Abstract
This paper expands themigration-fertility linkage literature by examiningthe fertility impact of temporary migration inHubei, China. The central hypothesis is thattemporary migration affects migrants' fertilitythrough a detachment process: The separation oftemporary migrants' actual residence from their de jure residence creates a loophole in family planningadministration, weakening the social control overtheir fertility. The analysis of annualorder-specific births since 1979 suggests thattemporary migrants exhibit significantly higherprobabilities of having a second birth thanpermanent migrants and non-migrants once type ofresidence is controlled for; rural-rural temporarymigrants have the highest fertility among all groupsexamined. The results lend support to the detachmenthypothesis while indicating a strong anti-natalimpact of urban residence. Rural-urban temporarymigrants are not the ones to blame for increases inout-planning births in contemporary China, but theirfertility would have been lower if there had been nodetachment. Rural-rural temporary migrants areactually the escapees of the one-child-per-familypolicy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, P. D., 1984. Event History Analysis. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hill, CA.
Bacal, R. A., 1988. 'Migration and fertility in the Philippines: Hendershot's selectivity model revisited', Philippine Population Journal 4: 53–67.
Banister, J., 1987. China's Changing Population. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Brockerhoff, M. and Yang, X., 1994. ‘The impact of migration on fertility in sub-Saharan Africa’, Social Biology 41: 19–43.
Campbell, E. K., 1989. ‘A note on the fertility-migration interrelationship: the case of men in western area, Sierra Leone’, Demography India 18: 103–114.
Cooney, R. S. and Li, J., 1994. ‘Household registration type and compliance with the 'one child' policy in China, 1979-1988’, Demography 31: 21–32.
Findley, S. E., 1982. ‘Fertility and migration’, in J. A. Ross (ed), International Encyclopedia of Population. The Free Press, New York, 247–252.
Goldstein, A. and Goldstein, S., 1996. 'Migration motivations and outcomes: permanent and temporary migrants compared', in A. Goldstein and Wang Feng (eds), China: The Many Facets of Demographic Change. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 187–212.
Goldstein, A., Goldstein, S. and Gu, S., 1991. ‘Rural industrialization and migration in the People's Republic of China’, Social Science History 15: 289–314.
Goldstein, A., Goldstein, S. and Gu, S., 1993. ‘Determinants of permanent and temporary migration in Hubei province, PRC’, IUSSP Proceedings.
Goldstein, A., Goldstein, S. and Guo, S., 1991. ‘Temporary migrants in Shanghai households, 1984’, Demography 28: 275–292.
Goldstein, A., White, M. J. and Goldstein, S., 1997. ‘Migration and fertility in Hubei province, China’, Demography 34: 481–492.
Goldstein, S., 1978. ‘Migration and fertility in Thailand, 1960-1970’, Canadian Studies in Population 5: 167–180.
Goldstein, S. and Goldstein, A., 1983. ‘Migration and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia: an analysis using life history data’, Rand Corporation Report No. N-1860-AID, Rand Co., Santa Monica, CA.
Goldstein, S. and Goldstein, A., 1991. Permanent and Temporary Migration Differentials in China. East-West Center, Honolulu.
Greenhalgh, S., 1986. ‘Shifts in China's population policy, 1984-86: views from the central, provincial, and local levels’, Population and Development Review 12: 491–515.
Greenhalgh, S., 1993. ‘The peasantization of the one-child policy in Shaanxi’, in D. Davis and S. Harrell (eds), Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 219–250.
Greenhalgh, S., Zhu, C. and Li, N., 1993. ‘Restraining population growth in three Chinese villages: 1988-93’, The Population Council Working Paper, No. 557, Population Council, New York.
Guest, M., 1989. Labor Allocation and Rural Development. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Hendershot, G. E., 1976. ‘Social class, migration, and fertility in the Philippines’, in The Dynamics of Migration: Internal Migration and Fertility. The Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 197–258.
Hervitz, H. M., 1985. ‘Selectivity, adaptation, or disruption? A comparison of alternative hypotheses on the effects of migration on fertility: the case of Brazil’, International Migration Review 19: 293–317.
Hugo, G. J., Hull, T. H., Hull, V. J. and Jones, G. W., 1987. The Demographic Dimension in Indonesian Development. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lee, B. S. and Farber, S., 1984. ‘Fertility adaptation by rural-urban migrants in developing countries: a case of Korea’, Population Studies 38: 141–156.
Liu, G. and Goldstein, S., 1996. ‘Migrant-nonmigrant fertility differentials in Anhui, China’, Chinese Environment and Development 7: 144–169.
Millman, S. R. and Potter, R. G., 1984. ‘The fertility impact of spousal separation’, Studies in Family Planning 15: 121–126.
Nelson, J. M., 1976. ‘Sojourners versus new urbanites: causes and consequences of temporary versus permanent cityward migration in developing countries’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 24: 721–757.
Perez, A., 1991. ‘The fertility impacts of migration in the Philippines’, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Speare, A., Jr. and Harris, J., 1986. ‘Education, earnings, and migration in Indonesia’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 34: 223–244.
Stephen, E. H. and Bean, F. D., 1992. ‘Assimilation, disruption and the fertility of Mexican-origin women in the United States’, International Migration Review 26: 67–88.
Wang, F., 1996. ‘A decade of the one-child policy: achievements and implications’, in A. Goldstein and Wang Feng (eds), China: The Many Facets of Demographic Change. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 97–120.
White, M. J., Moreno, L. and Guo, S., 1995. ‘The interrelation of fertility and geographic mobility in Peru: a hazards model analysis’, International Migration Review 29(2): 492–514.
Whyte, M. K. and Gu, S., 1987. ‘Popular response to China's fertility transition’, Population and Development Review 13: 471–493.
Wilson, J. L., 1990. ‘Labor policy in China: reform and retrogression’, Problems of Communism Sept-Oct 90: 44–65.
Yadava, K. N. S. and Yadava, G. S., 1990. ‘Socioeconomic factors and effect on fertility of husbandwife separation due to migration’, Biology and Society 7: 139–144.
Yang, X., 1993. ‘Household registration, economic reform and migration’, International Migration Review 27: 796–818.
Yang, X., 1994. ‘Urban temporary out-migration under economic reforms: who moves and for what reasons?’ Population Research and Policy Review 13: 83–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X. The Fertility Impact of Temporary Migration in China: A Detachment Hypothesis. European Journal of Population 16, 163–183 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006351407811
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006351407811