Abstract
This paper summarises a contingent valuation study of willingness to pay forcleaning Lincoln Cathedral. A randomsample of the inhabitants of the city of Lincoln and the surrounding area wasquestioned as to their willingness topay for a change in the frequency of a hypothetical cleaning cycle from 40years to 10 years. This change wasillustrated by photographs which showed the same aspects of the Cathedralhalf-way through the two cleaning cycles.Individuals were also asked questions regarding their attitudes towards airpollution in general and its impact on theCathedral in particular. It was found that household willingness to pay isbest predicted by disposable income anda variable indicating distance from the site. Estimates of mean willingnessto pay range from £ 15 to £ 23 perhousehold per annum for those living Lincolnshire. Aggregating these valuesover the number of households inLincolnshire suggests that the annual damage inflicted by air pollution on theappearance of the building so far assoiling is concerned is valued between £ 0.4 m and £ 0.6 m.Different solutions to the problem of starting point biaswere explored and are shown to yield similar estimates of willingness to pay.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Leamer, E., Portney, P., Randner, R., and Schuman, H. (1993) “Natural Resource Damage Assessments under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990”. Federal Register 58 (10).
Bateman, I., Langford, I., and Rasbash, J. (1999) “Willingness to Pay Question Format Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies”, in I. Bateman and K. Willis (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Frey, B. (1997) “The Evaluation of Cultural Heritage: Some Critical Issues”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, Hants.
Bille Hansen, T. (1997) “The Willingness to Pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a Public Good”. Journal of Cultural Economics 21: 1-28.
Brown, T., Champ, P., Bishop, R., and McCollum, D. (1996) “Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?” Land Economics 2: 152-166.
Hanneman, W., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B. (1991) “Statistical Efficiency of Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1255-1263.
Haynie, F. (1986) cited in Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter Volume II. EPA/600/P-95/001F, USEPA, Washington D.C.
Herriges, J. and Shogren, J. (1996) 'Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (1): 112-131.
Kristrom, B. (1997) “Spike Models in Contingent Valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics”. 3: 1013-1023.
Lawrence, D. (1915) The Rainbow. (Reprinted 1971). Heineman Press, London.
Maddison, D. and Mourato, S. (1999) Valuing Different Road Options for Stonehenge, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE)Working Paper GEC 99-08, Department of Economics, University College London.
Manski, C. and Lerman, S. (1977) “Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice-Based Samples”. Econometrica 45: 1977-1988.
Martin, F. (1994) “Determining the Size of Museum Subsidies”. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 225-270.
Michell, R. and Carson, R. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington.
Morey, E., Rossman, K., Chestnut, L., and Ragland, S. (1997) Valuing Acid Deposition Injuries to Cultural Resources. Report to the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Programme (NAPAP), Washington D.C.
Navrud, S. (1992) in S. Navrud (ed.), Norway, Pricing the European Environment. Scandanavian University Press, Oslo.
Newby, P., Mansfield, T., and Hamilton, R. (1991) “Sources and Economic Implications of Building Soiling in Urban Areas”. The Science of the Total Environment 100: 347-365.
Office for National Statistics (1996) Mortality Statistics (General) 1993, 1994 and 1995. HMSO, London.
Office for National Statistics (1998) Regional Trends 33. HMSO, London.
Office for National Statistics (1999) Family Spending 1997/8. HMSO, London.
Santagata,W. and Signorello, G. (1998) Contingent Valuation and Cultural Policy Design: The Case of Napoli Musei Aperti. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection (File name 98100705.pdf).
Yates, T. Medhurst, J., and Pollicino, M. (1998) National Material Exposure Programme Part 3: Economic Evaluation of the Effect of Air Pollution on Buildings and Building Material. Buildings Research Establishment (BRE) Working Paper CR 160/98, BRE, Garston, Watford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollicino, M., Maddison, D. Valuing the Benefits of Cleaning Lincoln Cathedral. Journal of Cultural Economics 25, 131–148 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007653432745
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007653432745