Skip to main content
Log in

Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The deep/surface metaphor attacked by Webb (1997) is defended here interms of its validity as a description of important differences in the waysin which students learn, and also on the basis of the encouragement it hasbrought to academic staff to teach in more effective and imaginative ways.Post-modern theories which endorse extreme relativism are not seen as helpfulto the main concerns of either academic staff or educational developers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biggs, J.B. (1993). 'What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification', British Journal of Educational Psychology 63: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J. (1995) 'Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations', Educational Psychologist 30: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J. (1997) 'Contrasting perspectives on learning', in F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell and N.J. Entwistle (eds.), The Experience of Learning (2nd edn.). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press}.

  • Entwistle, N.J. (in press). 'Improving teaching through research on student learning', in J.J.F. Forest (ed.), University Teaching: International Perspectives. New York: Garland.

  • Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the Quality of Student Learning. Bristol: Technical & Educational Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, P.J. and Meyer, J.H.F. (1996). 'Individual diversity in effective studying', Higher Education 31(1) (whole issue).

  • Laurillard, D.M. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching: a Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: Routledge.

  • Marton, F. (1981). 'Phenomenography: describing conceptions of the world around us', Instructional Science 10: 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D.J. and Entwistle, N.J. (1984), (eds.), The Experience of Learning (2nd edn., 1997), Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976). 'On qualitative differences in learning. I-Outcome and process', British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlett, M.R. and Hamilton, D. (1977). 'Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programmes', in D. Hamilton et al. (eds.) Beyond the Numbers Game. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: a Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. and Taylor, P. (1994). 'A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching', Learning and Instruction 4: 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (1995). 'Increasing faculty understanding of teaching', in W.A. Wright (ed.) Successful Faculty Development Strategies. New York: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, G. (1997). 'Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography', Higher Education 33: 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Entwistle, N. Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb. Higher Education 33, 213–218 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002930608372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002930608372

Keywords

Navigation