Skip to main content
Log in

Generalised Cost Functions for Producers of Performing Arts – Allocative Inefficiencies and Scale Economies in Theatres

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the structure of the production of cultural services by using a generalised cost function and a panel data set of theatres. The main points of interest are: first, whether the production of theatrical performances is allocatively efficient, second, whether underlying production technology exhibits homotheticity with respect to output, and third, whether there exist economic gains from large scale production. The results of the analysis suggest that inputs are not combined in optimal proportions in light of prevailing market prices, that relative shares of input utilisation vary when output expands, and that there are scale economies in the production of theatrical performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, S.E. and Halvorsen, R. (1980) “A Test of Relative and Absolute Price Efficiency in Regulated Utilities”. The Review of Economics and Statistics 62: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S.E. and Halvorsen, R. (1984) “Parametric Efficiency Tests, Economies of Scale, and Input Demand in U.S. Electric Power Generation”. International Economic Review 24(3): 647–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S.E. and Halvorsen, R. (1986) “The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Regulated Environment: the Case of U.S. Electric Utilities”. Journal of Public Economics 29: 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1988) “Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalised Frontier Production Function and Panel Data”. Journal of Econometrics 38: 387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.G. (1989) Applied Production Analysis – A Dual Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L.R., Jörgenson, D.W. and Lau, L. (1973) “Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function”. Econometrica 39: 255–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowing, T.G. (1981) “Duality and the Estimation of a Restricted Technology”, in V.K. Smith, ed., Advances in Applied Micro-Economics Vol. II, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1987) “Nonprofit Organizations in the Production and Distribution of Culture”, in W.W. Powell, ed., The Nonprofit Sector – A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, K. and Kiesner, T. (1988) “Estimating a Non-Minimum Cost Function for Hospitals”. Southern Economic Journal 54(3), 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S. (1990) “A Distance Function Approach to Price Efficiency”. Journal of Public Economics 43: 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gapinski, J.H. (1979) “The Production of Culture”. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2: 578–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S. and Book, S. (1974) “Statistical Cost Functions for Performing Arts Organisations”. Southern Economic Journal 40: 668–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (1993) “The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis”, in H.O. Fried, K.C.A. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds, The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollas, D.R. and Stansell, S.R. (1988) “An Examination of the Effect of Ownership Form on Price Efficiency: Proprietary, Cooperative and Municipal Electric Utilities”. Southern Economic Journal 55(2): 336–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (1988) “A Museum Cost Function”. Journal of Cultural Economics 12: 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S.C. (1991a) “The Measurement and Decomposition of Cost-Inefficiency: the Translog Cost System”. Oxford Economic Papers 43: 667–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S.C. (1991b) “Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in Panel Data Models with Firmand Time-Specific Effects”. Economic Letters 36: 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S.C. and Hjalmarsson, L. (1993) “Technical Efficiency and Technical Progress in Swedish Dairy Farms”, in H.O. Fried, K.C.A. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds, The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, M., Bullard, J., Luksetich, W. and Jacobs, P. (1985) “Cost Functions for Symphony Orchestras”. Journal of Cultural Economics 9: 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L.J. and Yotopoulos, P.A. (1971) “A Test for Relative Efficiency and Application to Indian Agriculture”. The American Economic Review 61: 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C.A.K. (1993) “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency”, in H.O. Fried, K.C.A. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds, The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.A. and Wohar, M.E. (1983) “Regulation, Scale Economies, and Productivity in Stream-Electric Generation”. International Economic Review 24: 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, O. (1993) “Approche des coûts des musées”. A paper presented in the 2e Conférence Internationale sur le Management des Arts et de la Culture, June 23–25, 1993, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

  • Pescatrice, D.R. and Trapani, J.M. (1980) “The Performance and Objectives of Public and Private Utilities Operating in the United States”. Journal of Public Economics 13: 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P., Sickles, R.C. (1984) “Production Frontiers and Panel Data”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 4: 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles, R., Good, D. and Johnson, R. (1986) “Allocative Distortions and the Regulatory Transition of the Airline Industry”. Journal of Econometrics 33: 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, R.M. (1974) “Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: An Empirical Test of the Averch-Johnson Thesis”. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5: 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taalas, M.A. (1994) “The Cost Function Approach Towards Nonprofit Cultural Institutions – The Case of Finnish Museums”. A paper presented in the 8th International Conference on Cultural Economics, August 24–27, 1994, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.

  • Toda, Y. (1976) “Estimation of a Cost Function when Cost is not Minimum: The Case of Soviet Manufacturing Industries, 1958–1971”. Review of Economics and Statistics August: 259–268.

  • Throsby, D. (1977) “Production and Cost Relationships in the Supply of Performing Arts Services”, in K. Tucker, ed., Economics of the Australian Services Sector, Groom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1994) “The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics”. Journal of Economic Literature XXXII: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taalas, M. Generalised Cost Functions for Producers of Performing Arts – Allocative Inefficiencies and Scale Economies in Theatres. Journal of Cultural Economics 21, 335–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007488907323

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007488907323

Navigation