Abstract
There is increasing consensus among academic scholars, policy makers, and industry practitioners alike that the present and future secret of business survival and prosperity lies in strategic partnering and co-opeting successfully rather than outright competition. This is particularly so in knowledge-intensive, highly complex, and dynamic environments such as all high technology industries (semiconductors, aerospace, software, telecommunications, etc.), where collaborating to compete in knowledge generation and exchange has become so pervasive it is often hard to notice having become the standard modus operandi (from cross-licensing agreements to strategic complementarity in products and services). For example, witness the case of the Microsoft/Intel collaboration or “Wintel” alliance.
We propose a dynamic, learning-driven framework which uses the game theoretic perspective, drawing principally from the notion of “co-opetition” (coined by Ray Noorda, former CEO of Novell, and developed by Brandenburger and Nalebuff [1996]), to examine how a knowledge generating and leveraging value-maximizing organization (not just a for-profit firm), should position itself in relation to the range of players with whom the organization interacts (in terms of market relationships, generating and pooling of strategic knowledge assets including intellectual property rights and human capital, and other dimensions) to maximize shareholder value in the long term.
Select case studies focusing on government-university-industry strategic partnerships for research and technological development (GUISP RTDs), such as the NSF Engineering Research Centers, provide empirical validation of our concepts and especially on how to architect intelligent organizational interfaces across the spectrum of strategic R&D collaborations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, W. B. 1991, ‘Increasing Returns and the New World of Business', Harvard Business Review, 69, 100–109.
Betz, F., 1997, ‘AcademicrGovernmentrIndustry Strategic Research Partnerships', Journal of Technology Transfer, 22 (3), 9–16.
Bleeke, J. and D. Ernst, 1995, “Is Your Strategic Alliance Really a Sale?” Harvard Business Review, 73; 97–105.
Brandenburger, A. M. and B. J. Nalebuff, 1996, Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
Camerer, C. F., 1991, ‘Does Strategy Research Need Game Theory?’ Strategic Management Journal 12, 137–152.
Carayannis, E.G., forthcoming, ‘Fostering Synergies between Information Technology and Organizational and Managerial Cognition: The Role of Knowledge Management', International Journal of Technovation.
Carayannis, E. and J. Alexander, 1998, Profiles of R&D Management Practices in the United States, Study Sponsored by the European Commission Directorate General XII, May.
Carayannis, E. and J. Alexander, 1997, ‘The Role of Knowledge Exchange in Trust, Co-opetition and Post-Capitalist Economics', European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management EIASM 1997 Conference, Leuven, Belgium, June 4–6.
Carayannis, E. and J. Gover, 1997, ‘“Co-opetition,” Strategic Technology Options and Game Theory in Science Technology Policy: The Case of SEMATECH,’ Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, Oregon, July 27–31.
Carayannis, E. G., J. L. Cummings and J. Alexander, 1997,’ Co-opetition, Higher Order Technological Learning, and Strategic Innovation: Winning in Knowledge-Driven Environments', Unpublished Working Paper, The George Washington University.
Doz, Y. L, 1996, ‘The Evolution of Cooperation in Strategic Alliances: Initial Conditions or Learning Processes?’ Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue on Evolutionary Perspectives on Strategy, 17, 55–83
Edquist, C. ed., 1997, Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.
Engineering Research Centers ERC Consortium, 1997, ERC Best Practices Manual. Arlington, VA: Engineering Research Centers. Available at URL: http:rrwww.ercassoc. org.
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L., 1997, Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy, London: Pinter.
Gibson, D. V. and E. M. Rogers, 1994, R&D Collaboration on Trial, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Grant, R. M. ‘Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm', Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue on Knowledge and the Firm, 17, 109–122.
Heller, M. A. and R. S. Eisenberg, ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research', Science, 280 (5384), 698–710.
Inkpen, A. C., 1996, ‘Creating Knowledge through Collabora tion', California Management Review 39 (1), 123–140.
Kodama, F., 1991, Emerging Patterns of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Machlup, F., 1983, The Optimum Utilization of Knowledge, Denver: Westview Press.
Moore, J. F., 1996, The Death of Competition, New York: HarperCollins.
Moss, T., 1997, Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, National Academy of Sciences, Authors Interview, July 2.
National Academy of Engineering NAE, 1983, Guidelines for the Engineering Research Centers, Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
National Science Foundation NSF, 1997, 1997 ERC Annual Meeting, Arlington, VA. Proceedings available at URL: http:rrwww.erc-assoc.org.
NSF, 1997, The Engineering Research Centers ERC Program: An Assessment of Benefits and Outcomes. Arlington: Engineering Education and Centers Division, Directorate for Engineering, NSF, December.
Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
Patterson, R., 1997, Remarks at the 1997 NACFAM Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Porter, M. E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M.E., 1985, Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M.E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.
Prahalad, C. K. and Y. L. Doz., 1987, The Multinational Mission, New York: The Free Press.
Preston, L. E and J. E. Post, 1975, Private Management and Public Policy, New York: Prentice-Hall.
Rosenbloom, R. and Spencer, W. eds., 1996, Engines of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Senge, P., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
Senker, J. and M. Sharp, 1997, ‘Organizational Learning in Cooperative Alliances: Some Case Studies in Biotechnol ogy', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 9(1), 35–51.
Spencer, W. 1998, ‘Remarks at the National Academy of Sciences', May 21.
Stokes, D., 1997, Pasteur'sQuadrant, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Swanson, D., 1995, ‘Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model', Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 43–64.
Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen, 1997, ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–533.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carayannis, E.G., Alexander, J. Winning by Co-Opeting in Strategic Government-University-Industry R&D Partnerships: The Power of Complex, Dynamic Knowledge Networks. The Journal of Technology Transfer 24, 197–210 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007855422405
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007855422405