Skip to main content
Log in

Success Factors for Transferring Technology to Spin-off Applications: the Case of The Technology Property Rights Concession Program in Korea

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a study of 127 firms participating in Korea's Technology Property Rights Concession Program, a program designed to stimulate technology transfer related to spin-off applications of public technology. The purpose is to identify the determinants of transfer success. The findings indicate that successful firms were motivated by the ability to access a core technology free of charge and to solve technical problems currently encountered in technology development. Second, the targeted technology was highly reliable. Third, interest in commercial success of the transfer was very high among the researchers involved in the transfer process and these researchers had a high degree of prior understanding about industrial problems on the part of participating firms. Relatedly, there was a very high satisfaction with the communication that existed between lab researchers and their industrial partners in the transfer process. Fourth, lab contributions to the transfer process were very high in the pre-commercial and commercial stages of technology development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J., 1962, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention‘, in The National Bureau Committee of Economic Research, (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609-625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A. and A. Piccaluga, 1994, ‘A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of University-Industry Relationships‘, R & D Management, 24(3), 229-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. and K. Coker, 1992, ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from US Government Laboratories‘, Technovation, 12(4), 239-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. and M. Crow, 1991, ‘Technology Transfer from U.S. Government and University R & D Laboratories‘, Technovation 11(4), 231-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. and M. Fellows, 1988, ‘Technology Transfer at the U.S. National Laboratories: A Framework for Evaluation‘, Evaluation and Program Planning 11, 65-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.A., L.G. Berry and R.K. Goel, 1990, ‘Guidelines for Successfully Transferring Government-Sponsored Innovations‘, Research Policy 20(1), 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M., F. Leverick, D. Littler and D. Wilson, 1995, ‘Success Factors for Collaborative Product Development’, R & D Management 25(1), 33-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, R.K., 1992, ‘Doing Technology Transfer in Federal Laboratories‘, Part I, Journal of Technology Transfer, Spring-Summer, 8-33.

  • Choi, Y., 1996, ‘Partnering Government Laboratories with Industry: A Comparison of the United States and Japan From a Government Laboratory's View’, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, pp. 67-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M., 1993, Technological Collaboration in Industry, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D.V. and R.W. Smilor, 1991, ‘Key Variables in Technology Transfer’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 8, 287-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson, L., 1993, ‘Managing Cooperative Research and Development: Partner Selection and Contract Design’, R & D Management 23(4), 273-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, C., 1970, ‘Technology Transfer‘, in M.J. Cetron and J.D. Goldhar (eds.), The Science of Managing Organized Technology, New York: Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, pp. 1235-1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., 1995, ‘Evaluating Program Performance: The Case of Federally-Funded Collaborative Research’, International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7/8, 847-852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogavero, L.N. and R. Shane, 1982, What Every Engineer Should Know About Technology Transfer and Innovation, NY: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morone, J. and R. Ivins, 1982, ‘Problems and Opportunities in Technology Transfer from the National Laboratories to Industry’, Research Management, May, pp. 35-44.

  • National Research Council, 1989, Learning the R & D System, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., 1959, ‘The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research’, Journal of Political Economy 67, 419-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahal, D., 1981, Patterns of Technological Innovation, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, M.S., M. Adams and W.E. Souder, 1993, ‘Improving Federal Technology Commercialization’, Journal of Technology Transfer 18(3 & 4), 63-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, J. and J. Bremer, 1991, ‘Hard Lessons in Cooperative Research’, Issues in Science and Technology, Spring, pp. 44-49.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, Y., Lee, JJ. Success Factors for Transferring Technology to Spin-off Applications: the Case of The Technology Property Rights Concession Program in Korea. The Journal of Technology Transfer 25, 237–246 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007889010655

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007889010655

Keywords

Navigation