Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy, Instinct, Intuition: What Motivates the Scientist in Search of a Theory?

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article questions whether philosophical considerations play any substantial role in the actual process of scientific research. Using examples mostly from the nineteenth century, it suggests that scientists generally choose their basic theoretical orientation, and their research strategies, on the basis of non-rationalized feelings which might be described as instinct or intuition. In one case where methodological principles were the driving force (Charles Lyell's uniformitarian geology), the effect was counterproductive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartholomew, M.: 1973, ‘Lyell and Evolution’, British Journal of the History of Science 6, 261–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P.J.: 1983, The Eclipse of Darwinism, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J.: 1995, Charles Darwin: Voyaging, Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1958, Barlow, Nora (ed.), The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1987, Barrett, P.H. et al. (eds.), Charles Darwin's Theoretical Notebooks, 1836- 1844, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M.J.S. and Kohn, D.: 1985, ‘The Immediate Origins of Natural Selection’, in Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnello, E.: 1999, ‘The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson's Career at University College’, History of Science 37, 7–106, 123-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J.: 1928, ‘Organicism in Biology’, Journal of Philosophical Studies 3, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M.J.S.: 1990, ‘Introduction’, in Lyell, C. (ed.), Principles of Geology, rep. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N.: 1993, Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1979, The Darwinian Revolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, J.: 1997, ‘Introduction’, in Lyell, C. (ed.), Principles of Geology, rep. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G.: 1992, ‘William Bateson and the Science of Form’, in Bateson, W., Materials for the Study of Variation, rep. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowler, P.J. Philosophy, Instinct, Intuition: What Motivates the Scientist in Search of a Theory?. Biology & Philosophy 15, 93–101 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006672807518

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006672807518

Navigation