Skip to main content
Log in

Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abusch, D.: 1994, ‘The Scope of Indefinites’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 88–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, I. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Ouantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, F.: ‘A Minimalist Approach to Quantifier Scope’, in Proceedings of NELS23.

  • Ben-Shalom, D.: ‘Object Wide Scope and Semantic Trees’, in Proceedings of SALT 3.

  • Bennett, M. R.: 1974, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • van Benthem, J.: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J.: 1991, Language in Action, North-Holland.

  • Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, UMASS.

  • Carpenter, B.: 1997a, ‘Distribution, Collection and Quantification: A Type-Logical Account of Plurality’, to appear in B. Carpenter, Type Logical Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, B.: 1997b, ‘Quantification and Scoping: A Deductive Account’, in B. Carpenter, Type Logical Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1993, ‘Questions with Quantifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1975, Montague's Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, UMASS.

  • van der Does, J.: 1992, Applied Quantifier Logics, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • van der Does, J.: 1993, ‘Sums and Quantifiers’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 509–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1986, ‘A Note on Collective Predicates, Distributive Predicates and All’, in Marshall, Miller and Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egli, U. and K. von Heusionger: 1995, ‘The Epsilon Operator and e-Type Pronouns’, in U. Egli, P.E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow and G. Wienold (eds), Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language, John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D. F.: 1981, ‘Quantifier Scope and Syntactic Islands’, in Proceedings of CLS 17.

  • Farkas, D. F.: 1997, ‘Evaluation Indices and Scope’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1985, Reasoning with Arburary Objects, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. and I. Sag: 1982, ‘Referential and Quantificational Indefinities’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: 1995, ‘Economy and Scope’, Natural Language Semantics 3.

  • Heim, I., H. Lasnik and R. May 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, H.: 1993, Studied Flexibility, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Hepple, M.: 1991, The Grammar and Processing of Order and Dependency: A Categorial Approach, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1987, ‘Indefiniteness and Predication’, in E. J. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Menulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press.

  • Hilbert, D. and P. Bernays: 1939, Die Grundlagen der Mathematik II, second edition, reprint 1970, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P.: 1992, ‘Bach-Peters Sentences in a Variable-Free Semantics’, in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium.

  • Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E.: 1987, ‘A Semantic Definition of “Indefinite NP”’, in E. J. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press.

  • Keenan, E., and L. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1995, ‘Scope or pseudoscope? Are There Wide Scope Indefinites’, an unpublished ms., UMASS. To appear in F. Hamm and A. von Stechow (eds.), Proceedings of Recent Developments in the Theory of Natural Language, Universität Tübingen.

  • Lakoff, G.: 1970, ‘Repartee’, Foundations of Language 6, 389–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F.: 1989, ‘Groups I & II’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–605, 723–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Baucrle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers, D. Reidel.

  • Ludlow, P. and S. Neale: 1991, ‘Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 171–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Meyer Viol, W. P. M.: 1995, Instantial Logic, Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University, ILLC dissertation series, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: 1988, Categorial Investigations, Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, S.: 1991, ‘N-ary Quantifiers and the Expressive Power of NP Compositions’, in J. van der Does and J. van Eijck (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers Theory and Application, Dutch network for language, logic and information.

  • Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theories and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: ‘Variables Explained Away’, in Selected Logic Papers, Random House, New York.

  • Reinhart, T.: 1992, ‘Wh-in-situ: An Apparent Paradox’, in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium.

  • Reinhart, T.: 1997, ‘Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided between QR and Choice Functions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 40(4), 335–397 (this issue). Prepublished in T. Reinhart, Interface Strategies, OTS Working Papers 95–002, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, R.: 1976, ‘Scope Phenomena, “Movement Transformations” and Relative Clauses’, in B. H. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M. and B. Partee: 1982, ‘Conjunction, Type Ambiguity and Wide Scope or’, in Flickinger et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford.

  • Ross, J. R.: 1967, Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Ruys, E. G.: 1992, The Scope of Indefinites, Ph.D., dissertation, Utrecht University.

  • Ruys, E. G.: 1995, ‘Weak Crossover as a Scope Phenomenon’, unpublished ms., Utrecht University.

  • Scha, R.: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof and T. M. V. Janssen (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Amsterdam.

  • Schein, B.: 1993, Plurals and Events, MIT Press.

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1987, ‘Bound Variables in Syntax: Are There Any?’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium.

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1997, ‘Strategies for Scope Taking’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1993, A Theory of Aspectuality, Cambridge University Press.

  • Winter, Y.: 1995a, ‘Syncategorematic Conjunction and Structured Meanings’, in Proceedings of SALT 5.

  • Winter, Y.: 1995b, ‘On the Formalization of Choice Functions as Representing the Scope of Indefinites’, in G. V. Morrill and R. T. Oelule (eds.), Formal Grammar, Proceedings of the Conference of the European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, Barcelona.

  • Winter, Y.: 1996a, ‘A Unified Semantic Treatment of Singular NP Coordination’, Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 337–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y.: 1996b, ‘The Square of Individuals’, in P. Dekker and J. Groenendijk (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium.

  • Zimmermann, T. E.: 1986, ‘Transparent Adverbs and Scopeless Quantifiers’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics, Foris.

  • Zimmermann, T. E.: 1991, ‘Scopeless Quantifiers and Operators’, in J. van der Does and J. van Eijck (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers Theory and Application, Dutch network for language, logic and information.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winter, Y. Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399–467 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005354323136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005354323136

Keywords

Navigation