Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economics, Biology, and Naturalism: Three Problems Concerning the Question of Individuality

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines the ramifications of naturalism with regard to the question of individuality in economics and biology. Economic theory has to deal with whether households, firms, and states are individuals or are mere entities such as clubs, networks, and coalitions. Biological theory has to deal with the same question with regard to cells, organisms, family packs, and colonies. To wit, the question of individuality in both disciplines involves three separate problems: the metaphysical, phenomenist, and ontological. The metaphysical problem is concerned with purposeful action: Is the firm or organism exclusively the product of efficient causality (optimization) or is it motivated by final causality (purposefulness)? The phenomenist problem is interested in the substantiality of essences: Is the firm's or organism's scheme of institutions/traits deep or is it extraneous to identity? The ontological problem is related to the issue of reductionism: Is the behavior of lower-level organization governed by a pre-constituted entities or is it context-sensitive? The paper finds that theoretical differences run along the naturalist/anti-naturalist divide rather than along disciplinary specialization. Also, the paper finds that it is not inconsistent for the same theorist to be naturalist with regard to one problem and anti-naturalist with respect to the other two problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, R.I.: 1952, The Theory of Universals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, Toby P.: 1987, The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1967, The Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, ed. by Harold P. Cooke, Hugh Tredennick, in 23 volumes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, William Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, Francisco J.: 1987, 'Biological Reductionism: The Problems and Some Answers', in F. Eugene Yates (ed.), Alan Garfinkel, Donald O. Walter, and Gregory B. Yates (associate eds.) Self-Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 315–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard J.: 1983, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy: 1979, The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophic Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, Harvester, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark: 1980, The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, Robert N.: 1981, 'Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 12, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, Robert N.: 1990, Adaptation and the Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, Robert N. and Richard M. Burian (eds.): 1984, Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James and Gordon Tullock: 1962 The Calculus of Consent, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, John, Julie Overbaugh, and Stephan Miller: 1988, 'The Origin of Mutants', Nature 335(6186), 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, Bruce J.: 1991, 'Clarifying Popper', Journal of Economic Literature 29(1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T.: 1960, 'Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes', Psychological Review 67(6), 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Young Back: 1993, Paradigms and Conventions: Uncertainty, Decision Making, and Entrepreneurship, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

  • Danto, Arthur C.: 1967, 'Naturalism', in Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 5, Macmillan, New York, pp. 448–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard: 1967, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbruck, Max: 1976, 'How Aristotle Discovered DNA', in K. Huang (ed.), Physics and Our World, American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John, Ernest Nagel, and Sidney Hook: 1945, 'Are Naturalists Materialists?' Journal of Philosophy 42, 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary: 1982, 'Cultural Bias', in M. Douglas (ed.), In the Active Voice, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, John (ed.).: 1987, The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, émile: 1933, The Division of Labor in Society, trans. George Simpson, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, Niles: 1989, 'Punctuated Equilibria, Rates of Change and Large-Scale Entities in Evolutionary Systems', Journal of Social and Biological Structures 12(2/3), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, Niles and Stephen Jay Gould: 1972, 'Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism', in T.J.M. Schopf and J.M. Thomas (eds.), Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, Niles and Stanley N. Salthe: 1984, 'Hierarchy and Evolution', Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 1, 184–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon: 1983, Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth, Montgomery: 1988, Substance, Form and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, Michael T.: 1969, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, Michael T.: 1974, 'A Radical Solution to the Species Problem', Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay: 1980, The Panda's Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History, W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay: 1989, 'Punctuated Equilibrium in Fact and Theory', Journal of Social and Biological Structures 12(2/3), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay and Richard C. Lewontin: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205, 581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, Glenn A.: 1992, 'Leibniz's Phenomenalisms', The Philosophical Review 101(3), 511–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Roland: 1967, 'Monism and Pluralism', in Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 5, Macmillan, New York, pp. 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves Heap, Shaun: 1989, Rationality in Economics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von: 1967, 'Notes on the Evolution of Systems of Rules of Conduct: The Interplay between Rules of Individual Conduct and the Social Order of Actions', in Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ch. 4, pp. 66–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. von: 1988, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, ed. by W.W. Bartley, III. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M.: 1993, Economics and Evolution: Bringing Back Life into Economics, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (ed.).: 1995, Economics and Biology, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, UK.

  • Hull, David L.: 1980, 'Individuality and Selection', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerferd, G.B.: 1981, The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1990a, 'Natural Complex vs. Natural System', Journal of Social and Biological Structures 13(1), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1990b, 'Rationality and Social Labor in Marx', Critical Review 4(1&2), 239–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1992a, 'Nature and Abstract Labor in Marx', Social Concept 6(2), 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1992b, 'Economics and Biology: Eight Areas of Research', Methodus 4(2), 29–45. (Reprinted in Hodgson, 1995.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1993a, 'Neo-classical Economics and Neo-Darwinism: Clearing the Way for Historical Thinking', in Ron Blackwell, Jaspal Chatha, and Edward J. Nell (eds.), Economics as Worldly Philosophy, Macmillan, London, pp. 22–72. (Reprinted in Hodgson, 1995.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1993b, 'Is Poincaréan Nonlinear Dynamics the Alternative to the Selection Theory of Evolution?', Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 16(4), 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1994, 'Entropy and Economics', in GeoffreyM. Hodgson,Warren J. Samuels, and Marc R. Tool (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, Edward Elgar, A-K. Aldershot, UK, pp. 186–193.

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1995a, 'Has Economics Progressed? Rectilinear, Historicist, Universalist, and Evolutionary Historiographies', History of Political Economy 27(1), 43–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1995b, 'Organizations Versus Institutions', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 151(3), 445–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1995c, 'Organizations, Naturalism, and Complexity', Review of Social Economy 53(3), 393–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1995d, 'Nonlinear Thermodynamics and Social Science Modeling: Fad Cycles, Cultural Development and Identificational Slips', American Journal of Economics and Sociology 54(4), 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1995e, 'The Socioculturalist Agenda in Economics: Critical Remarks of Thorstein Veblen's Legacy', Journal of Socio-Economics 24(4), 545–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1995f, 'Ecological Economics and Ecological Darwinism', Journal of Biological Systems 3(4), 1211–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1996a, 'Economic Action, Naturalism, and Purposefulness', Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 14, 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1996b, 'Institutions, Naturalism, and Evolution', A working paper.

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1996c, 'Friedrich Hayek's Darwinian Theory of Evolution of Institutions: Two Problems', Australian Economic Papers 35, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias L.: 1997, 'Respect, Admiration, Aggrandizement: Adam Smith as Economic Psychologist', Journal of Economic Psychology 18.

  • Khalil, Elias L. and Kenneth E. Boulding (eds.).: 1996, Evolution, Order and Complexity, Routledge, London.

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude: 1972, Structural Anthropology, Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, Richard and Richard Lewontin: 1985, The Dialectical Biologist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Marion J., Jr.: 1968, 'Structural-Functional Analysis', in David L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 6, Macmillan and Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, Brian J.: 1991, Equilibrium and Evolution: An Exploration of Connecting Principles in Economics, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1991, 'Naturalistic Approaches to the Concept of Justice: Perspectives from Political Philosophy and Biology', American Behavioral Scientist 34(3), 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1993, Beyond Relativism: Science and Human Values, University Press of New England, Hanover, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1959, 'Where Are We?', Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1976, Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1988, Toward aNew Philosophy of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1992, 'The Idea of Teleology', Journal of the History of Ideas 53, 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Donald N.: 1985, The Rhetoric of Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Bill and Howard Aldrich: 1983, 'Populations, Natural Selection, and Applied Organizational Science', Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, R. (ed.): 1982, Perspectives of Evolution, Sinaver Associations, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E.: 1959, 'Are the Characteristics of Particular Things Universal or Particular?', in Philosophical Papers, Collier Books, New York, pp. 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C.: 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, Martin: 1988, 'Convolution and Involution: The Career of the Biological Organism in Economic Discourse', Social Concept 5(1), 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Driscoll, Gerald P. and Mario J. Rizzo: 1985, The Economics of Time and Ignorance, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, W.D.: 1949, 'Can Naturalism Be Materialistic?', Journal of Philosophy 46, 608–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean: 1971, Biology and Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, Karl: 1983, A History of Economic Reasoning, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, A.M.: 1966, 'Pluralism and Monism', Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 18, William Benton, Chicago, pp. 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A.R.: 1949, 'Functionalism: A Protest', American Anthropologist 51(2), 320–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A.R.: 1952, Structure and Function in Primitive Society, Cohen & West, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Robert J.: 1986, 'A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics', Biology & Philosophy 1(3), 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S.: 1987, Molecules and Minds: Essays on Biology and the Social Order, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, Michael: 1989, 'Do Organisms Exist?', American Zoologist 29(3), 1061-dy1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1956, 'On the Relations of Universals and Particulars', in Robert Charles Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Edward Stuart: (1916) 1982, Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology, intro. by G.V. Lauder, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, Malcolm: 1989, 'What is Wrong with the New Institutional Economics (and What is Still Wrong with the Old)?', Review of Political Economy 3(1), 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Kelly C.: 1992, 'Neo-Rationalism Versus Neo-Darwinism: Integrating Development and Evolution', Biology & Philosophy 7(4), 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott: 1981, 'Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection', in P.D. Asquith and R.N. Giere (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association, 1980, vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Ian: 1977, Marx after Sraffa, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, Alfred I. (ed.): 1991, Organism and the Origins of Self, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Michael, Richard Ellis, and Aaron Wildavsky: 1990, Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

  • Vanberg, Viktor J.: 1992, 'Organizations as Constitutional Systems', Constitutional Political Economy 3(2), 223–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G.C. and B.C. Goodwin: 1982, 'The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach', Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5(1), 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, George C.: 1992, Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, David Sloan: 1983, 'The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14, 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, David Sloan and Elliott Sober: 1989, 'Reviving the Superorganism', Journal of Theoretical Biology 136, 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Ohio State University and University of Chicago, USA

    ELIAS L. KHALIL

Authors
  1. ELIAS L. KHALIL
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KHALIL, E.L. Economics, Biology, and Naturalism: Three Problems Concerning the Question of Individuality. Biology & Philosophy 12, 185–206 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006595014078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006595014078

Search

Navigation