Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrology and Chemistry of the Choptank River Basin

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Choptank River basin is a coastal plain catchment dominated by agriculture (52% of land use). We summarize an 11 year data set of discharge and chemistry from a gauged subbasin. Discharge exhibited seasonal variations driven by seasonal evapotranspiration. There were double seasonal maxima of pH, NH4 +, NO3 -, total N, Fe, and total P concentrations in late spring and fall as the saturated zone rose and fell within the soil. Significant interannual variability in discharge was the result of rainfall variation. There were positive nterannual trends in NO3 - concentrations and negative interannual trends in NH4 + and PO4 3- concentrations. These data were combined to estimate N and P export coefficients of 3-11 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and 0.14-0.66 kg P ha-1 yr-1, driven primarily by interannual variations in discharge. These export coefficients are low compared to other coastal plain watersheds dominated by agriculture and may be responsible for the small anthropogenic effects in the Choptank estuary compared to other Chesapeake drainages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachman, L.J. and Wilson, J.M.: 1984, Hydrogeology and Selected Water-well Records. Chemical Analyses, Water Level Measurements, Lithologie Logs, and Geophysical Logs, Report of Investigations No. 40, Maryland Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulac, M.N. and Reckhow, K.H.: 1982, Water Resourc. Bull. 18, 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W.R., Garber, J.H., Summers, R. and Kemp, W.M.: 1995, Estuaries 18, 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D.H.: 1983, Characteristics of Streamflow in Maryland, Report of Investigations No. 35, Maryland Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D.C. and Oppenheimer, M.: 1991, Ambio 30, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T.R.: 1987, Nutrient Inputs to the Choptank River: Monthly and Interannual Variations in Water Discharge, and N, P, and Fe Concentrations at the USGS Gauging Station in Greensboro, MD for Water Years 1980–1986, Report 3A to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under cooperation agreement 14–16–005–86–9035 with the University of Maryland, Center for Estuarine and Environmental Studies.

  • Fisher, T.R., Harding Jr., L.W., Stanley, D.W. and Ward, L.G.: 1988, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 27, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T.R., Peele, E.R., Ammerman, J.W. and Harding Jr., L.W.: 1992, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 82, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, P.A., Denver, J.M., Phillips, P.J. and Shedlock, R.J.: 1993, Water-quality Assessment of the Delmarva Peninsula, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia-Effects of Agricultural Activities on, and Distribution of Nitrate and other Inorganic Constituents in the Surficial Aquifer, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93–40, Towson, Maryland.

  • Harding Jr., L.W.: 1994, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 104, 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding Jr., L.W., Meeson, B.W. and Fisher, T.R.: 1986, Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 23, 773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, M.: 1998, The Impact of Forest on Stream Water Quality Draining two Agricultural Watersheds on the Delmarva Peninsula, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.

  • Meade, R.H.: 1972, Transport and Deposition of Sediments in Estuaries, Geological Society of America Memoir 133.

  • Nixon, S.W. and Pilson, M.E.Q.: 1983, ‘Nitrogen in Estuarine and Coastal Marine Ecosystems’, in E.J. Carpenter and D.G. Capone (eds.), Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, Academic Press, New York, pp. 565–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, V. and Olem, H.: 1994, Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R.J. and Moore, K.A.: 1983, Science 222, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peierls, B.L., Caraco, N.F., Pace, M.L. and Cole, J.J.: 1991, Nature 350, 386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C.J.: 1985, Science 228, 1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubel, J.R. and Hirschberg, D.J.: 1978, ‘Estuarine Graveyards, Climatic Change, and the Importance of the Estuarine Environment’, in M.L. Wiley (ed.), Estuarine Interactions, Academic Press, New York, pp. 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stookey, L.L.: 1970, Anal. Chem. 42, 779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J.D.H. and Parsons, T.R.: 1972, A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis, Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valderrama, J.C.: 1981, Mar. Chem. 10, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M.: 1977, Ecol. Monogr. 47, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitledge, T.E., Malloy, C., Patton, C.J. and Wirick, C.D.: 1981, Automated Nutrient Analyses in Seawater, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report No. 51398.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, T., Lee, KY., Berndt, H. et al. Hydrology and Chemistry of the Choptank River Basin. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 105, 387–397 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005001525063

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005001525063

Navigation