Skip to main content
Log in

City size distributions and metropolisation

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many controversial questions about the shape and evolution of city size distributions can be solved if reliable, large and comparable set of data are used for several countries. We provide new empirical evidence by using the large data base ‘Geopolis’, which has strictly comparable figures for all towns and cities of the world over 10,000 inhabitants between 1950 and 1990. A Pareto model is used for identifying as metropolises one or a few large cities for each national urban system. From those data, two empirical power laws are established, linking the size of the metropolises to the size of their national urban system. The first is a transversal law: for a set of countries at a given date, the share of population concentrated in metropolises tends to decrease when larger countries are considered. The second law, which is longitudinal, shows that metropolises in the past have grown in a systematic way more rapidly than the rest of their urban system, invalidating Gibrat's urban growth model. Such empirical regularities could help for predicting the future of nowadays observed metropolisation trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P.; Sanglier, M.: Dynamic models of urban growth. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 2, 269–278 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alperovich, G.: An explanatory model of city-size distribution: Evidence from cross-country data. Urban Studies 9, 1591–1601 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, F.: Metropolis. Paris, Odile Jacob, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, F.: Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration. Petermans Mitteilungen 59(1), 74–76 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairoch, P.; Batou, J.; Chèvre, P.; La population des villes européennes de 800 à 1850. Genève, Droz, Centre d'histoire économique internationale, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbut M.: Des bons et des moins bons usages des distributions paretiennes en analyse des données. Histoire et Mesure 3(1), 111–128, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M.; McPherson, M.J.: City size distribution in a central place hierarchy: an alternative approach. Journal of Regional Science 10(1), 25–33 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.J.L.; Garrison, W.L.: Alternate explanations of urban rank size relationships. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1, 83–91 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.J.L.: Cities as systems within systems of cities, Papers of the Regional Science Association 13, 147–163 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bura, S.; Guérin-Pace, F.; Mathian, H.; Pumain, D.; Sanders, L.: Multi-agent systems and the dynamics of settlement systems. Geographical Analysis 2, 161–178 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G.P.: The application of information theory to the analysis of population distribution in space, Economic Geography 2, 317–333 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W.: Zentralen Orte in Süddendeutschland. Iena, Fischer, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L.: The random spatial economy: an exploration in settlement theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 138–146 (1964).

  • De Vries, J.: European Urbanization, 1500–1800. London and Cambridge, (Mass.) 1984.

  • Fletcher, R.: Settlement archaeology: world-wide comparisons, World Archaeology 18(1) 59–83 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R.: Les inégalités économiques. Paris, Sirey, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin-Pace, F.: Deux siècles de croissance urbaine. Paris, Anthropos, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haran, E.G.P.; Vining, D.R.: On the implications of a stationary urban population for the size distribution of cities. Geographical Analysis 5(4), 296–308 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janelle, D.G.: Spatial reorganization: a model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 348–368 (1969).

  • Juillard, E.: L'armature urbaine de la France préindustrielle. Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg 6, (1970).

  • Mackinder, H.J.: The physical basis of political geography. Scottisch Geographical Magazine VI, 78–84 (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden: On some indications of stability in the growth of cities in the United States. Economic Development and Cultural change 4, 236–252 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E.J.: Growth and change in the analysis of rank-size distributions: empirical findings. Environment and Planning 12, 41–52 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F.T.: A note on city size distributions. Economic Development and Cultural Change vol. 7(1), 17–37 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriconi-Ebrard, F.: L'urbanisation du monde. Paris, Anthropos, coll. Villes, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriconi-Ebrard, F.: Geopolis, pour comparer les villes du monde. Paris, Anthropos, coll. Villes, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R.: Migration and the Spread and Growth of Urban Settlement. Lund Studies in Geography, serie B, no26, 1965.

  • Parr, J.B.: Models of city size in an urban system. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 25, 221–253 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J.B.: A note of the size distribution of cities over time. Journal of Regional Economics vol. 18, 99–212 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J.B.; Reiner, T.A.: A note on the dimensions of a national urban settlement system. Urban Studies 2, 223–230 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D.: La dynamique des villes. Paris, Economica 231 p. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D.; Robic, M.C.: Théoriser la ville. In: Derycke P.H.; Huriot J.M.; Pumain D. (eds.), Penser la ville, pp. 107–161. Paris: Anthropos 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D.: Pour une théorie évolutive des villes, L'Espace Géographique 2, 119–134 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, R.E.: Statistical discrimination among alternate hypothesis and some economic regularities. Journal of Regional Science 5(2), 1–23 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reclus, E.: The evolution of cities. The Contemporary Review 67(2), 246–264 (1895).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, B.: 1973, Urban Growth, an approach. London, Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, K.T.; Resnick, M.: The size distribution of cities: an examination of Pareto Law and Primacy. Journal or Urban Economics 8, 165–186 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E.: City size distribution and spatial economic change. International Regional Science Review, vol. 7, 127–151 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: On a class of skew distributions. Biometrika, 42, 425–440 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindl, J.: Random processes and the growth of firms. New York: Hofnur 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Villa, L.: Metropolitan Evolution, Sectoral Economic Change, and the City Size Distribution. Urban Studies 25(1), 1–20 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G.K.: Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Cambridge (Mass.), Addison Wesley 1949.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pumain, D., Moriconi-Ebrard, F. City size distributions and metropolisation. GeoJournal 43, 307–314 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006833025206

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006833025206

Navigation