S., Kriss, A. A study of the effects of contrast change on pattern VEPs, and the transition between onset, reversal and offset modes of stimulation. Doc Ophthalmol 101, 73–89 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002750719094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002750719094

Navigation