Abstract
This paper analyses from an empirical point of view the technology underlying the Water industry. Firstly, we study the impact of environmental and quality factors on the production process. Secondly, different functional forms are analysed in order to represent the technology. Overall results show that the coefficient of hedonic variables are significant and that the best functional form is the transcendental logarithmic one. Finally, evidence on return to scale depends on the functional form adopted and on the inclusion ofhedonic variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battiato, S. and Giardina, E. (1983) 'Il servizio comunale di acquedotto', in FORMEZ, 'Analisi dei costi dei servizi degli enti locali nel mezzogiorno', Quaderni Regionali 42, 92-126.
Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., and Tretheway, M.W. (1984) 'Economies of Density Versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Services Airline Cost Differ', The Rand Journal of Economics 15(4), 471-489.
Clagget,.T. (1994) 'A Cost Function Study of the Providers of TVA Power', Managerial and Decision Economics 15, 63-72.
Clark, R.M. and Stevie, R. (1981) 'A Water Supply Cost Model Incorporating Spatial Variables', Land Economics 57(1), 18-320.
Crain, W.M. and Zardkoohi, A. (1978) 'A Test of the Property Rights Theory of the Firm: Water Utilities in the United States', The Journal of Law and Economics 21, 395-4080.
Feigenbaum, S. and Teeples, R. (1983) 'Public Versus Private Delivery: A Hedonic Approach, Review of Economics and Statistics 65, 672-678.
Ford, J.L. and Warford, J.J. (1969) 'Cost Functions for theWater Industry', The Journal of Industrial Economics 18, 53-63.
Guldmann, J.M. (1983), 'Modeling the Structure of Gas Distribution Costs in Urban Areas', Regional Science and Urban Economics 13(3), 299-316.
Guldmann, J.M. (1984), 'A Further Note on the Structure of Gas Distribution Costs in Urban Areas', Regional Science and Urban Economics 14, 583-588.
Guldmann, J.M. (1985), 'Economies of Scale and Natural Monopoly in Urban Utilities: The Case of Natural Gas Distribution', Geografical Analysisi 17(4), 302-317.
Hines, L.G. (1969) 'The Long-Run Cost Function of Water Production for Selected Wisconsin Communities', Land Economics 133-140.
ISTAT (1991) Acquedotti e reti di distribuzione dell'acqua potabile in Italia-Anno 1987.
Nadiri, M.I. and Schankerman, M.A. (1981) 'The Structure of Production, Technological Change and the Rate of Growth of Total Factor Productivity in the U.S. Bell System', in T. Cowing and R. E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industry.
Nelson, R.A. and Primeaux, W.J. (1988) The Effects of Competition on Transmission and Distribution Costs in the Municipal Electric Industry', Land Economics 64(4), 338-346.
Panzar, J. C. (1989) 'Technological Determinants of Firms and Industry Structure', in Schmolensee, R. and Willig R.D. (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization 1.
Pola, G. and Visco Comandini, V. (1987) 'Applicazione di un modello econometrico al servizio di acquedotto', in Bognetti and Magnani (eds.), I servizi pubblici locali tra equità ed efficienza.
Shephard, R.W. (1953) Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Shin, R.T. and Ying, J.S. (1992) 'Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone', Rand Journal of Economics 23(2), 171-183.
Spady, R.H. and Friedlaender, A.F. (1978) 'Hedonic Cost Functions for the Regulated Trucking Industry', The Bell Journal of Economics 9(1), 159-179.
Teeples, R. and Glyer, D. (1987) 'Cost of Water Delivery Systems: Specification and Ownership Effects', The Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 399-408.
Visco Comandini, V. (1985) 'Costi ed offerta del servizio idrico comunale', Economia Pubblica 12, 591-608.
Wilson, W.W. (1997) 'Cost Savings and Productivity in the Railroad Industry', Journal of Regulatory Economics 1, 21-40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fabbri, P., Fraquelli, G. Costs and Structure of Technology in the Italian Water Industry. Empirica 27, 65–82 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007092212799
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007092212799