Skip to main content
Log in

Externalities, knowledge spillovers and the spatial distribution of innovation

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to investigate the process of spatial agglomeration of innovation and production activities and to assess the extent to which the degree of specialisation or diversity externalities in the area may affect the innovative output in a particular local industry. The analysis is carried out thanks to an original databank on innovation and production activity across 85 industrial sectors and 784 Italian Local Labour Systems, which are groupings of municipalities characterised by a high degree of self-contained flows of commuting workers. According to the global and local indicators of spatial association there are clear signs of spatial correlation in the distribution of innovation activities. The econometric analysis shows that the two types of externalities – specialisation and urbanisation economies – are both effective. Moreover, we find evidence for knowledge spillovers since technological activities of a local industry influence positively innovations of the same sectors in contiguous areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L., 1988: Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L., 1995: Local Indicators of Spatial Association — LISA. Geographical Analysis 27: 93-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur W.B., 1988: Self-reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics. In: Anderson P., Arrow K. and Pines D. (eds), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Redwood City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. and Feldman M., 1996: R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86: 631-640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman E., Caballero R. and Lyons R., 1994: Customer-and supplier-driven externalities. American Economic Review 84: 1075-1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini G., (ed.), 1987: Mercato e Forze Locali. Il Distretto Industriale. Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi S., 1997: The geography of innovation: a cross-section analysis. CESPRI WP, No. 95 Università Bocconi, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer E., Budil-Nadvornikova H. and Kleinknecht A., 1999: Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product announcements. Regional Studies 33: 541-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulhart M., 1998: Economic geography, industry location and trade: the evidence. World Economy, 21: 775-801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S., 1982: The emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 167-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R., (ed), 1991: Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. Belhaven Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniels M., 1999: Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth: Regional Growth Differentials across Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello R., 1999: Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieux: learning versus collective learning processes. Regional Studies 33: 353-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P. and Hay D.G., 1989: Urban Problems in Western Europe: an Economic Analysis. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe D. and Helpman E., 1995: International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review 39: 859-887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P. and Morgan K., 1994: The creative milieu: a regional perspective on innovation. In: Dodgson M. and Rothwell R. (eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G. and Glaeser E, 1999: The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89: 301-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson R., 1993: Patents, R&D and invention potential: international evidence. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 83: 463-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M., 1994: The Geography of Innovation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M. and Audretsch D., 1999: Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E., Kallal H., Scheinkman J. and Sheifler A., 1992: Growth of cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126-1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson V, Kuncoro A. and Turner M., 1995: Industrial development of cities. Journal of Political Economy 103: 1067-1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT 1998: Statistiche sulla ricerca scientifica e l'innovazione tecnologica. Roma.

  • Jacobs J., 1969: The Economy of Cities. Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. and Henderson R., 1993: Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly M. and Hageman A., 1999: Marshallian externalities in innovation. Journal of Economic Growth 4: 39-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P., 1991: Economic Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamorgese A., 1997: Externalities, economic geography and growth: a cross-section analysis. CESPRI WP, No. 100.

  • Lawson C. and Lorenz E., 1999: Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies 33: 305-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R.E., 1993; Making a miracle. Econometrica 61: 251-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A., 1890: Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P. and Malmberg A., 1999: Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 167-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano I. and Puga D., 1998: Agglomeration in the global economy: a survey of the ‘new economic geography’. World Economy, 21: 707-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paci R. and Usai S., 2000a: Technological enclaves and industrial districts. An analysis of the regional distribution of innovative activity in Europe. Regional Studies 34: 97-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paci R. and Usai S. (2000b) The role of specialisation and diversity externalities in the agglomeration of innovative activities. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti (in press).

  • Pyke F., Becattini G. and Sengenberger W. (eds) 1990: Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P., 1986: Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi F. (ed.), 1997: I sistemi locali del lavoro 1991. Argomenti no.10. ISTAT, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen B., 1999: European regional clubs: do they exist and where are they heading? On economic and technological differences between European regions. In: Adams J. and Pigliaru, F. (eds), Economic Growth and Change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel E., 1995: Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40: 429-439.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paci, R., Usai, S. Externalities, knowledge spillovers and the spatial distribution of innovation. GeoJournal 49, 381–390 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007192313098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007192313098

Navigation