Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the use of probabilistic expectations data to predict behavior in incomplete scenarios posed by the researcher. The information that respondents have when replying to questions posing incomplete scenarios is a subset of the information that they would have in actual choice settings. Hence such questions do not elicit pure statements of preference; they elicit preferences mixed with expectations of future events that may affect choice behavior. The analysis developed here assumes respondents recognize that their behavior may depend on information they do not have when expectations are elicited, and that they answer coherently and honestly given the information provided. The objective in imagining such ideal respondents is to place a logical upper bound on the predictive content of elicited choice expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, Sidney. (1967). ''The Construction of a Utility Function from Expenditure Data,'' International Economic Review 8, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, S., Scott Cardell, and Jerry Hausman. (1981). ''Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars,'' Journal of Econometrics 16, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, Moshe and Thawat Morikawa (1990). ''Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions,'' Transportation Research A 24A, 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Lawrence, A. Brandenburger, and Edward Dekel. (1991). ''Lexicographic Probabilities and Choice Under Uncertainty,'' Econometrica 59, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. (1997a). ''Perceptions of Economic Insecurity: Evidence from the Survey of Economic Expectations,'' Public Opinion Quarterly 61, 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. (1997b). ''Using Expectations Data to Study Subjective Income Expectations,'' Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 855–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. (1999). ''The Several Cultures of Research on Subjective Expecta-tions.'' In Robert Willis and James Smith eds., Wealth, Work, and Health Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Gregory and Daniel Nagin (1981). ''Random versus Fixed Coefficient Quantal Choice Models.'' In Charles Manski and Daniel McFadden eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch, Ned Welch, and Shane Frederick. (1999). ''Construal Processes in Preference Assessment,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Michael and Kathleen McGarry. (1995). ''Evaluation of Subjective Probabilities of Mortality in the HRS,'' Journal of Human Resources 30, S268-S292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. Thomas. (1966). ''Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probability: An Experiment in Survey Design,'' Journal of the American Statistical Association 61, 658–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, Jordan and G. Woodworth. (1983). ''Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data,'' Journal of Marketing Research 20, 350–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan and Patrick Suppes. (1965). ''Preference, Utility, and Subjective Probability.'' In R. Duncan Luce, R. Bush, and E. Galanter eds., Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1975). ''Maximum Score Estimation of the Stochastic Utility Model of Choice,'' Journal of Econometrics 3, 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1985). ''Semiparametric Analysis of Discrete Response: Asymptotic Properties of the Maximum Score Estimator,'' Journal of Econometrics 27, 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1988). ''Identification of Binary Response Models,'' Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 729–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1990). ''The Use of Intentions Data to Predict Behavior: A Best Case Analysis,'' Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 934–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1995). Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. 1997. ''Monotone Treatment Response,'' Econometrica, 65, 1311–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles and Ilan Salomon. (1987). ''The Demand for Teleshopping,'' Regional Science and Urban Economics 17, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (1973). ''Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.'' In Paul Zarembka ed., Frontiers of Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (1976). ''Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey,'' Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5, 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadrel, M., Baruch Fischhoff, and W. Davis. (1993). ''Adolescent In vulnerability,'' American Psychologist 48, 102–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos. (1972). ''Choice-by-Elimination,'' Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9, 341–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, Hal. (1982). ''The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis,'' Econometrica 50, 945–973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manski, C.F. Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 49–66 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007806822876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007806822876

Navigation