Skip to main content
Log in

Using Sequential Indicator Simulation as a Tool in Reservoir Description: Issues and Uncertainties

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flow simulation studies require an accurate model of the reservoir in terms of its sedimentological architecture. Pixel-based reservoir modeling techniques are often used to model this architecture. There are, however, two problem areas with such techniques. First, several statistical parameters have to be provided whose influence on the resulting model is not readily inferable. Second, conditioning the models to relevant geological data that carry great uncertainty on their own adds to the difficulty of obtaining reliable models and assessing model reliability. The Sequential Indicator Simulation (SIS) method has been used to examine the impact of such uncertainties on the final reservoir model. The effects of varying variogram types, frequencies of lithology occurrence, and the gridblock model orientation with respect to the sedimentological trends are illustrated using different reservoir modeling studies. Results indicate, for example, that the choice of variogram type can have a significant impact on the facies model. Also, reproduction of sedimentological trends and large geometries requires careful parameter selection. By choosing the appropriate modeling strategy, sedimentological principles can be translated into the numerical model. Solutions for dealing with such issues and the geological uncertainties are presented. In conclusion, each reservoir modeling study should begin by developing a thorough quantitative sedimentological understanding of the reservoir under study, followed by detailed sensitivity analyses of relevant statistical and geological parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alabert, F. G., and Massonnat, G. J., 1990, Heterogeneity in a complex turbiditic reservoir: stochastic modelling of facies and petrophysical variability: paper SPE 20604 presented at the 1990 SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, Sept. 23–26, p. 775-790.

  • Alabert, F. G., and Modot, V., 1992, Stochastic models of reservoir heterogeneity: Impact on connectivity and average permeabilities: paper SPE 24893 presented at the 1992 SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Washington, DC, Oct. 4–7, p. 355-370.

  • Begg, S. H., Kay, A., Gustason, E. R., and Angert, P. F., 1994, Characterization of a complex fluvial-deltaic reservoir for simulation: paper SPE 28398 presented at the 1994 SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, Sept. 25–28, p. 375-384.

  • Bierkens, M. F. P., 1996, Modeling hydraulic conductivity of a complex confining layer at various spatial scales: Water Resources Res., v. 32, no. 8, p. 2369–2382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, G., 1996, Probability field for the post-processing of stochastic simulations: Math. Geology, v. 28, no. 6, p. 723–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G., 1992, GSLIB-Geostatistical Software Library and user's guide: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 340 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldorsen, H. H., and Damsleth, E., 1990, Stochastic modelling: Jour. Petrol. Tech., v. 42, no. 4, p. 404–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. L., Lake, L. W., Corbett, P. W. M., and Goggin, D. J., 1997, Statistics for petroleum engineers and geoscientists: Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, 390 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D. L., and Goggin, D. J., 1995, An application of categorical indicator geostatistics for facies modelling in sand-rich turbidite systems: paper SPE 30603 presented at the 1995 SPE Annual Technical Conference&Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Oct. 22–25, p. 781-792.

  • Journel, A. G., and Alabert, F. G., 1990, New method for reservoir mapping: Jour. Petrol. Tech., v. 42, no. 2, p. 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., and Go´ mez-Herna´ndez, J. J., 1989, Stochastic imaging of the Wilmington clastic sequence: paper SPE 19857 presented at the 1989 SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 8–11, p. 591-606.

  • Kelkar, M., and Shibli, S., 1994, Description of reservoir properties using fractals, in Yarus, J. M., and Chambers, R. L., eds., AAPGcomputer applications in geology No. 3, Stochastic modeling and geostatistics: Principles, methods and case studies: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, p. 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krum, G. L., and Johnson, C. R., 1993, A 3-D modelling approach for providing a complex reservoir description for reservoir simulations, in Flint, S. S., and Bryant, I. D., eds., Special Publication No. 15, The geological modelling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and outcrop analogues: International Association of Sedimentologists, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p. 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. C., Høye, T. H., Lowry, P., Jacobsen, T., Aasen, J. O., and Grindheim, A. O., 1992, Stochastic flow unit modelling of a North Sea coastal-deltaic reservoir: First Break, v. 10, no. 4, p. 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massonnat, G. J., Alabert, F. G., and Giudicelli, C. B., 1992, Anguille Marine, a deepseafan reservoir offshore Gabon: From geology to stochastic modelling: paper SPE 24709 presented at the 1992 SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Washington, DC, Oct. 4–7, p. 477-492.

  • Pickup, G. E., Ringrose, P. S., Forrester, M. M., Jensen, J. L., and Sorbie, K. S., 1994a, The Geopseudo Atlas: Geologically based upscaling of multiphase flow: paper SPE 27565 presented at the European Petroleum Computer Conference, Aberdeen, UK, March 15–17, p. 277-289.

  • Pickup, G. E., Ringrose, P. S., Jensen, J. L., and Sorbie, K. S., 1994b, Permeability tensors for sedimentary structures: Math. Geology, v. 26, no. 2, p. 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup, G. E., Ringrose, P. S., Corbett, P. W. M., Jensen, J. L., and Sorbie, K. S., 1995, Geology, geometry and effective flow: Petroleum Geoscience, v. 1, no. 1, p. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, D., Lewis, J. J. M., Hern, C. Y., and Steel, N. C. T., 1996, Well placement optimisation and risking using 3-D stochastic reservoir modelling techniques: paper SPE 35520 presented at the 1996 SPE/NPF European 3-D Reservoir Modelling Conference,Stavanger, Norway, April 16–17, p. 289-300.

  • Seifert, D., and Jensen, J. L., 1997, Object and pixel-based reservoir modelling of a braided fluvial reservoir: Proceedings of the 1997 International Association of Mathematical Geology Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 22–27 September, p. 719-724.

  • Seifert, D., Newbury, J. D. H., Ramsey, C., and Lewis, J. J. M., 1999, Evaluation of field development plans using 3-D reservoir modelling, in Schatzinger, R., and Jordan, J., eds., AAPG memoir no. 71, Recent advances in reservoir characterization. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. M., 1994, An overview of stochastic methods for reservoir characterization, in Yarus, J. M., and Chambers, R. L., eds., AAPG computer applications in geology no. 3, Stochastic modeling and geostatistics: Principles, methods and case studies: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, p. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seifert, D., Jensen, J.L. Using Sequential Indicator Simulation as a Tool in Reservoir Description: Issues and Uncertainties. Mathematical Geology 31, 527–550 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007563907124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007563907124

Navigation