Abstract
The form, content, and practice of history has shifted including changes in conceptualization and practice that came in viewing history as social science, critiques and reconstructions of historical forms of knowledge, and debates about form, format, genre, and discourse. The central argument of this essay begins with the claim that history is a distinctive discipline. It's distinction lies not only, or even primarily, in its subject matter or materials. Rather, history is distinct as a form of inquiry and mode of understanding, with distinguishing characteristics of historical context and historical imagination. Important implications follow.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ankersmit, F. & Kellner, H. (Eds.). (1995). A new philosophy of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Appleby, J., Hunt, L., & Jacob, M. (1994). Telling the truth about history. New York: Norton.
Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters: On modernity, postmodernity and intellectuals. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bender, T. (1986). Wholes and parts: The need for synthesis in American history. Journal of American History, 73, 120–136.
Berkhofer, R.F., Jr. (1969). A behavioral approach to historical analysis. New York: Free Press.
Berkhofer, R.F., Jr. (1995). Beyond the great story: History as text and discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Berman, P. (Ed.). (1992). Debating PC: The controversy over political correctness on college campuses. New York: Dell.
Berube, M. & Nelson, C. (Eds.). (1995). Higher education under fire: Politics, economics, and the crisis of the humanities. New York: Routledge.
Blackey, R. (Ed.). (1995, October). Thinking historically in the classroom. Perspectives: American Historical Association Newsletter, 33, 1,4,23-35,37.
Bloch, M. (1953). The historian's craft (Trans. P. Putnam). New York: Vintage.
Brunzel, M., Smith, B.G., Higham, J. Appleby, J., Hunt, L., & Jacob, M. (1995). Truth, objectivity, and history: An exchange [on Telling the Truth About History by Appleby, Hunt, and Jacob]. Journal of the History of Ideas, 56, 651–680.
Burke, P. (Ed.). (1992). New perspectives on historical writing. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Calhoun, C. (1995). Critical social theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Callahan, D., Caplan, A.L. & Jennings, B. (Eds.). (1985). Applying the humanities. New York: Plenum.
Callinicos, A. (1988). Making history: Agency, structure, and change in social theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Carr, E.H. (1961). What is history? New York: Vintage.
Foner, E. (1981, December). History in crisis. Commonwealth, 18, 723–726.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
Gagnon, P. & The Bradley Commission on History in Schools. (Eds.). (1989). Historical literacy: The case for history in American education. New York: Macmillan.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Graff, H.J. (1979). The literacy myth: Literacy and social structure in the nineteenth-century city. New York: Academic Press.
Graff, H.J. (1989). Critical literacy versus cultural literacy: Reading signs of the times. Review of the book Cultural Literacy. Interchange, 20(1), 46–52.
Graff, H.J. (1993). Literacy, myths, and legacies: Lessons from the past -Thought for the future. Interchange, 24(3), 271–286.
Graff, H.J. (1995). Conflicting paths: Growing up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gutman, H. (1987). Historical consciousness in contemporary America. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Power and culture: Essays on the American working class (pp. 395–412). New York: Pantheon.
Hamerow, T. (1987). The crisis in history. In T. Hamerow (Ed.), Reflections on history (pp. 3–38). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hirsch, E.D. Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1972). The social function of the past: Some questions. Past and Present, 55, 3–17.
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1981). Looking forward: History and the future. New Left Review, 125, 3–20.
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1993, December). The new threat to history. New York Review, 16, 62–64.
Hughes, H.S. (1964). History as art and as science. New York: Harper and Row.
Hunt, L. (1990). History beyond social theory. In D. Carroll (Ed.), The states of 'heory' History, art, and critical discourse (pp. 94–111). New York: Columbia University Press.
Hunt, L. (1991). History as gesture; or, The scandal of history. In J. Arac & B. Johnson (Eds.), The consequences of theory: Selected papers from the English institute, 1987-1988, n.s. 14 (pp. 91–107). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jenkins, K. (1991). Re-thinking history. London: Routledge.
Jenkins, K. (1995). On “what is history?” from Carr and Elton to Rorty and White. London: Routledge.
Katz, M.B. (1987). Reconstructing American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Katz, M.B. (1995). Improving poor people: The welfare state, the “underclass,” and urban schools as history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kramer, L., Reid, D., & Barney, W.L. (Eds.). (1994). Learning history in America: Schools, cultures, and politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Landes, D.S. & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (1971). History as social science. The behavioral and social sciences survey: History panel. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Levi, G. (1992). On microhistory. In P. Burke (Ed.), New perspectives on historical writing (pp. 92–113). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Martin, R., Scott, J.W. & Strout, C. (1995). Forum: Telling the truth about history. History and theory, 34, 320–399.
Marwick, A. (1970). The nature of history. New York: Delta.
Neustadt, R.E. & May, E.R. (1986). Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision makers. New York: Free Press.
Rothman, D.J. & Wheeler, S. (Eds.). (1981). Social history and social policy. New York: Academic Press.
Scott, J.W. (1988). Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.
Scott, J.W. (1992). Women's history. In P. Burke (Ed.), New perspectives on historical writing (pp. 42–66). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Seixas, P. (1983). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 301–327.
Sewell, William H., Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.
Smith, D.S. (1992). Context, time, history. In P. Karsten & J. Modell (Eds.), Theory, method, and practice in social and cultural history (pp. 13–32). New York: New York University Press.
Stearns, P.N. (1991, April). The challenge of “historical literacy.” Perspectives: American Historical Association Newsletter, 29, 21–23.
Stearns, P.N. (1993). Meaning over memory: Recasting the teaching of culture and history. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Thelen, D. (Ed.). (1987). Roundtable: Synthesis in American History. Journal of American History, 74, 107–130.
Thompson, E.P. (1972). Anthropology and the discipline of historical context. Midland History, 3, 41–55.
Tilly, C. (1981). As sociology meets history. New York: Academic Press.
Wertsch, J.V. & O'Connor, K. (1994). Multivoicedness in historical representation: American college students' accounts of the origins of the United States. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 4, 295–309.
White, H.V. (1966). The burden of history. History and Theory, 5, 111–134.
White, H.V. (1978). Tropics of discourse: Essay in culture criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Williams, J. (Ed.). (1995). PC wars: Politics and theory in the academy. New York: Routledge.
Wilson, J.K. (1995). The myth of political correctness. Durham: Duke University Press.
Wineburg, S.S. (Ed.). (1994). The teaching and learning of history. Educational Psychologist, 29(Special Issue), 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graff, H.J. Teaching [and] Historical Understanding: Disciplining Historical Imagination with Historical Context. Interchange 30, 143–169 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007669001861
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007669001861