Skip to main content
Log in

Social Networks and Individual Perceptions: Explaining Differential Participation in Social Movements

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain differential participation in social movements. It does so by attempting to bridge structural-level and individual-level explanations. We test a number of hypotheses drawn from the social networks and the rationalist perspectives on individual engagement by means of survey data on members of a major organization of the Swiss solidarity movement. Both perspectives find empirical support: the intensity of participation depends both on the embeddedness in social networks and on the individual perceptions of participation, that is, the evaluation of a number of cognitive parameters related to engagement. In particular, to be recruited by an activist and the perceived effectiveness of one's own potential contribution are the best predictors of differential participation. We specify the role of networks for social movements by looking at the nature and content of networks and by distinguishing between three basic functions of networks: structurally connecting prospective participants to an opportunity to participate, socializing them to a protest issue, and shaping their decision to become involved. The latter function implies that the embeddedness in social networks significantly affects the individual perceptions of participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Andews, Molly 1991 Lifetimes of Commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, Steven E., Steven F. Cohn, and William H. Whitaker 1995 “Beyond recruitment: Predictors of differential participation in a national antihunger organization.” Sociological Forum 10:113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre 1980 Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes 1960 The AmericanVoter. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazel, François 1986 “Individualisme, mobilisation et action collective.” In Pierre Birnbaum and Jean Leca (eds.), Sur l'individualisme: 213–238. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Dennis 1991 Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, Donatella 1988 “Recruitment processes in clandestine political organizations: Italian leftwing terrorism.” In Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow (eds.), From Structure to Action: 155–172. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 Il terrorismo di sinistra. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1995 Social Movements, Political Violence and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Jeff Goodwin 1994 “Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1411–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Roberto M., and Doug McAdam 1988 “Social networks and social movements: Multiorganizational fields and recruitement to Mississippi Freedom Summer.” Sociological Forum 3:357–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Multiorganizational fields and recruitment to social movements.” In Bert Klandermans (ed.), Organizing for Change: 315–343. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fireman, Bruce, and William A. Gamson 1979 “Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective.” In Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy (eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements: 8–44. Cambridge: Winthrop Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1992a Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992b “The social psychology of collective action.” In Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory: 53–76. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1995 “Constructing social protest.” In Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans (eds.), Social Movements and Culture: 85–106. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani 1989 “Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power.” American Journal of Sociology 95:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giugni, Marco, and Florence Passy 1998 “Contentious politics in complex societies: New social movements between conflict and cooperation.” In Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Tilly (eds.), From Contention to Democracy: 81–107. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Roger V. 1993 “Collective action and network structure.” American Sociological Review 58:182–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1995 Insurgent Identities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark 1973 “The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Russell 1982 Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Eric L. 1990 “Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement.” American Sociological Review 55:243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins J. Craig, and Charles Perrow 1977 “Insurgency of the powerless: Farm workers movements.” American Sociological Review 42:249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hyojoung, and Peter S. Bearman 1997 “The structure and dynamics of movement participation.” American Sociological Review 62:70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert 1984 “Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory.” American Sociological Review 49:583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert, and Dirk Oegema 1987 “Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers: Steps toward participation in social movements.” American Sociological Review 52:519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud 1995 Democracy from Below. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter 1988 “Local mobilization for the people's social petition of the Dutch peace movement.” In Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow (eds.), From Structure to Action: 41–83. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “New social movements and the new class in the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology 94:1087–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 Political Mobilization and Social Change. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco Giugni 1995 New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, Michael 1991 “Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects of collective action.” American Sociological Review 56:730–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, Gerald, and Pamela Oliver 1993 The Critical Mass in Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug 1982 Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92:64–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988a Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988b “Micromobilization contexts and recruitment to activism.” In Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow (eds.), From Structure to Action: 125–154. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, and Ronnelle Paulsen 1993 "Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of sociology 99:640–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald 1988 “Social movements.” In Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology: 695–737. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto 1989 Nomads of the Present. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996 Challenging Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Arthur G., and Melvin Seeman 1964 “Organizations and powerlessness: A test of the mediation hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 29:216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Pamela E. 1984 “ 'If you don't do it, nobody else will': Active and token contributors to local collective action.” American Sociological Review 49:601–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Pamela E., and Gerald Marwell 1992 “Mobilizing thechnologies for collective action.” In Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory: 251–273. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur 1965 The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter 1985 “Soft incentives and collective action: Participation in the anti-nuclear movement.” British Journal of Political Science 16:87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 The Rationality of Political Protest. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wolfgang Roehl 1990 “Repression, micromobilization, and political protest.” Social Forces 69:521–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passy, Florence 1998 L'action altruiste. Genève: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passy, Florence, and Marco Giugni 2000 “Life-spheres, networks, and sustained participation in social movements: A phenomenological approach to political commitment.” Sociological Forum 15:117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward 1979 Poor People's Movements. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzorno, Alessandro 1978 “Political exchange and collective identity in industrial conflicts.” In Colin Crouch and Alessandro Pizzorno (eds.), The Resurgence of Class Conflict inWestern Europe since 1968:277–298. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Sur la rationalité du choix démocratique.” In Pierre Birnbaum and Jean Leca (eds.), Sur l'individualisme: 330–369. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Naomi, Meryl Fingrutd, Michele Ethier, Roberta Karant, and David McDonald 1985 “Social movements and network analysis: A case study of nineteenth century women's reform in New York state.” American Journal of Sociology 90:1022–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Todd 1992 Collective Action. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, Cynthia W. 1980 “The impact of voluntary association involvement on social-psychological attitudes.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York.

  • Smith, David Horton 1994 “Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23:243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford 1992 “Master frames and cycles of protest.” In Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory: 133–155. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., Louis A. Zurcher, Jr., and Sheldon Ekland-Olson 1980 “Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment.” American Sociological Review 45:787–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford 1986 “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.” American Sociological Review 51:464–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney 1992 “Mentalities, political cultures, and collective action frames: Constructing meanings through action.” In Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory: 174–202. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles 1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 “Micro, macro, or megrim?” Columbia University, New York. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, John, and Marc Musick 1997 “Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of altruistic behavior.” American Sociological Review 62:694–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltfang, Gregory L., and Doug McAdam 1991 “A study of sanctuary movement activism.” Social Forces 69:987–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Louise G. 1976 “Rational theories of participation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 20:255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik O. 1985 Classes. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence Passy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Passy, F., Giugni, M. Social Networks and Individual Perceptions: Explaining Differential Participation in Social Movements. Sociological Forum 16, 123–153 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007613403970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007613403970

Navigation