Abstract
Education students' learning experiences were investigated in an experiment where writing was used as a central tool for learning. Experimental group students (n = 15) studied three textbooks, carried out writing assignments requiring knowledge transforming, discussed their assignments in groups and wrote a long essay. Control group students (n = 13) read the same books on their own without engaging in activating learning tasks, attended lectures and took an exam. After the course the students were interviewed and asked what they felt they had learned during the course. They were also asked to fill in a learning assessment form. The interviews and the questionnaire assessments produced similar results. The experimental group students described their learning in a greater variety of ways than did the students in the control group. They emphasised the development of their thinking, changes in their conceptions of the topics studied and their acquisition of communication and study skills more than the control group students. The findings of the present study support earlier studies of writing-to-learn, suggesting that activating textbook reading by means of writing tasks and group discussions may enhance learning of the kind that higher education is aiming at: understanding, conceptional change and the development of critical thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, J.M. (1993). ‘The promise of writing to learn’, Written Communication 10, 334– 370.
Anderson, J.R. (1982). ‘Acquisition of cognitive skill’, Psychology Review 89, 369–406.
Anderson, J.R. (1987). ‘Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions’, Psychological Review 94, 192–210.
Applebee, A.N. (1984). ‘Writing and reasoning’, Review of Educational Research 54, 577– 596.
Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature of Expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Biggs, J. (1988). ‘Approaches to learning and to essay writing’, in Schmeck, R.R (ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 185–228.
Biggs, J. (1993). ‘From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach’, Higher Education Research and Development 12, 73–85.
Biggs, J. (1996). ‘Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment’, Higher Education 32, 347–364.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989). ‘Situated cognition and the culture of learning’, Educational Researcher 18, 32–42.
Commander, N. and Smith, B.D. (1996). ‘Learning logs: A tool for cognitive monitoring’, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 39, 446–453.
Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J. and Jonassen, D.H. (eds.) (1993). Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. NATO ASI Series. Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, vol. 105. Berlin: Springer.
Dysthe, O. (1996). ‘The multivoiced classroom. Interactions of writing and classroom discourse’, Written Communication 13, 385–425.
Eigler, G., Jechle, T., Merziger, G. and Winter, A. (1991). ‘Writing and knowledge: Effects and re-effects’, European Journal of Psychology of Education 6, 225–232.
Entwistle, A. and Entwistle, N. (1992). ‘Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations’, Learning and Instruction 2, 1–22.
Entwistle, N. (1995). ‘Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations’, Educational Psychologist 30 (1), 47–54.
Entwistle, N.J. and Entwistle, A. (1991). ‘Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications’, Higher Education 22, 205– 227.
Entwistle, N., Entwistle, A. and Tait, H. (1993). ‘Academic understanding and contexts to enhance it: A perspective from research on student learning’, in Duffy, T.M, Lowyck, J. and Jonassen, D.H. (eds.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Berlin: Springer, pp. 331–357.
Eteläpelto, A. and Light, P. (1998). ‘Contextual knowledge in the development of design expertise’, in Bliss, J., Light, P. and Säljö, R. (eds.), Learning Sites: Social and Technological Contexts for Learning (in press).
Flower, L., Wallace, D.L., Norris, L. and Burnett, R.E. (eds.) (1994). Making Thinking Visible. Writing, Collaborative Planning, and Classroom Inquiry. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English.
Geisler, C. (1994). Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gordon, R. (1994). ‘Keeping students at the center: Portfolio assessment at the college level’, Journal of Experiential Education 17, 23–27.
Hendry, G.D. (1996). ‘Constructivism and educational practice’, Australian Journal of Education 40, 19–45.
Jonassen, D., Mayes, T. and McAleese, R. (1993). ‘A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education’, in Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J. and Jonassen, D.H. (eds.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Berlin: Springer, pp. 231–247.
Langer, J.A. (1986). ‘Learning through writing: Study skills in the content areas’, Journal of Reading 29, 400–406.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leinhardt, G., McCarthy Young, K. and Merriman, J. (1995). ‘Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory’, Learning and Instruction 5, 401–408.
Lonka, K. and Ahola, K. (1995). ‘Activating instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education’, European Journal of Psychology of Education 10, 351–368.
Marton, F. (1988). ‘Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality’, in Fetterman, D.M. (ed.), Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education. The Silent Scientific Revolution. New York: Praeger, pp. 176–205.
Marton, F. (1994). ‘Phenomenography’, in Husén, T. and Postlethwaite, T.N. (eds.), The International Encyclopaedia of Education (2nd ed., vol 8). Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 4424–4429.
McClynaer, J.F. and Knoles, L.Z. (1992). ‘Ersatz learning, inauthentic testing’, Journal of Excellence in College Teaching 3, 33–50.
McCrindle, A.R. and Christensen, C.A. (1995). ‘The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance’, Learning and Instruction 5, 167–185.
Morrison, K. (1996). ‘Developing reflective practice in higher degree students through a learning journal’, Studies in Higher Education 21(3), 1996.
Newell, G.E. and Winograd, P. (1989). ‘The effects of writing on learning from expository text’, Written Communication 6(2), 196–217.
November, P. (1996). ‘Journals for the journey into deep learning: A framework’, Higher Education Research and Development 15, 115–127.
Penrose, A.M. (1992). ‘To write or not to write. Effects of task and task interpretation on learning through writing’, Written Communication 9, 465–500.
Perry, W.G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Quinn, K.B. (1995). ‘Teaching reading and writing as modes of learning in college: A glance at the past; a view to the future’, Reading Research and Instruction 34, 295–314.
Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. (1991). ‘Literate expertise’, in Anderson, K.A. and Smith, J. (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise. Prospects and Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 172–194.
Schumacher, G. and Gradwohl Nash, J. (1991). ‘Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to writing’, Research in the Teaching of English 25(1), 67–96.
Smagorinsky, P. (1995). ‘Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualizing writing accross the curriculum as composing accross the curriculum’, American Journal of Education 103, 160–184.
Spivey, N.N. (1990). ‘Transforming texts. Constructive processes in reading and writing’, Written Communication 7(2), 256–287.
Stotsky, S. (1995). ‘The uses and limitations of personal or personalized writing in writing theory, research, and instruction’, Reading Research Quarterly 30, 758–776.
Tierney, R.J., O'Flahavan, J.F. and McGinley, W. (1989). ‘The effects of reading and writing upon thinking critically’, Reading Research Quarterly 24, 134–173.
Tynjälä, P. (1997a). ‘Developing education students conceptions of the learning process in different learning environments’, Learning and Instruction 7, 277–292.
Tynjälä, P. (1997b). ‘How do conceptions of learning change?’, A manuscript submitted in the Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Tynjälä, P., Nuutinen, A., Eteläpelto, A., Kirjonen, J. and Remes, P. (1997). ‘The acquisition of professional expertise – A challenge for educational research’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 41, 475–494.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). ‘Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change’, Learning and Instruction 4, 45–69.
Vosniadou, S. (1996). ‘Learning environments for representational growth and cognitive flexibility’, in Vosniadou, S., de Corte, E., Glaser, R. and Mandl, H. (eds.), International Perspectives on the Design of Technology Supported Learning Environments. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum, pp. 13–23.
Young, A. and Fulwiler, T. (eds.) (1986). Writing Across the Disciplines. Research into Practice. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tynjälä, P. Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students' learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education 36, 209–230 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003260402036
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003260402036