Skip to main content
Log in

Just Who Are You Calling Risk Averse?

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper estimates individual risk preferences based upon data that are generated by the same individuals acting in different institutions. The results show that the (estimated) numerical values of individuals' implied risk parameters are not stable within individuals across institutions. Furthermore, the ranking across subjects of the numerical values of individuals' implied risk parameters is not preserved across institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allais, Maurice. 1953. “Le Comportement de l'Homme Rational Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulants et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americane, ” Econometrica 21, 503–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gordon M., Morris H. Degroot, and Jacob Marschak. 1964. “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method, ” Behavioral Science 9, 226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, Daniel. 1738. “Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis, ” Commentarii Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5, 175–192. Translated and published in Econometrica 22, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, Colin. 1995. “Individual Decisionmaking. ” In J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., and R. Mark Isaac. 1986. “Experimental Economics and Experimental Psychology: Ever the Twain Shall Meet?” In A. J. MacFadyen and H. W. MacFadyen eds., Economic Psychology: Intersections in Theory and Application. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., R. Mark Isaac, Paula Cech, and David Conn. 1996. “Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in Procurement Contracting, ” Games and Economic Behavior 17, 147–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., and Ron Oaxaca. 1996. “Is Bidding Behavior Consistent With Bidding Theory for Private Value Auctions?” In R. M. Isaac ed., Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 6. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., Bruce Roberson, and Vernon L. Smith. 1982. “Theory and Behavior of Single-Object Auctions. ” In V. L. Smith ed., Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 2. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, James C., Vernon L. Smith, and James M. Walker. 1988. “Theory and Individual Behavior of First-Price Auctions, ” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 61–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton, and L. J. Savage. 1948. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk, ” Journal of Political Economy 56, 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Glenn W. 1989. “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions, ” American Economic Review 79, 749–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Glenn W. 1990. “Risk Attitudes in First-Price Auction Experiments: A Bayesian Analysis, ” Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R. Mark, and James M. Walker. 1985. “Information and Conspiracy in Sealed Bid Auctions, ” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 6, 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Duncan, and Willard Carleton. 1998. “Venture Capital Financing: The Role of Individuals and Institutions. ” Mimeo.

  • James, Duncan, and R. Mark Isaac. 1998. “A Theory of Risky Choice. ” Mimeo.

  • Kagel, John. 1995. “Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research. ” In J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, John, and Dan Levin. 1993. “Independent Private Value Auctions: Bidder Behavior in First-, Second-, and Third Price Auctions With Varying Numbers of Bidders, ” Economic Journal 103, 868–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, ” Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Michael, and Joseph Stiglitz. 1970. “Increasing Risk: I. A Definition, ” Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorvitz, Eric. 1998. “Experimental Tests of Fundamental Economic Theories, ” unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Arizona.

  • Von Neumann, John and Oscar Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, James M., Vernon L. Smith and James C. Cox. 1986. “Inducing Risk Neutral Preferences: An Examination in a Controlled Market Environment, ” University of Arizona, Dept. of Economics Working Paper 86–9.

  • Walker, James M., Vernon L. Smith and James C. Cox. 1987. “Bidding Behavior in First Price Sealed Bid Auctions: Use of Computerized Nash Competitors, ” Economics Letters 23, 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaac, R.M., James, D. Just Who Are You Calling Risk Averse?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20, 177–187 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007881008177

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007881008177

Navigation