Skip to main content
Log in

Did Open Access Integrate Natural Gas Markets? An Arbitrage Cost Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies, using analyses that measure the correlation between prices in various markets, have argued that deregulation of natural gas pipeline contracts has reduced the transaction costs between natural gas markets. Correlations approaches, however, have potentially serious problems. Given these problems, this article estimates transactions costs directly. Deregulation is found to have lowered transactions costs to and from the Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas regions, but increased transactions costs from the Rocky Mountain area. Deregulation of pipeline contracts, by lowering the cost of using the market and therefore increasing demand for pipeline capacity, may therefore have differential impacts upon transactions costs between markets. This study implies that the transactions cost approach may be able to overcome several difficulties inherent in the correlations approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Jonathan B. 1987. “Why Price Correlations Do Not Define Antitrust Markets: On Econometric Algorithms for Market Definition.” Federal Trade Commission Working Paper No. 149 (January).

  • Barnekov, Christopher C., and Andrew N. Kleit. 1990. “The Efficiency Effects of Railroad Deregulation in the United States.” International Journal of Transport Economics 17(1):21–36 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Bruce L., Merle D. Faminow, Milton H. Marquis, and Douglas G. Sauer. 1994. “The Impact of Provincial Marketing Boards on Price Relations and Pricing Dynamics in the North American Slaughter Hog Market.” Applied Economics 24(7): 677–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, Emile J., and Ramon Rabinovitch. 1995. “Regional Limitations on the Hedging Effectiveness of Natural Gas Futures.” The Energy Journal 16(3): 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVany, Arthur S., and W. David Walls. 1994. “Open Access and the Emergence of a Competitive Natural Gas Market.” Contemporary Economic Policy 12(2):77–95 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVany, Arthur S., and W. David Walls. 1995. The Emerging New Order in Natural Gas. Westport CT: Quorom.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVany, Arthur S., and W. David Walls. 1996. “The Law of One Price in a Network: Arbitrage and Price Dynamics in Natural Gas City Gate Markets.” Journal of Regional Science 36(4): 555–70 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. 1992. “Horizontal Merger Guidelines.” Antitrust and Trade Regulation Report 62:1559 (April 2).

  • Fomby, T. B., R. C. Hill, and S. R. Johnson. 1988. Advanced Econometric Methods. New York: Springer-Verlaug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleit, Andrew N., and Halldor P. Palsson. 1996. “Is There Anticompetitive Behavior in the Central Canadian Cement Industry?: Testing Transaction Cost Hypotheses.” Canadian Journal of Economics 29(1): 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenfeld, James A. 1996. “The Merger Guidelines as Applied.” The Economics of the Antitrust Process, edited by M. Coate and A. Kleit, Boston: Kluwer, pages 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, Thomas P., and Steven C. Hackett. 1993. “Bottlenecks and Governance Structures: Open Access and Long-term Contracting in Natural Gas.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 9(2): 380–398 (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, Michael T., and Robert E. McCormick. 1982. “A Positive Theory of Environmental Quality Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 25(1): 108–135 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, Robert J. 1996. “Market Power in Electric Utility Mergers: Access, Energy, and the Guidelines.” Energy Law Journal 17(2): 401–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, Richard J., Catherine L. Kling, and Hoy F. Carman. 1991. “Market Integration, Efficiency of Arbitrage, and Imperfect Competition: Methodology and Application to U.S. Celery.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(3): 568–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, Pablo T., and Cliff J. Huang. 1986. “On the Extent of the Market: Wholesale Gasoline in the Northeastern United States.” Journal of Industrial Economics 35(2): 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, Daniel F., and Michael J. Doane. 1994. “Open Access and the Evolution of the U.S. Spot Market for Natural Gas.” Journal of Law and Economics 37(2): 477–518 (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N.D., and J. Rifkin. 1985. “Geographic Markets, Causality, and Railroad Deregulation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 422–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, John M. Vernon, and Joseph E. Harrington, Jr. 1992. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, W. David. 1994. “Price Convergence Across Natural Gas Fields and City Markets.” The Energy Journal 15(4): 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Robert J. 1991. "Is the World Oil Market 'One Great Pool'?" The Energy Journal 12(3): 95-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, Donald M. 1984. “Properties of Technical Efficiency Estimators in the Stochastic Frontier Model.” Journal of Econometrics 25: 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werden, Gregory J., and Luke M. Froeb. 1993. “Correlation, Causality, and All that Jazz: The Inherent Shortcomings of Price Tests for Antitrust Market Delineation.” Review of Industrial Organization 8(3): 329–354 (June).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleit, A.N. Did Open Access Integrate Natural Gas Markets? An Arbitrage Cost Approach. Journal of Regulatory Economics 14, 19–33 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008067504059

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008067504059

Keywords

Navigation