Skip to main content
Log in

Computing Size Functions from Edge Maps

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Size functions are integer valued functions of two real variables which have been recently proposed for the representation and recognition of shape. A main limitation of the theory of size functions appeared to be the fragility of the produced representation with respect to edge fragmentation. In this paper it is shown that size functions can actually be defined without making assumptions on the topological structure of the viewed shape. Consequently, size functions can be profitably used even in the presence of fragmented edge maps. In order to demonstrate the potential of size functions for computer vision, a system for shape recognition is described and tested on two different domains. The very good performances of the system indicate that size functions are extremely effective for the analysis of shapes for which geometric models might be difficult to obtain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayache, N. and Faugeras, O. D. 1986. HYPER: A new approach for the recognition and positioning of two-dimensional objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(1):44-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. A., Mundy, J. L., Zisserman, A., Coelho, C., Heller, A., and Rothwell, C. A. 1991. Invariant descriptors for 3D object recognition and pose. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(10):971-991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosini, P. 1990. A distance for similarity classes of submanifolds of a euclidean space. Bull Austral Math Soc., 42:407-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosini, P. 1991. Measuring shapes by size functions. Proc. of SPIE on Intelligent Robotic Systems, Boston, vol. 1607, pp. 122- 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosini, P. 1992. Discrete computation of size functions. Journal of Combinatorics and Information System Science, 17(3-4):232- 250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson, W. E. L. and Lozano-Perez, T. 1984. Model-based recognition and localization from sparse range and tactile data. International Journal of Robotics Research, 3(3):3-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson, W. E. L. and Lozano-Perez, T. 1987. Localizing overlapping parts by searching the interpretation tree. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9(4):469- 482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, D. P. 1989. Three-dimensional recognition of solid objects from a two-dimensional image. A. I. Memo No. 1045, AI Lab, MIT.

  • Huttenlocher, D. P., Klanderman, G. A., and Rucklidge, W. J. 1993. Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(9):850-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. G. 1987. Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. Artificial Intelligence, 31(3):355-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, M. R. 1980. Image analysis via the general theory of moments. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 70(8):920-930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. 1987. An approach to object recognition: Aligning pictorial descriptions. A. I. Memo No. 931, AI Lab, MIT.

  • Uras, C. and Verri, A. 1994a. Studying shape through size functions. In Shape in Picture, Y. O., A. Toet, D. Foster, H. Heijmans, and P. Meer (Eds.), NATO ASI Series F, vol. 126, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uras, C. and Verri, A. 1994b. On the recognition of the alphabet of the sign language through size functions. Proc. Intl. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, vol. II, pp. 334-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verri, A., Uras, C., Frosini, P., and Ferri, M. 1993. On the use of size functions for shape analysis. Biological Cybernetics, 70(2):99- 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verri, A. and Uras, C. 1994. Invariant size functions. In Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, J. L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, and D. Forsyth (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 825, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 215-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verri, A. and Uras, C. 1996. A metric-topological approach to shape representation and recognition (submitted to Image and Vision Computing, 14:189-207).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uras, C., Verri, A. Computing Size Functions from Edge Maps. International Journal of Computer Vision 23, 169–183 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007910913691

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007910913691

Keywords

Navigation