Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching [and] Historical Understanding: Disciplining Historical Imagination with Historical Context

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The form, content, and practice of history has shifted including changes in conceptualization and practice that came in viewing history as social science, critiques and reconstructions of historical forms of knowledge, and debates about form, format, genre, and discourse. The central argument of this essay begins with the claim that history is a distinctive discipline. It's distinction lies not only, or even primarily, in its subject matter or materials. Rather, history is distinct as a form of inquiry and mode of understanding, with distinguishing characteristics of historical context and historical imagination. Important implications follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ankersmit, F. & Kellner, H. (Eds.). (1995). A new philosophy of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, J., Hunt, L., & Jacob, M. (1994). Telling the truth about history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters: On modernity, postmodernity and intellectuals. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, T. (1986). Wholes and parts: The need for synthesis in American history. Journal of American History, 73, 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhofer, R.F., Jr. (1969). A behavioral approach to historical analysis. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhofer, R.F., Jr. (1995). Beyond the great story: History as text and discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. (Ed.). (1992). Debating PC: The controversy over political correctness on college campuses. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berube, M. & Nelson, C. (Eds.). (1995). Higher education under fire: Politics, economics, and the crisis of the humanities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackey, R. (Ed.). (1995, October). Thinking historically in the classroom. Perspectives: American Historical Association Newsletter, 33, 1,4,23-35,37.

  • Bloch, M. (1953). The historian's craft (Trans. P. Putnam). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunzel, M., Smith, B.G., Higham, J. Appleby, J., Hunt, L., & Jacob, M. (1995). Truth, objectivity, and history: An exchange [on Telling the Truth About History by Appleby, Hunt, and Jacob]. Journal of the History of Ideas, 56, 651–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (Ed.). (1992). New perspectives on historical writing. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1995). Critical social theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D., Caplan, A.L. & Jennings, B. (Eds.). (1985). Applying the humanities. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1988). Making history: Agency, structure, and change in social theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. (1961). What is history? New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, E. (1981, December). History in crisis. Commonwealth, 18, 723–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, P. & The Bradley Commission on History in Schools. (Eds.). (1989). Historical literacy: The case for history in American education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H.J. (1979). The literacy myth: Literacy and social structure in the nineteenth-century city. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H.J. (1989). Critical literacy versus cultural literacy: Reading signs of the times. Review of the book Cultural Literacy. Interchange, 20(1), 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H.J. (1993). Literacy, myths, and legacies: Lessons from the past -Thought for the future. Interchange, 24(3), 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H.J. (1995). Conflicting paths: Growing up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, H. (1987). Historical consciousness in contemporary America. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Power and culture: Essays on the American working class (pp. 395–412). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamerow, T. (1987). The crisis in history. In T. Hamerow (Ed.), Reflections on history (pp. 3–38). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E.D. Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1972). The social function of the past: Some questions. Past and Present, 55, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1981). Looking forward: History and the future. New Left Review, 125, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1993, December). The new threat to history. New York Review, 16, 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H.S. (1964). History as art and as science. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. (1990). History beyond social theory. In D. Carroll (Ed.), The states of 'heory' History, art, and critical discourse (pp. 94–111). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. (1991). History as gesture; or, The scandal of history. In J. Arac & B. Johnson (Eds.), The consequences of theory: Selected papers from the English institute, 1987-1988, n.s. 14 (pp. 91–107). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K. (1991). Re-thinking history. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K. (1995). On “what is history?” from Carr and Elton to Rorty and White. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.B. (1987). Reconstructing American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.B. (1995). Improving poor people: The welfare state, the “underclass,” and urban schools as history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L., Reid, D., & Barney, W.L. (Eds.). (1994). Learning history in America: Schools, cultures, and politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D.S. & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (1971). History as social science. The behavioral and social sciences survey: History panel. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, G. (1992). On microhistory. In P. Burke (Ed.), New perspectives on historical writing (pp. 92–113). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Scott, J.W. & Strout, C. (1995). Forum: Telling the truth about history. History and theory, 34, 320–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (1970). The nature of history. New York: Delta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, R.E. & May, E.R. (1986). Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision makers. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D.J. & Wheeler, S. (Eds.). (1981). Social history and social policy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.W. (1988). Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.W. (1992). Women's history. In P. Burke (Ed.), New perspectives on historical writing (pp. 42–66). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (1983). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 301–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William H., Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.S. (1992). Context, time, history. In P. Karsten & J. Modell (Eds.), Theory, method, and practice in social and cultural history (pp. 13–32). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, P.N. (1991, April). The challenge of “historical literacy.” Perspectives: American Historical Association Newsletter, 29, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, P.N. (1993). Meaning over memory: Recasting the teaching of culture and history. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, D. (Ed.). (1987). Roundtable: Synthesis in American History. Journal of American History, 74, 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. (1972). Anthropology and the discipline of historical context. Midland History, 3, 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1981). As sociology meets history. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. & O'Connor, K. (1994). Multivoicedness in historical representation: American college students' accounts of the origins of the United States. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 4, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.V. (1966). The burden of history. History and Theory, 5, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.V. (1978). Tropics of discourse: Essay in culture criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (Ed.). (1995). PC wars: Politics and theory in the academy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.K. (1995). The myth of political correctness. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S.S. (Ed.). (1994). The teaching and learning of history. Educational Psychologist, 29(Special Issue), 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graff, H.J. Teaching [and] Historical Understanding: Disciplining Historical Imagination with Historical Context. Interchange 30, 143–169 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007669001861

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007669001861

Navigation