Skip to main content
Log in

Acceptable practices in Ontario's forests: Differences between the public and forestry professionals

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compare and contrast survey responses to statements about 1) environmental values, 2) agreement with forest management goals and approaches, 3) perceptions of risk, 4) trust in science and government, and 5) acceptability of forestry practices between the public and three groups of forestry professionals (government biologists, government foresters, and industry foresters) in Ontario. The survey emphasized issues surrounding forest vegetation management due to the contentious nature of herbicide use. Responses were gathered from a 140-question telephone survey administered from September and November 1994 to 1,500 members of the general public and 201 forestry professionals across the province. Forestry professionals tended to be less supportive of some environmental values and forest management goals, perceive everyday and forestry activities to be less risky, be more trusting of science and government, and be more accepting of forestry activities than the general public. Among the three groups of forestry professionals, industry foresters tended to be most different from the public, followed by government foresters, and government biologists. These differences reveal potential sources of conflict and miscommunication between the public and forest managers. Recognizing these differences can help improve communications with the public about forest management plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barke, R., Jenkins-Smith, H. and Slovic, P. 1997. Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Sci. Quart. 78(1): 167-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckley, T.M. and Korber. D. 1995. Sociology’s potential to improve forest management and inform forest policy. For. Chron. 71: 712-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M. W. 1993. “Socially acceptable” forestry: what does it imply for ecosystem management? West. J. Appl. For. 8(4): 116-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, L. J., Wagner, R. G. and Perrin, B. 1995. Public attitudes towards forest herbicide use and the implications for public involvement. For. Chron. 71: 596-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decision Research 1995. Vegetation Management in Ontario’s Forests: Attitudes and Perceptions of the Public and Forestry Professionals. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. VMAP Technical Report 95-02. 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. 1992. Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965-1990.pp. 89-116. In: Dunlap, R. and Metig, A. (Eds) American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement 1970-1990. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., Burns, W., Mertz, C. K. and Slovic, P. 1992. Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: analysis of a structural model. Risk Anal. 12: 417-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K. 1993a. Decidedly different: expert and public views of risks from a radioactive waste repository. Risk Anal. 13: 643-648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K. 1993b. The Nevada Initiative: A risk communication fiasco. Risk Anal. 13: 497-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K. 1994. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal. 14: 1101-1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Brown, T. and Kuetsch, J. 1996. Valuing risks to the environment. In: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Special Issue: Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management) 545: 54-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R., Golding, D. and Tuler, S. 1992. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks (Individual and collective responses to risk). J. Soc. Issues 48(4): 161-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, N., Malmfors, T. and Slovic, P. 1992. Intuitive toxicology: expert and lay judgements of chemical risks. Risk Anal. 12: 215-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krewski, D., Slovic, P., Bartlett, S., Flynn, J. and Mertz, C. K. 1995. Health risk perception in Canada I: Rating hazards, sources of information and responsibility for health protection.Human and Ecological Risk Assess. 1(3): 231-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limoges, C., Cambrosio, A. and Davignon, L. 1995. Plurality of worlds, plurality of risks. Risk Anal. 15: 699-707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luloff, A. E. 1995. Regaining vitality in the forestry profession: A sociologist’s perspective. J. For. 93(11): 6-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcin, T. C. 1995. Integrating the social sciences into forest ecosystem management research. J. For. 93(11): 29-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, R. 1993. An increasing public concern. pp. 426-430. In: Pimentel, D. and Lehman, N. (Eds) The pesticide question: environment, economics, and ethics. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Wash., D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, E., Mendelson, R. and Whitelaw, E. 1991. New conflicts stir managers of U.S. Forests. pp. 5-12. In: Forum for Appl. Res. and Public Policy (Fall issue).

  • O’Riordan, T. 1995. Framework for choice: Core beliefs and the environment. Environ. (October): 4-9, 25-29.

  • Sachs, C. 1993. Growing public concern over pesticides in food and water. pp. 380-389. In: Pimentel, D. and Lehman, N. (Eds) The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salwasser, H. 1994. Ecosystem management: can it sustain diversity and productivity? J. For. 92(8): 6-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterfield, T. and Gregory, R. 1998. Reconciling environmental values and pragmatic choices. Soc. & Nat. Resour. (in press)

  • Shands, W. E. 1991. Reaching consensus on national forest use. pp. 18-23. In: Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy (Fall issue).

  • Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Sci. 236: 280-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Malmfors, T., Krewski, D., Mertz, C. K., Neil, N. and Bartlett, S. 1995. Intuitive toxicology. II. expert and lay judgements of chemical risks in Canada. Risk Anal. 15: 661-675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. G. 1994. Toward integrated forest vegetation management. J. For. 92(11): 26-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V. R. 1995. Direct inference, probability, and a conceptual gulf in risk communication.Risk Anal. 15: 603-609.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, R.G., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. et al. Acceptable practices in Ontario's forests: Differences between the public and forestry professionals. New Forests 16, 139–154 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006577019706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006577019706

Navigation