Skip to main content
Log in

Prehistoric, historic, and present settlement patterns related to ecological hierarchy in the Eastern Upper Peninsula of Michigan, U.S.A.

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of human occupation across a landscape provides informationabout how people use the landscape, about patterns of economic development,and about social interactions of human groups. When the distributions areexamined over several thousand years, we gain an evolutionary understanding,not only of the people and their cultural patterns, but also of physicallandscape development. The focus of this assessment was to examine andcompare settlement patterns of prehistoric, historic, and present timeperiods, based on known cultural sites in the Eastern Upper Peninsula ofMichigan, U.S.A., and to generate hypotheses about the interaction ofsettlement pattern and landscape change at multiple scales. Patterns ofsettlement among the three time periods were compared at three geographicscales: by subregional ecosystems, by landscape ecosystems and by terraincharacteristics. The Michigan Bureau of History database of archaeologicalsites was searched for prehistoric habitation sites of Middle or LateWoodland period (ca. 3000-300 years before present). Historic occupationswere drawn from pre-European settlement landscape data based on General LandOffice survey notes of the 1850s. We extracted “urban” categories from landcover classified from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery to measure presentoccupations. Spatial patterns and dynamics of settlement areas in each timeperiod were examined using the ARC/INFO geographic information system (GIS).Results showed a tendency for settlement in all time periods on the bedrockand lowland landscape groups near Great Lakes shorelines, generally occupyingslopes less than two percent. The distribution of present occupations, interms of both slope aspect and geographic subregion (multi-scalar), wassimilar to the distribution of prehistoric occupations. Both prehistoric andpresent sites were primarily south facing and were frequently found alongGreen Bay and Lake Michigan shorelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, D.A. 1995. Regional Landscape Ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: A Working Map and Classification . General Technical Report, NC-178, USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.

  • Albert, D.A., S.R. Denton, & B.V. Barnes. 1986. Regional Landscape Ecosystems of Michigan .School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan.

  • Allen, T.F.H. & T.B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, J.A. 1993. Paleoshoreline Geoarchaeology in the Northern Great Lakes. Hiawatha National Forest. Heritage Program Monograph No. 1. Hiawatha National Forest.

  • Bailey, R.G. 1996. “Multi-scale ecosystem analysis.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 39: 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R.G., P.E. Avers, T. King & W.H. McNab (eds.). 1994. Ecoregions and Subregions of the United States. USDA Forest Service. Prepared in cooperation with the ECOMAP team of the Forest Service, US Geological Survey.

  • Baker, W.L. 1991. “Effects of Settlement and Fire Suppression on Landscape Structure.” Ecology, 73: 1879–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchley, E.D., D.J. Marcucci, C. Yuen, & K. Griffen. 1988. Final Report of Archaeological Investigations and Data Recovery at the Trout Point I Site: Alger County, Michigan. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Archaeological Research Laboratory, Report of Investigations No. 89.

  • Bigony, B.A. 1968. An Archaeological Survey along the South Shore of Lake Superior .Unpublished manuscript on file at the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdo, E.A. Jr. 1956. “A Review of the General Land Office Survey and of its use in Quantitative Studies of Former Forests.” Ecology, 37( 4): 754–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canham, C.D. 1978. “Catastrophic windthrow in the hemlock-hardwood forest of Wisconsin.” M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison. 94 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canham, C.D. & O.L. Loucks. 1984. “Catastrophic windthrow in the presettlement forests of Wisconsin.” Ecology 65(3): 803–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumley, C.L. 1994. Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes. Schol. Am. Res. 320 pp.

  • Curtis, J.T. 1959. Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Densmore, F. 1974. How Indians Use Wild Plants for Food, Medicine, and Crafts. Dover Publications, New York. An unabridged republication of accompanying paper, “Uses of Plants by the Chippewa Indians,” In:the Forty-fourth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1926-1927, pp. 275-397, as originally published by the United States Government Printing Office, Washington, in 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, S.B. & M.C. Branstner. 1995. 1994 Cultural Resource Evaluations: Hiawatha National Forest .Report on findings of USFS Contract No. 53-54BO-4-00920. Great Lakes Research Associates, Inc. Williamston, Michigan.

  • ECOMAP. 1993. National Hierarchical Framework of Eco-logical Units. USDA Forest Service, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS. 1994. ERDAS Field Guide, Third Edition. ERDAS Inc. 628 pp.

  • Farrand, W.R. 1982. Quaternary Geology of Michigan. State of Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Geological Survey.

  • Forman, R.T.T. 1987. The ethics of isolation, the spread of disturbance, and landscape ecology. In:Turner, M.G. (ed), Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, pp. 213–229, Ecological Studies Vol. 64. Springer-Verlag.

  • Franzen, J. 1986. Prehistoric Settlement on the Hiawatha National Forest, Michigan: A Preliminary Locational Model. Cultural Resource Management Report Number 4. Hiawatha National Forest.

  • Frelich, L.E. 1995. “Old forest in the Lake States today and before European settlement.” Natural Areas Journal 15: 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelich, L.E. and Craig G. Lorimer. 1991. “Natural disturbance regimes in hemlock-hardwood forests of the upper Great Lakes region.” Ecol. Mono. 61(2):145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, M., McAfee, R. Jr., & Wolf, C.L. (eds.). 1974. Glossary of Geology. American Geological Institute, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F.B. 1995. Reaching a landmark. Landscape Ecology, 10 (1), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graumlich, L.J. & M.B. Davis. 1993. “Holocene variation in spatial scales of vegetation pattern in the upper Great Lakes.” Ecology 74(3): 826–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, R.D., Young, F.J., Wollenhaupt, N.C., Barney, T.L., & Haithcoate, T.W. 1995. Slope class maps from soil survey and digital elevation models. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59, 509–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammett, J.E. 1992. The shapes of adaptation: historical ecology of anthropogenic landscapes in the Southeastern United States. Landscape Ecology, 7 (2), 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, M.B. 1978. The Settlement System of the Mackinac Phase. Ann Arbor, University Microfilms. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University Department of Anthropology, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. 1990. Out of Place: Restoring Identity to the Regional Landscape. Yale University Press. New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudgins, B. 1961. Michigan: Geographic Backgrounds in the Development of the Commonwealth. Fourth Edition. Edwards Brothers, Inc. Ann Arbor. 116 pp.

  • Kelso, G.K. 1993. The Kirk Street agent's house, Lowell, Massachusetts: interdisciplinary analysis of the historic landscape. Landscape Journal, 12 (2), 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kineitz, W.V. 1947. Chippewa Village. The Story of Katikitegon. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bulletin No. 25.

  • Kineitz, W.V. 1991. Indians of the Western Great Lakes 1615-1760. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, F. & H.A. Udo de Haes. 1994. “A hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implications for ecological land classification.” Landscape Ecology, 9(2): 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, J.G. 1985. Kitchi-Gami: Life Among the Lake Superior Ojibway. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St. Paul. Originally published in 1860 by Chapman and Hall, Lon-don.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, C.G. 1984. “Methodological Considerations in the Analysis of Forest Disturbance History.” Can. J. For. Res. 15: 200–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, C.G. 1980. “The use of land survey records in estimating presettlement fire frequency.” In:M.A. Stokes and J.H. Dieterich (eds.), Proceedings of the fire history workshop 20-24 October 1980, Tucson Arizona. USDA Forest Service, GTR RM-81. 142 pp.

  • Lorimer, C.G. 1977. “The presettlement forest and natural disturbance cycle of northeastern Maine.” Ecology 58: 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovis, W.A. 1979. A Cultural Resource Management Study of the Hiawatha National Forest, Michigan: Phase II, The Hypothesis Tests.Michigan State University Museum, Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 36, East Lansing, Michigan.

  • Maclean, G.A. 1994. Inventory of Deer Habitat in Michigan's Upper Peninsula Utilizing Landsat Thematic Mapper Data. Final report for Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing.

  • McGlade, J. 1995. Archaeology and ecodynamics of humanmodified landscapes. Antiquity, 69, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, H.M. 1957. Map of the Surface Formations of the Northern Peninsula of Michigan. Michigan Geological Survey Division, Publ. 49.

  • Martin, P.E. & S.R. Martin. 1979. Preliminary Archaeological Site Examination of the Proposed Expansion of US-2, Mackinac County, Michigan. Michigan Technological University. Cultural Resource Management Report 3. Houghton, Michigan.

  • Martin, S.R. 1985. Models of Change in the Woodland Settlement of the Northern Great Lakes Region. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University Department of Anthropology, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer, J.I. 1995. “Culture and changing landscape structure.” Landscape Ecology 10(4): 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer, J.I. & R. Westmacott. 1987. Progressiveness among farmers as a factor in heterogeneity of farmed landscapes. In:Turner, M.G.(ed), Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, pp. 199–212, Ecological Studies Vol. 64. Springer-Verlag.

  • Palik, B.J. & K.S. Pregitzer. 1992. “A comparison of presettlement and present-day forests on two big tooth aspen-dominated landscapes in northern lower Michigan.” Am. Midl. Nat. 127: 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, W.L. 1986. Late Wisconsinan Glacial History of Northeastern Wisconsin and Western Upper Michigan. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1652. United States Government Printing Office.

  • Price, D.L. 1994. An Ecological Study of the Composition, Structure and Disturbance Regimes of the Pre-European Settlement Forests of Western Chippewa County, Michigan. M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University, Dept. of Forestry.

  • Risser, P.G. 1987. Landscape ecology: State of the art. ln: Turner, M.G. (ed), Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, pp. 3–14, Ecological Studies Vol. 64. Springer-Verlag.

  • Rossignol, J. & L. Wandsnider (eds.). 1992. Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York. 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J.S. 1996. “Land classification and ecosystem classifi-cation.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 39:11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J.S. 1991. “Forests as Landscape Ecosystems: Implications for their Regionalization and Classification.” Symposium. Ecological Land Classification: Applications to Identify the Productive Potential of Southern Forests .Charlotte, NC. Jan. 7-9.

  • Santer, R.A. 1977. Michigan: Heart of the Great Lakes. Kendal/Hunt Publishing Company. Dubuque, Iowa. 363 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoolcraft, H.R. 1970. Narrative Journals of Travels from Detroit Northwest through the Great Chain of American Lakes to the Sources of the Mississippi River in the Year 1920. Arno Press, Inc. and the New York Times. Originally published in 1821 by E. and E. Hosford, Albany.

  • Senniger, E.J. Jr. 1963. Atlas of Michigan. Flint Geographical Press. Flint. 60 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbernagel, J. 1996. Dialectical Sequences between Culture and Landscape Structure: An Integrated Cultural and Landscape Ecological Approach.Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan Technological University School of Forestry and Wood Products, Houghton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, C.R. 1995. Geoarchaeological perspectives on paleolandscapes and regional subsurface archaeology. J. of Arch. Method and Theory, 2 (1), 69–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, H.H. 1987. Atlas of Great Lakes Indian History University of Oklahoma Press.

  • Trygg, J.W. 1964, 1969. Composite Map of U.S. Land Surveyors' Original Plats and Field Notes. Sheets 11, 12, and 13. Michigan Series. Michigan Technological University Archives.

  • Uhlig, P.C. & J.K. Jordan. 1996. “A spatial hierarchical framework for the co-management of ecosystems in Canada and the United States for the Upper Great Lakes region.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 39: 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L, R.V. O'Neill & H.H. Shugart, Jr.. 1987. “Landscape ecology: A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns.” Bioscience, 37: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, J.O. 1959. Presettlement forests of Michigan.Department of Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing. Map.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, G.G. 1986. “Relation of Michigan's presettlement pine forests to substrate and disturbance history.” Ecology 67: 1548–1559.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silbernagel, J., Martin, S.R., Gale, M.R. et al. Prehistoric, historic, and present settlement patterns related to ecological hierarchy in the Eastern Upper Peninsula of Michigan, U.S.A.. Landscape Ecology 12, 223–240 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007946907682

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007946907682

Navigation